Resection of Tarsal Coalition in 27 Children with 2 Years Follow-Up - Patient-Reported Outcomes Using the Validated Oxford Ankle Foot Questionnaire.
coalitio
oxafq
prom
Journal
The Iowa orthopaedic journal
ISSN: 1555-1377
Titre abrégé: Iowa Orthop J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8908272
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2021
12 2021
Historique:
entrez:
20
12
2021
pubmed:
21
12
2021
medline:
7
1
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) after resection of tarsal coalitions are sparse. This cross-sectional study evaluates the outcome after resection of tarsal coalitions in children using the validated Oxford Foot and Ankle Questionnaire (OxAFQ). Tarsal coalition patients between 5-16 years of age from Aarhus University Hospital (Denmark) and The Royal London Hospital (United Kingdom) were included. The patients were identified using patient and theatre register. All patients and proxies filled in the PROM: OxAFQ-C and OxAFQ-proxy respectively. The scores were calculated within each domain and reported as means (95% confidence intervals). Talocalcaneal coalitions were compared to calcaneonavicular coalition with regard to OxAFQ score and re-operation rate. 27 patients and their proxies returned 54 questionnaires in total regarding 36 feet. Mean time from surgery to filling of the questionnaire was 25 (21-30) months. The relative mean OxAFQ score was higher in the School and Play and Emotional domain than the Physical domain, p = 0.007. The OxAFQ scores and re-operation rates were similar for both coalitions, p=0.63. The OxAFQ PROM showed more encouraging results in playing or emotional health status than the physical health status. The outcome for both types of coalitions is similar.
Sections du résumé
Background
Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) after resection of tarsal coalitions are sparse. This cross-sectional study evaluates the outcome after resection of tarsal coalitions in children using the validated Oxford Foot and Ankle Questionnaire (OxAFQ).
Methods
Tarsal coalition patients between 5-16 years of age from Aarhus University Hospital (Denmark) and The Royal London Hospital (United Kingdom) were included. The patients were identified using patient and theatre register. All patients and proxies filled in the PROM: OxAFQ-C and OxAFQ-proxy respectively. The scores were calculated within each domain and reported as means (95% confidence intervals). Talocalcaneal coalitions were compared to calcaneonavicular coalition with regard to OxAFQ score and re-operation rate.
Results
27 patients and their proxies returned 54 questionnaires in total regarding 36 feet. Mean time from surgery to filling of the questionnaire was 25 (21-30) months. The relative mean OxAFQ score was higher in the School and Play and Emotional domain than the Physical domain, p = 0.007. The OxAFQ scores and re-operation rates were similar for both coalitions, p=0.63.
Conclusion
The OxAFQ PROM showed more encouraging results in playing or emotional health status than the physical health status. The outcome for both types of coalitions is similar.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6-11Informations de copyright
Copyright © The Iowa Orthopaedic Journal 2021.
Références
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Feb;105(1S):S123-S131
pubmed: 29601967
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983 Jul-Aug;(177):54-60
pubmed: 6861407
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014 Jun;100(4):423-7
pubmed: 24793905
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Nov;58(6):1223-1228
pubmed: 31679676
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983 Dec;(181):28-36
pubmed: 6641062
Bone Joint J. 2015 Mar;97-B(3):420-6
pubmed: 25737528
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1948 Nov;30B(4):624-34
pubmed: 18894612
EFORT Open Rev. 2020 Feb 26;5(2):80-89
pubmed: 32175094
J Pediatr Orthop. 1998 Nov-Dec;18(6):748-54
pubmed: 9821130
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1972;85:16-22
pubmed: 5036920
J Pediatr Orthop. 2021 Jan;41(1):e74-e79
pubmed: 32804862
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991 Aug;(269):249-56
pubmed: 1864046
Foot Ankle Clin. 2015 Mar;20(1):81-91
pubmed: 25726485
Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Oct;34(10):1370-5
pubmed: 23667048
J Pediatr Orthop. 1997 Jan-Feb;17(1):13-5
pubmed: 8989693
J Pediatr Orthop. 2012 Apr-May;32(3):301-7
pubmed: 22411338
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Mar;79(3):369-74
pubmed: 9070525
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990 Jan;72(1):71-7
pubmed: 2104855
Acta Orthop Scand. 1968;39(3):424-32
pubmed: 5730320
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994 Sep;76(5):797-801
pubmed: 8083272
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2020 Feb;32(1):93-99
pubmed: 31789975
J Pediatr Orthop. 2015 Sep;35(6):583-8
pubmed: 25333904
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Nov;90(11):1451-6
pubmed: 18978264
J Pediatr Orthop. 2009 Jul-Aug;29(5):418-26
pubmed: 19568010
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Sep 5;94(17):1584-94
pubmed: 22992849
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Jan;81(1):11-9
pubmed: 9973049
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2003 Jul-Aug;93(4):259-63
pubmed: 12869594