Dual PD-1 and CTLA-4 Checkpoint Blockade Using Balstilimab and Zalifrelimab Combination as Second-Line Treatment for Advanced Cervical Cancer: An Open-Label Phase II Study.
Adult
Aged
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
/ administration & dosage
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
CTLA-4 Antigen
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ drug therapy
Prognosis
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Survival Rate
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Young Adult
Journal
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
ISSN: 1527-7755
Titre abrégé: J Clin Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309333
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 03 2022
01 03 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
22
12
2021
medline:
8
3
2022
entrez:
21
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Balstilimab (antiprogrammed death-1) and zalifrelimab (anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4) are two new checkpoint inhibitors emerging as promising investigational agents for the treatment of advanced cervical cancer. This phase II trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03495882) evaluated the combination of balstilimab plus zalifrelimab in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic cervical cancer who relapsed after prior platinum-based therapy. Patients were intravenously dosed with balstilimab 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks and zalifrelimab 1 mg/kg once every 6 weeks, for up to 24 months. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR, RECIST version 1.1, assessed by independent central review). Secondary end points included duration of response, safety and tolerability, and survival. In total, 155 women (median age, 50 years [range, 24-76 years]) were enrolled and treated with balstilimab plus zalifrelimab; 125 patients had measurable disease at baseline and one prior line of platinum-based therapy in the advanced setting, and these patients constituted the efficacy-evaluable population. The median follow-up was 21 months. The confirmed ORR was 25.6% (95% CI, 18.8 to 33.9), including 10 complete responders and 22 partial responders, with median duration of response not reached (86.5%, 75.5%, and 64.2% at 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively). The ORRs were 32.8% and 9.1% in patients with programmed death ligand-1-positive and programmed death ligand-1-negative tumors, respectively. For patients with squamous cell carcinoma, the ORR was 32.6%. The overall disease control rate was 52% (95% CI, 43.3 to 60.6). Hypothyroidism (14.2%) and hyperthyroidism (7.1%) were the most common immune-mediated adverse events. Promising and durable clinical activity, with favorable tolerability, was seen in this largest trial to date evaluating dual programmed death-1/cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 blockade in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic cervical cancer. Further investigation of the balstilimab and zalifrelimab combination in this setting is continuing.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34932394
doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02067
pmc: PMC8887945
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
CTLA-4 Antigen
0
CTLA4 protein, human
0
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
0
PDCD1 protein, human
0
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
0
balstilimab
1Q2QT5M7EO
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03495882']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
762-771Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA016058
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2019 Jan 31;15:211-221
pubmed: 30774357
BMJ. 2018 Nov 08;363:k4226
pubmed: 30409774
Am J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb;39(1):98-106
pubmed: 26558876
World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jul 3;18(1):150
pubmed: 32620130
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 03;375(18):1749-1755
pubmed: 27806233
Oncogene. 2021 Feb;40(8):1393-1395
pubmed: 33500548
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;28(suppl_4):iv72-iv83
pubmed: 28881916
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Nov;163(2):274-280
pubmed: 34452745
N Engl J Med. 2015 Sep 24;373(13):1270-1
pubmed: 26398076
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jun;22(6):836-847
pubmed: 33989557
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016 Dec;108:164-174
pubmed: 27931835
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2016 Jul;24(6):392-7
pubmed: 27333219
Future Oncol. 2021 Sep;17(26):3433-3443
pubmed: 34409858
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
Lancet Oncol. 2021 May;22(5):609-619
pubmed: 33845034
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 4;13(4):e0191926
pubmed: 29617360
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jan;76(1):43-50
pubmed: 27307501
Cell. 2017 Sep 7;170(6):1120-1133.e17
pubmed: 28803728
J Clin Invest. 2018 Aug 1;128(8):3209-3218
pubmed: 30067248
N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 20;370(8):734-43
pubmed: 24552320
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 05;378(14):1277-1290
pubmed: 29562145
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Mar 10;36(8):773-779
pubmed: 29355075
Trends Biochem Sci. 2018 Dec;43(12):1014-1032
pubmed: 30287140
Mol Cancer Ther. 2015 Apr;14(4):847-56
pubmed: 25695955
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Jun 22;21(12):
pubmed: 32580338
Front Pharmacol. 2017 Feb 08;8:49
pubmed: 28228726
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 17;381(16):1535-1546
pubmed: 31562797
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jun 10;37(17):1470-1478
pubmed: 30943124
N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 5;377(14):1345-1356
pubmed: 28889792
N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 21;381(21):2020-2031
pubmed: 31562796
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Feb;8(2):e191-e203
pubmed: 31812369
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Feb 01;10:65
pubmed: 30774597
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Mar;148(3):609-621
pubmed: 29666026
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jul 12;4(7):e173776
pubmed: 29145543
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun;96(26):e7325
pubmed: 28658143
Integr Cancer Sci Ther. 2018;5(2):
pubmed: 29955379
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Nov;19(11):1480-1492
pubmed: 30361170
Healthcare (Basel). 2019 Sep 17;7(3):
pubmed: 31533297
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Jun 13;38(1):255
pubmed: 31196207