Hasty decision-making in individuals at higher risk of developing an eating disorder.

Beads task Cognitive bias Disordered eating Eating disorders Jumping to conclusions

Journal

Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry
ISSN: 1873-7943
Titre abrégé: J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0245075

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2022
Historique:
received: 21 12 2020
revised: 04 11 2021
accepted: 06 12 2021
pubmed: 21 12 2021
medline: 23 3 2022
entrez: 20 12 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The Jumping to Conclusions (JTC) bias is the tendency to make hasty decisions based on limited evidence and may contribute to the formation of over-valued beliefs about the importance of weight, shape and eating. Previous research investigating the JTC bias in clinical eating disorder samples, as assessed by the beads task, is inconclusive. The current study investigated the JTC bias in a non-clinical sample of undergraduate students identified as being lower or higher risk of developing an eating disorder. The study used a more reliable 'distractor' beads task that also incentivised hastier decisions by elevating the pressure of the task. Female undergraduate students (N = 156, 48%, classified as higher risk) completed a pressure and non-pressure distractor beads task, along with measures of weight concern and body-image flexibility. Higher risk participants displayed a hastier decision-making style than lower risk participants. Task pressure elicited a hastier decision-making style across the whole sample, however, was unable to distinguish between higher and lower eating disorder risk status. Interpretation of findings are limited to non-clinical samples and may not generalise to clinical eating disorder populations. Findings suggest the need for replication in a clinical eating disorder sample using the distractor beads task. Future research should investigate whether eating disorder salient stimuli elicits a stronger bias.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
The Jumping to Conclusions (JTC) bias is the tendency to make hasty decisions based on limited evidence and may contribute to the formation of over-valued beliefs about the importance of weight, shape and eating. Previous research investigating the JTC bias in clinical eating disorder samples, as assessed by the beads task, is inconclusive. The current study investigated the JTC bias in a non-clinical sample of undergraduate students identified as being lower or higher risk of developing an eating disorder. The study used a more reliable 'distractor' beads task that also incentivised hastier decisions by elevating the pressure of the task.
METHODS
Female undergraduate students (N = 156, 48%, classified as higher risk) completed a pressure and non-pressure distractor beads task, along with measures of weight concern and body-image flexibility.
RESULTS
Higher risk participants displayed a hastier decision-making style than lower risk participants. Task pressure elicited a hastier decision-making style across the whole sample, however, was unable to distinguish between higher and lower eating disorder risk status.
LIMITATIONS
Interpretation of findings are limited to non-clinical samples and may not generalise to clinical eating disorder populations.
CONCLUSIONS
Findings suggest the need for replication in a clinical eating disorder sample using the distractor beads task. Future research should investigate whether eating disorder salient stimuli elicits a stronger bias.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34929485
pii: S0005-7916(21)00082-3
doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2021.101717
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101717

Informations de copyright

Crown Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Ryan P Balzan (RP)

College of Education, Psychology, and Social Work, Flinders University, Australia; Blackbird Initiative, Órama Institute for Mental Health and Wellbeing, Australia. Electronic address: ryan.balzan@flinders.edu.au.

Madeline Gilder (M)

College of Education, Psychology, and Social Work, Flinders University, Australia.

Tenille Nancarrow (T)

College of Education, Psychology, and Social Work, Flinders University, Australia.

Teri Mavrangelos (T)

College of Education, Psychology, and Social Work, Flinders University, Australia.

Tracey D Wade (TD)

College of Education, Psychology, and Social Work, Flinders University, Australia; Blackbird Initiative, Órama Institute for Mental Health and Wellbeing, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH