Facilitators and Barriers to the Adoption of an Electronic Medical Record System by Intensive Care Nurses.

Electronic medical records Theoretical Domains Framework engagement intensive care motivation nurses wellbeing

Journal

Studies in health technology and informatics
ISSN: 1879-8365
Titre abrégé: Stud Health Technol Inform
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9214582

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Dec 2021
Historique:
entrez: 18 12 2021
pubmed: 19 12 2021
medline: 22 12 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Introducing new technology, such as an electronic medical record (EMR) into an Intensive Care Unit (ICU), can contribute to nurses' stress and negative consequences for patient safety. The aim of this study was to explore ICU nurses' perceptions of factors expected to influence their adoption of an EMR in their workplace. The objectives were to: 1) measure psychological factors expected to influence ICU nurses' adoption of EMR, and 2) explore perceptions of facilitators and barriers to the implementation of an EMR in their workplace. Using an explanatory sequential mixed method approach, data were collected using surveys and focus groups. ICU nurses reported high scores for motivation, work engagement and wellbeing. Focus group analyses revealed two themes: Hope the EMR will bring a new world and Fear of unintended consequences. Recommendations relate to strategies for education and training, environmental restructuring and enablement. Overall, ICU nurses were optimistic about EMR implementation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34920583
pii: SHTI210785
doi: 10.3233/SHTI210785
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

510-515

Auteurs

Somtochukwu Amaka Osajiuba (SA)

Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Rebecca Jedwab (R)

Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Rafael Calvo (R)

Dyson School of Design Engineering, Imperial College London, London South Kensington, United Kingdom.

Naomi Dobroff (N)

Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Nicholas Glozier (N)

The University of Sydney, Sydney New South Wales, Australia.

Alison Hutchinson (A)

Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research - Monash Health Partnership, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Michael Leiter (M)

Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Katrina Nankervis (K)

Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Helen Rawson (H)

Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Bernice Redley (B)

Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research - Monash Health Partnership, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Elizabeth Manias (E)

Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH