Personalised reprogramming to prevent progressive pacemaker-related left ventricular dysfunction: A phase II randomised, controlled clinical trial.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bradycardia
/ therapy
Double-Blind Method
Echocardiography
Female
Heart Ventricles
/ physiopathology
Humans
Male
Natriuretic Peptide, Brain
/ blood
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Pacemaker, Artificial
/ adverse effects
Patient-Specific Modeling
Peptide Fragments
/ blood
Quality of Life
Stroke Volume
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
/ etiology
Ventricular Remodeling
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
26
03
2021
accepted:
15
10
2021
entrez:
13
12
2021
pubmed:
14
12
2021
medline:
20
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Pacemakers are widely utilised to treat bradycardia, but right ventricular (RV) pacing is associated with heightened risk of left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and heart failure. We aimed to compare personalised pacemaker reprogramming to avoid RV pacing with usual care on echocardiographic and patient-orientated outcomes. A prospective phase II randomised, double-blind, parallel-group trial in 100 patients with a pacemaker implanted for indications other than third degree heart block for ≥2 years. Personalised pacemaker reprogramming was guided by a published protocol. Primary outcome was change in LV ejection fraction on echocardiography after 6 months. Secondary outcomes included LV remodeling, quality of life, and battery longevity. Clinical and pacemaker variables were similar between groups. The mean age (SD) of participants was 76 (+/-9) years and 71% were male. Nine patients withdrew due to concurrent illness, leaving 91 patients in the intention-to-treat analysis. At 6 months, personalised programming compared to usual care, reduced RV pacing (-6.5±1.8% versus -0.21±1.7%; p<0.01), improved LV function (LV ejection fraction +3.09% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48 to 5.70%; p = 0.02]) and LV dimensions (LV end systolic volume indexed to body surface area -2.99mL/m2 [95% CI -5.69 to -0.29; p = 0.03]). Intervention also preserved battery longevity by approximately 5 months (+0.38 years [95% CI 0.14 to 0.62; p<0.01)) with no evidence of an effect on quality of life (+0.19, [95% CI -0.25 to 0.62; p = 0.402]). Personalised programming in patients with pacemakers for bradycardia can improve LV function and size, extend battery longevity, and is safe and acceptable to patients. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03627585.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Pacemakers are widely utilised to treat bradycardia, but right ventricular (RV) pacing is associated with heightened risk of left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and heart failure. We aimed to compare personalised pacemaker reprogramming to avoid RV pacing with usual care on echocardiographic and patient-orientated outcomes.
METHODS
A prospective phase II randomised, double-blind, parallel-group trial in 100 patients with a pacemaker implanted for indications other than third degree heart block for ≥2 years. Personalised pacemaker reprogramming was guided by a published protocol. Primary outcome was change in LV ejection fraction on echocardiography after 6 months. Secondary outcomes included LV remodeling, quality of life, and battery longevity.
RESULTS
Clinical and pacemaker variables were similar between groups. The mean age (SD) of participants was 76 (+/-9) years and 71% were male. Nine patients withdrew due to concurrent illness, leaving 91 patients in the intention-to-treat analysis. At 6 months, personalised programming compared to usual care, reduced RV pacing (-6.5±1.8% versus -0.21±1.7%; p<0.01), improved LV function (LV ejection fraction +3.09% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48 to 5.70%; p = 0.02]) and LV dimensions (LV end systolic volume indexed to body surface area -2.99mL/m2 [95% CI -5.69 to -0.29; p = 0.03]). Intervention also preserved battery longevity by approximately 5 months (+0.38 years [95% CI 0.14 to 0.62; p<0.01)) with no evidence of an effect on quality of life (+0.19, [95% CI -0.25 to 0.62; p = 0.402]).
CONCLUSIONS
Personalised programming in patients with pacemakers for bradycardia can improve LV function and size, extend battery longevity, and is safe and acceptable to patients.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03627585.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34898655
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259450
pii: PONE-D-21-09614
pmc: PMC8668131
doi:
Substances chimiques
Peptide Fragments
0
pro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)
0
Natriuretic Peptide, Brain
114471-18-0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03627585']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0259450Subventions
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : CH/13/1/30086
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : PG/18/82/34120
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : FS/17/78/33180
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : ICA-CDRF-2016-02-055
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : RG/09/010/28087
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : FS/12/80/29821
Pays : United Kingdom
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
MFP received a NIHR fellowship for the submitted work and discloses payments for developing and delivering unrelated educational presentations for Abbott, JG holds a NIHR fellowship outside of this work has been paid for developing and delivering educational presentations for Abbott, RMC held a BHF intermediate fellowship, MTK holds a BHF chair, and KKW held a NIHR clinician scientist award parallel to but outside of this work and discloses payment for unrelated educational presentations with Medtronic, Abbott, and Microport. KKW, MTK and RMC have also received unconditional research support in the form of an educational grant from Medtronic UK to the University of Leeds towards a PhD fellowship for clinicians and allied health professionals and KKW provides mentorship and education to trainee clinicians across Europe and the Middle East through an unconditional grant from Abbott. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
Circulation. 1996 Nov 1;94(9 Suppl):II245-7
pubmed: 8901754
Eur Heart J. 2019 Nov 21;40(44):3641-3648
pubmed: 31504437
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2015 Nov;16(11):743-50
pubmed: 24979115
Circulation. 1998 Aug 11;98(6):588-95
pubmed: 9714117
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jul 27;56(5):392-406
pubmed: 20650361
N Engl J Med. 1998 Apr 16;338(16):1097-104
pubmed: 9545357
Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Oct;9(10):
pubmed: 27656000
N Engl J Med. 1987 Oct 22;317(17):1098
pubmed: 3657876
Clin Cardiol. 1989 Sep;12(9):505-12
pubmed: 2791372
Heart. 2014 May;100(10):765-9
pubmed: 24430095
Europace. 2008 Mar;10(3):351-7
pubmed: 18245771
BMJ. 2016 Feb 04;352:i228
pubmed: 26848134
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008 Feb;19(2):136-41
pubmed: 18005026
Eur Heart J. 2013 Aug;34(29):2281-329
pubmed: 23801822
Am Heart J. 1990 Dec;120(6 Pt 2):1538-40
pubmed: 2248209
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011 Aug;34(8):1013-27
pubmed: 21707667
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Nov 2;44(9):1883-8
pubmed: 15519023
Europace. 2009 Nov;11 Suppl 5:v58-65
pubmed: 19861392