Imatinib mesylate in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced KIT-mutant melanoma following progression on standard therapy: A phase I/II trial and study protocol.
Journal
Medicine
ISSN: 1536-5964
Titre abrégé: Medicine (Baltimore)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985248R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Dec 2021
10 Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
19
10
2021
accepted:
29
10
2021
entrez:
10
12
2021
pubmed:
11
12
2021
medline:
8
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Genetic alterations of KIT gene are known to be one of the major causes of melanoma. Those are more common in the mucous and acral subtypes and KIT is regarded as major oncogene in Asian melanomas, where the prevalence of these subtypes is high. Up to date, several clinical trials have been conducted to target KIT gene alterations in melanoma with unsatisfied efficacies. Imatinib mesylate, a small-molecule inhibitor of the KIT tyrosine kinase, provides a rapid but not durable clinical response in KIT-mutant melanoma. Meanwhile, recent basic and clinical evidence have revealed another aspect of KIT-targeted therapy, namely the enhancement of antitumor activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Herein, we designed clinical trial of co-administrating imatinib mesylate and pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1 antibody) to evaluate its safety and efficacy. This is an open-label, single-arm, phase I/II clinical trial involving Japanese patients with metastatic KIT-mutant melanoma that are refractory to standard therapy including anti-PD-1 therapy. Phase I study is a dose-escalation study comprising two dose levels of imatinib mesylate (200 and 400 mg/day, respectively) with fixed dose of pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) to evaluate safety and tolerability and determine recommended phase II dose. The primary endpoint of the phase II study is the objective response rate after 4 cycles (3 weeks/cycle) of pembrolizumab and imatinib mesylate at the dose determined in phase I, based on RECIST version 1.1. A Simon's minimax two-stage design is employed to test the null hypothesis of a 5% response rate vs 30% alternative, which will be rejected when a lower confidence limit of two-sided 90% confidence interval of true response rate is over than threshold response rate. The secondary endpoints include progression free survival, overall survival, best overall response and incidence of adverse events. Totally, a target size of 22 patients will be expected. If this study shows efficacy and acceptable safety profile, it will contribute to the development of novel treatment option for patients with KIT-mutant melanoma that are refractory to standard therapy. NCT04546074. Date of Registration: September 11, 2020 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04546074). Date of First Participant Enrollment: December 23, 2020.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34889232
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027832
pii: 00005792-202112100-00013
pmc: PMC8663894
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
Imatinib Mesylate
8A1O1M485B
pembrolizumab
DPT0O3T46P
KIT protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit
EC 2.7.10.1
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04546074']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e27832Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Références
Curtin JA, Busam K, Pinkel D, Bastian BC. Somatic activation of KIT in distinct subtypes of melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:4340–6.
Meng D, Carvajal RD. KIT as an oncogenic driver in melanoma: an update on clinical development. Am J Clin Dermatol 2019;20:315–23.
Kong Y, Si L, Zhu Y, et al. Large-scale analysis of KIT aberrations in Chinese patients with melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 2011;17:1684–91.
Sakaizawa K, Ashida A, Uchiyama A, et al. Clinical characteristics associated with BRAF, NRAS and KIT mutations in Japanese melanoma patients. J Dermatol Sci 2015;80:33–7.
Carvajal RD, Antonescu CR, Wolchok JD, et al. KIT as a therapeutic target in metastatic melanoma. JAMA 2011;305:2327–34.
Hodi FS, Corless CL, Giobbie-Hurder A, et al. Imatinib for melanomas harboring mutationally activated or amplified KIT arising on mucosal, acral, and chronically sun-damaged skin. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:3182–90.
Guo J, Si L, Kong Y, et al. Phase II, open-label, single-arm trial of imatinib mesylate in patients with metastatic melanoma harboring c-Kit mutation or amplification. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:2904–9.
Lee SJ, Kim TM, Kim YJ, et al. Phase II trial of nilotinib in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma harboring KIT gene aberration: a multicenter trial of Korean Cancer Study Group (UN10-06). Oncologist 2015;20:1312–9.
Carvajal RD, Lawrence DP, Weber JS, et al. Phase II study of nilotinib in melanoma harboring KIT alterations following progression to prior KIT inhibition. Clin Cancer Res 2015;21:2289–96.
Guo J, Carvajal RD, Dummer R, et al. Efficacy and safety of nilotinib in patients with KIT-mutated metastatic or inoperable melanoma: final results from the global, single-arm, phase II TEAM trial. Oncology 2017;28:1380–7.
Kalinsky K, Lee S, Rubin KM, et al. A phase 2 trial of dasatinib in patients with locally advanced or stage IV mucosal, acral, or vulvovaginal melanoma: a trial of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E2607). Cancer 2017;123:2688–97.
Zitvogel L, Rusakiewicz S, Routy B, Ayyoub M, Kroemer G. Immunological off-target effects of imatinib. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2016;13:431–46.
Garton AJ, Seibel S, Lopresti-Morrow L, et al. Anti-KIT monoclonal antibody treatment enhances the antitumor activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors by reversing tumor-induced immunosuppression. Mol Cancer Ther 2017;16:671–80.
Somasundaram R, Connelly T, Choi R, et al. Tumor-infiltrating mast cells are associated with resistance to anti-PD-1 therapy. Nat Commun 2021;12:346.
Yamashita C, Otsuka A, Nomura M, et al. Successful treatment of metastatic mucosal melanoma with a Del579 c-KIT mutation by imatinib after treatment of anti-PD-1 antibody. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2019;33:e92–3.
Abdou Y, Kapoor A, Hamad L, Ernstoff MS. Combination of pembrolizumab and imatinib in a patient with double KIT mutant melanoma: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98:e17769.
Heinrich MC, Corless CL, Demetri GD, Blanke CD, Mehren MV, Joensuu H. Kinase mutations and imatinib response in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:4342–9.
Pham DM, Guhan S, Tsao H. KIT and melanoma: biological insights and clinical implications. Yonsei Med J 2020;61:562–71.