Use and Usability Of Custom-Made Knee-Ankle-Foot Orthoses In Polio Survivors with Knee Instability: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
Journal
Journal of rehabilitation medicine
ISSN: 1651-2081
Titre abrégé: J Rehabil Med
Pays: Sweden
ID NLM: 101088169
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Feb 2022
14 Feb 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
22
12
2021
medline:
17
2
2022
entrez:
21
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To investigate the use of custom-made knee-ankle-foot orthoses in daily life and differences in usability factors of knee-ankle-foot orthoses between users and discontinued users. Cross-sectional survey study. A total of 163 polio survivors provided with a knee-ankle-foot orthosis at an outpatient clinic of a university hospital. Use and usability of knee-ankle-foot orthoses in daily life were assessed with a postal questionnaire. Usability factors were formulated using the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9241-11 standard. A total of 106 respondents (65%) returned the questionnaire. Of these, 98 were eligible for analysis. Seventy-four respondents (76%) reported using their knee-ankle-foot orthosis. Compared with discontinued users (24%), users experienced more limitations when walking without an orthosis (p = 0.001), were more often experienced with wearing a previous orthosis (p < 0.001) and were more often prescribed with a locked rather than a stance-control knee-ankle-foot orthosis (p = 0.015). Furthermore, users reported better effectiveness of their knee-ankle-foot orthosis (p < 0.001), more satisfaction with goals of use and knee-ankle-foot orthosis-related aspects (p < 0.001). The majority of polio survivors used their custom-made knee-ankle-foot orthoses in daily life. Factors related to continued use, such as walking ability without orthosis, expectations of the orthosis, previous orthosis experience and type of knee-ankle-foot orthosis provided, should be considered and discussed when prescribing a knee-ankle-foot orthosis in polio survivors.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34931255
doi: 10.2340/jrm.v53.1122
pmc: PMC8892334
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
jrm00261Références
Neuromuscul Disord. 2015 Mar;25(3):225-30
pubmed: 25613808
Physiother Res Int. 2007 Mar;12(1):39-49
pubmed: 17432393
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2011 Mar;35(1):106-12
pubmed: 21515896
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2021 Jul;64(4):101428
pubmed: 32805457
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 17;9(10):e029313
pubmed: 31628124
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2017 Feb;41(1):41-50
pubmed: 26246356
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989 May;70(5):371-5
pubmed: 2719540
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006 Dec;21(10):1081-9
pubmed: 16949186
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2006 Dec;30(3):246-56
pubmed: 17162515
J Rehabil Med. 2007 Oct;39(8):646-50
pubmed: 17896057
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Jan;87(1):136-40
pubmed: 16401452
J Rehabil Med. 2007 Oct;39(8):651-7
pubmed: 17896058
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Nov;92(11):1796-801
pubmed: 22032213
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Jun;80(6):687-90
pubmed: 10378496
J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1055-68
pubmed: 9817123
J Appl Biomech. 2013 Aug;29(4):474-80
pubmed: 23182738
Physiother Res Int. 2012 Dec;17(4):191-9
pubmed: 22228620
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):344-9
pubmed: 18313558
J Rehabil Med. 2010 Nov;42(10):908-15
pubmed: 21031286
NeuroRehabilitation. 1997;8(2):119-38
pubmed: 24525982
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020 Oct;56(5):575-584
pubmed: 32452662
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Feb;80(2):136-43
pubmed: 10025486
Disabil Rehabil. 2003 Mar 18;25(6):267-72
pubmed: 12623616