Contraction patterns of the systemic right ventricle: a three-dimensional echocardiography study.
Humans
Male
Adult
Middle Aged
Female
Heart Ventricles
/ diagnostic imaging
Ventricular Function, Right
Ventricular Dysfunction, Right
/ diagnostic imaging
Stroke Volume
Congenitally Corrected Transposition of the Great Arteries
Transposition of Great Vessels
/ diagnostic imaging
Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional
congenital heart disease
systemic right ventricle
three-dimensional echocardiography
Journal
European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging
ISSN: 2047-2412
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101573788
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 11 2022
17 11 2022
Historique:
received:
08
09
2021
accepted:
06
12
2021
pubmed:
21
12
2021
medline:
22
11
2022
entrez:
20
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate contraction patterns of the systemic right ventricle (SRV) in patients with transposition of great arteries (TGA) post-atrial switch operation and with congenitally corrected transposition of great arteries (ccTGA). Right ventricular (RV) volumes and ejection fraction (EF) were measured by three-dimensional echocardiography in 38 patients with the SRV (24 TGA and 14 ccTGA; mean age 45 ± 12 years, 63% male), and in 38 healthy volunteers. The RV contraction was decomposed along the longitudinal, radial, and anteroposterior directions providing longitudinal, radial, and anteroposterior EF (LEF, REF, and AEF, respectively) and their contributions to total right ventricular ejection fraction (LEFi, REFi, and AEFi, respectvely). SRV was significantly larger with lower systolic function compared with healthy controls. SRV EF and four-chamber longitudinal strain strongly correlated with B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) level (Rho -0.73, P < 0.0001 and 0.70, P < 0.0001, respectively). In patients with TGA, anteroposterior component was significantly higher than longitudinal and radial components (AEF 17 ± 4.5% vs. REF 13 ± 4.9% vs. LEF 10 ± 3.3%, P < 0.0001; AEFi 0.48 ± 0.09 vs. REFi 0.38 ± 0.1 vs. LEFi 0.29 ± 0.08, P < 0.0001). In patients with ccTGA, there was no significant difference between three SRV components. AEFi was significantly higher in TGA subgroup compared with ccTGA (0.48 ± 0.09 vs. 0.36 ± 0.08, P = 0.0002). Contraction patterns of the SRV are different in TGA and ccTGA. Anteroposterior component is dominant in TGA providing compensation for impaired longitudinal and radial components, while in ccTGA all components contribute equally to the total EF. SRV EF and longitudinal strain demonstrate strong correlation with BNP level and should be a part of routine echocardiographic assessment of the SRV.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34928339
pii: 6470611
doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab272
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1654-1662Informations de copyright
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2021. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest: A.K., B.K.L., M.T., and A.F. report personal consulting fees from Argus Cognitive, Inc. Other co-authors have nothing to disclose.