The Australian Genetics of Depression Study: New Risk Loci and Dissecting Heterogeneity Between Subtypes.
Genetics
Genome-wide association study
Heterogeneity
Major depressive disorder
Polygenic risk scores
Psychiatry
Journal
Biological psychiatry
ISSN: 1873-2402
Titre abrégé: Biol Psychiatry
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0213264
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 08 2022
01 08 2022
Historique:
received:
09
04
2021
revised:
21
09
2021
accepted:
24
10
2021
pubmed:
21
12
2021
medline:
19
7
2022
entrez:
20
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common and highly heterogeneous psychiatric disorder, but little is known about the genetic characterization of this heterogeneity. Understanding the genetic etiology of MDD can be challenging because large sample sizes are needed for gene discovery-often achieved with a trade-off in the depth of phenotyping. The Australian Genetics of Depression Study is the largest stand-alone depression cohort with both genetic data and in-depth phenotyping and comprises a total of 15,792 participants of European ancestry, 92% of whom met diagnostic criteria for MDD. We leveraged the unique nature of this cohort to conduct a meta-analysis with the largest publicly available depression genome-wide association study to date and subsequently used polygenic scores to investigate genetic heterogeneity across various clinical subtypes of MDD. We increased the number of known genome-wide significant variants associated with depression from 103 to 126 and found evidence of association of novel genes implicated in neuronal development. We found that a polygenic score for depression explained 5.7% of variance in MDD liability in our sample. Finally, we found strong support for genetic heterogeneity in depression with differential associations of multiple psychiatric and comorbid traits with age of onset, longitudinal course, and various subtypes of MDD. Until now, this degree of detailed phenotyping in such a large sample of MDD cases has not been possible. Along with the discovery of novel loci, we provide support for differential pathways to illness models that recognize the overlap with other common psychiatric disorders as well as pathophysiological differences.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common and highly heterogeneous psychiatric disorder, but little is known about the genetic characterization of this heterogeneity. Understanding the genetic etiology of MDD can be challenging because large sample sizes are needed for gene discovery-often achieved with a trade-off in the depth of phenotyping.
METHODS
The Australian Genetics of Depression Study is the largest stand-alone depression cohort with both genetic data and in-depth phenotyping and comprises a total of 15,792 participants of European ancestry, 92% of whom met diagnostic criteria for MDD. We leveraged the unique nature of this cohort to conduct a meta-analysis with the largest publicly available depression genome-wide association study to date and subsequently used polygenic scores to investigate genetic heterogeneity across various clinical subtypes of MDD.
RESULTS
We increased the number of known genome-wide significant variants associated with depression from 103 to 126 and found evidence of association of novel genes implicated in neuronal development. We found that a polygenic score for depression explained 5.7% of variance in MDD liability in our sample. Finally, we found strong support for genetic heterogeneity in depression with differential associations of multiple psychiatric and comorbid traits with age of onset, longitudinal course, and various subtypes of MDD.
CONCLUSIONS
Until now, this degree of detailed phenotyping in such a large sample of MDD cases has not been possible. Along with the discovery of novel loci, we provide support for differential pathways to illness models that recognize the overlap with other common psychiatric disorders as well as pathophysiological differences.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34924174
pii: S0006-3223(21)01715-7
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.10.021
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
227-235Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Society of Biological Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.