Fasted intestinal solubility limits and distributions applied to the biopharmaceutics and developability classification systems.
Acyclovir
Biopharmaceutics classification system
Developability classification system
Dipyridamole
Fasted simulated intestinal fluid
Furosemide
Griseofulvin
Ibuprofen
Mefenamic acid
Paracetamol
Solubility
Journal
European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V
ISSN: 1873-3441
Titre abrégé: Eur J Pharm Biopharm
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9109778
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2022
Jan 2022
Historique:
received:
26
09
2021
revised:
06
12
2021
accepted:
10
12
2021
pubmed:
20
12
2021
medline:
22
3
2022
entrez:
19
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
After oral administration, a drug's solubility in intestinal fluid is an important parameter influencing bioavailability and if the value is known it can be applied to estimate multiple biopharmaceutical parameters including the solubility limited absorbable dose. Current in vitro measurements may utilise fasted human intestinal fluid (HIF) or simulated intestinal fluid (SIF) to provide an intestinal solubility value. This single point value is limited since its position in relation to the fasted intestinal solubility envelope is unknown. In this study we have applied a nine point fasted equilibrium solubility determination in SIF, based on a multi-dimensional analysis of fasted human intestinal fluid composition, to seven drugs that were previously utilised to investigate the developability classification system (ibuprofen, mefenamic acid, furosemide, dipyridamole, griseofulvin, paracetamol and acyclovir). The resulting fasted equilibrium solubility envelope encompasses literature solubility values in both HIF and SIF indicating that it measures the same solubility space as current approaches with solubility behaviour consistent with previous SIF design of experiment studies. In addition, it identifies that three drugs (griseofulvin, paracetamol and acyclovir) have a very narrow solubility range, a feature that single point solubility approaches would miss. The measured mid-point solubility value is statistically equivalent to the value determined with the original fasted simulated intestinal fluid recipe, further indicating similarity and that existing literature results could be utilised as a direct comparison. Since the multi-dimensional approach covered greater than ninety percent of the variability in fasted intestinal fluid composition, the measured maximum and minimum equilibrium solubility values should represent the extremes of fasted intestinal solubility and provide a range. The seven drugs all display different solubility ranges and behaviours, a result also consistent with previous studies. The dose/solubility ratio for each measurement point can be plotted using the developability classification system to highlight individual drug behaviours. The lowest solubility represents a worst-case scenario which may be useful in risk-based quality by design biopharmaceutical calculations than the mid-point value. The method also permits a dose/solubility ratio frequency distribution determination for the solubility envelope which permits further risk-based refinement, especially where the drug crosses a classification boundary. This novel approach therefore provides greater in vitro detail with respect to possible biopharmaceutical performance in vivo and an improved ability to apply risk-based analysis to biopharmaceutical performance. Further studies will be required to expand the number of drugs measured and link the in vitro measurements to in vivo results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34923138
pii: S0939-6411(21)00355-6
doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2021.12.006
pmc: PMC8769049
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Pharmaceutical Preparations
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
160-169Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Références
Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2020 Aug;153:226-240
pubmed: 32585351
Mol Pharm. 2017 Dec 4;14(12):4170-4180
pubmed: 29072917
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2018 Jul 30;120:61-72
pubmed: 29704643
Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2021 Nov;168:90-96
pubmed: 34419602
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2018 Jan 1;111:247-256
pubmed: 28987539
J Pharm Sci. 2018 Aug;107(8):2020-2032
pubmed: 29665381
Pharm Res. 1995 Mar;12(3):413-20
pubmed: 7617530
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1996 Jun 12;19(3):359-76
pubmed: 11540095
Mol Pharm. 2017 Dec 4;14(12):4132-4144
pubmed: 28749696
Mol Pharm. 2019 May 6;16(5):1890-1905
pubmed: 30848917
Pharm Res. 1993 Jun;10(6):865-70
pubmed: 8321855
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2015 Jan 25;67:65-75
pubmed: 25444845
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2019 Jun 5;170:22-29
pubmed: 30903926
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2018 Jan 1;111:311-319
pubmed: 28986196
AAPS J. 2017 Jul;19(4):989-1001
pubmed: 28516359
Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel. 2004 Jan;7(1):75-85
pubmed: 14982151
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2014 Jun 16;57:152-63
pubmed: 24486482
J Pharm Sci. 2016 Feb;105(2):673-681
pubmed: 26228456
J Pharm Sci. 2010 Dec;99(12):4940-54
pubmed: 20821390
Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2020 May;150:14-23
pubmed: 32035969
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2007 Jul 30;59(7):591-602
pubmed: 17599644
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2017 Dec 15;110:37-50
pubmed: 28215942
J Pharm Sci. 2015 Sep;104(9):2855-63
pubmed: 25411065
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2014 Jun 16;57:322-32
pubmed: 23994640
Mol Pharm. 2015 Dec 7;12(12):4405-13
pubmed: 26568266
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2011 Jul 17;43(4):260-9
pubmed: 21570465
Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2015 Aug;94:229-40
pubmed: 26032292
J Pharm Sci. 1985 May;74(5):588-9
pubmed: 4020642
Int J Pharm. 2017 Aug 7;528(1-2):471-484
pubmed: 28591618
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2014 Jun 16;57:173-99
pubmed: 24215735
Pharm Res. 2000 Jul;17(7):891-4
pubmed: 10990211