Quantitative assessment of intra- and inter-modality deformable image registration of the heart, left ventricle, and thoracic aorta on longitudinal 4D-CT and MR images.
cardiotoxicity
deformable image registration
multimodality
Journal
Journal of applied clinical medical physics
ISSN: 1526-9914
Titre abrégé: J Appl Clin Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101089176
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Feb 2022
Historique:
revised:
17
09
2021
received:
21
07
2021
accepted:
29
11
2021
pubmed:
29
12
2021
medline:
16
2
2022
entrez:
28
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based investigations into radiotherapy (RT)-induced cardiotoxicity require reliable registrations of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to planning computed tomography (CT) for correlation to regional dose. In this study, the accuracy of intra- and inter-modality deformable image registration (DIR) of longitudinal four-dimensional CT (4D-CT) and MR images were evaluated for heart, left ventricle (LV), and thoracic aorta (TA). Non-cardiac-gated 4D-CT and T1 volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (T1-VIBE) MRI datasets from five lung cancer patients were obtained at two breathing phases (inspiration/expiration) and two time points (before treatment and 5 weeks after initiating RT). Heart, LV, and TA were manually contoured. Each organ underwent three intramodal DIRs ((A) CT modality over time, (B) MR modality over time, and (C) MR contrast effect at the same time) and two intermodal DIRs ((D) CT/MR multimodality at same time and (E) CT/MR multimodality over time). Hausdorff distance (HD), mean distance to agreement (MDA), and Dice were evaluated and assessed for compliance with American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group (TG)-132 recommendations. Mean values of HD, MDA, and Dice under all registration scenarios for each region of interest ranged between 8.7 and 16.8 mm, 1.0 and 2.6 mm, and 0.85 and 0.95, respectively, and were within the TG-132 recommended range (MDA < 3 mm, Dice > 0.8). Intramodal DIR showed slightly better results compared to intermodal DIR. Heart and TA demonstrated higher registration accuracy compared to LV for all scenarios except for HD and Dice values in Group A. Significant differences for each metric and tissue of interest were noted between Groups B and D and between Groups B and E. MDA and Dice significantly differed between LV and heart in all registrations except for MDA in Group E. DIR of the heart, LV, and TA between non-cardiac-gated longitudinal 4D-CT and MRI across two modalities, breathing phases, and pre/post-contrast is acceptably accurate per AAPM TG-132 guidelines. This study paves the way for future evaluation of RT-induced cardiotoxicity and its related factors using multimodality DIR.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34962065
doi: 10.1002/acm2.13500
pmc: PMC8833287
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e13500Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA016059
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : P30CA016059
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Références
Cardiooncology. 2020 Jul 1;6:6
pubmed: 32626602
Br J Radiol. 2004;77 Spec No 2:S140-53
pubmed: 15677356
Front Oncol. 2015 Feb 03;5:9
pubmed: 25692095
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Jan 1;79(1):10-8
pubmed: 20421148
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022 Feb 1;112(2):417-425
pubmed: 34509552
Acta Oncol. 2019 Sep;58(9):1225-1237
pubmed: 31155990
Heart Rhythm. 2020 Mar;17(3):415-422
pubmed: 31585181
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2016 Apr 26;1(2):106-114
pubmed: 28740877
Med Phys. 2016 Jun;43(6):2721-2730
pubmed: 27277019
Strahlenther Onkol. 2015 Nov;191(11):862-8
pubmed: 26168782
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2017 Dec;6(6):670-688
pubmed: 29218270
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2021 Jul-Aug;11(4):282-298
pubmed: 33662576
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2017 May-Jun;22(3):201-208
pubmed: 28461783
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2020 Aug 05;5(6):1170-1178
pubmed: 33305078
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Aug 1;65(5):1560-71
pubmed: 16863933
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Jun 3;20(1):264
pubmed: 32493217
Med Phys. 2017 Jul;44(7):e43-e76
pubmed: 28376237
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004 Jul;287(1):H243-50
pubmed: 15016625
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Nov;6(6):1080-91
pubmed: 24254478
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 May 08;17(3):158-170
pubmed: 27167273
Phys Med. 2017 Oct;42:150-156
pubmed: 29173909
Korean J Radiol. 2020 Apr;21(4):450-461
pubmed: 32193893
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022 Feb;23(2):e13500
pubmed: 34962065
Eur Heart J. 2016 Sep 21;37(36):2768-2801
pubmed: 27567406
JACC CardioOncol. 2020 Jun 16;2(2):270-292
pubmed: 34396235
Phys Med. 2017 Dec;44:108-112
pubmed: 28947188
Circ Res. 2016 Mar 18;118(6):1008-20
pubmed: 26987914
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2018 Dec;16(12):931-950
pubmed: 30360659
Acta Oncol. 2019 Jan;58(1):81-87
pubmed: 30306817
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Apr;49(4):1029-36
pubmed: 19341890
Radiol Oncol. 2017 Sep 15;51(4):438-446
pubmed: 29333123
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Dec;12(6):501-10
pubmed: 23745788
Circulation. 2002 Jan 29;105(4):539-42
pubmed: 11815441
Radiother Oncol. 2017 Mar;122(3):416-422
pubmed: 28233564
Curr Probl Cancer. 2018 Jul;42(4):386-396
pubmed: 30297038
Med Phys. 2010 Dec;37(12):6279-91
pubmed: 21302784
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Jan;21(1):166-173
pubmed: 31808307
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2018 Sep 07;4(1):177-185
pubmed: 30706026
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Mar 1;109(3):783-800
pubmed: 33160007