Effect of Inquiry-Based Stress Reduction on Well-being and Views on Risk-Reducing Surgery Among Women With BRCA Variants in Israel: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 12 2021
01 12 2021
Historique:
entrez:
28
12
2021
pubmed:
29
12
2021
medline:
18
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The high risk for breast and ovarian cancers conferred by being a carrier of BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline variant can negatively impact physical and psychological well-being. Novel nonpharmacological interventions on well-being in women with BRCA variants have rarely been reported. To determine the effect of a 12-week inquiry-based stress reduction (IBSR) program on psychological well-being, sleep quality, psychosocial variables, and attitudes toward risk-reducing surgical procedures among women in Israel who carried BRCA variants. This randomized clinical trial had a 12-week intervention period and a 12-week follow-up period. It was conducted between April 1, 2017, and July 31, 2020. Participants were recruited from the Meirav Breast Center at the Sheba Medical Center, Israel, and the intervention was conducted in Tel Aviv, Israel. The cohort included women with BRCA variants. Data were analyzed from August 1 to December 1, 2020. Women were randomly assigned to the 12-week IBSR program or standard care. The IBSR technique is based on the skills of mindfulness, inquiry, and cognitive reframing. The intervention included standardized, weekly group meetings conducted throughout 12 weeks. Standard care included semi-annual breast examinations and breast magnetic resonance imaging (alternating), a gynecological examination, a transvaginal ultrasonographic examination, and CA-125 serum determination. Differences between the groups were tested using mixed-effects models in an intent to treat analysis. The primary outcome was psychological well-being, including 6 parameters: autonomy, personal growth, positive relationships, control of the environment, goals in life, and self-acceptance. Secondary outcomes included sleep quality, attitudes toward risk-reducing surgical procedures, and psychosocial variables. Questionnaires were administered at baseline (T1), at completion of the 12-week intervention (T2), and 12 weeks after completion of the intervention (T3). Overall, 100 women (mean [SD] age, 41.37 [11.06] years) completed the study, with 50 randomized to the intervention group and 50 randomized to the control group. Mean (SD) time from variant discovery was 4.7 (3.3) years. There were no differences between the intervention and control groups in baseline mean (SD) scores of psychological well-being parameters (autonomy: 55.20 [11.12] vs 56.77 [9.90]; environmental control: 56.30 [11.98 vs 58.51 [11.41]; positive relationships: 63.10 [15.91] vs 68.10 [9.86]; goals in life: 60.00 [14.12] vs 64.82 [10.57]; self-acceptance: 55.02 [16.62] vs 60.32 [13.50]) except personal growth (63.70 [14.66] vs 68.85 [8.07]). The IBSR group, compared with the control group, experienced better mean (SD) scores on all psychological well-being parameters at T2 (autonomy: 63.64 [8.35] vs 54.73 [10.41]; environmental control: 63.95 [10.05] vs 57.45 [11.43]; personal growth: 73.00 [8.34] vs 65.76 [10.95]; positive relationships 71.17 [9.99] vs 65.06 [12.58]; goals in life: 67.57 [8.88] vs 61.18 [12.87]; self-acceptance: 66.93 [11.15] vs 58.09 [15.55]) and at T3 (autonomy: 62.68 [9.05] vs 56.12 [10.64]; environmental control: 64.55 [10.28] vs 59.35 [12.98]; personal growth: 72.00 [8.06] vs 67.15 [11.82]; positive relationships: 71.24 [9.78] vs 66.92 [12.37]; goals in life: 68.33 [8.54] vs 62.92 [13.24]; self-acceptance: 66.84 [11.35] vs 58.97 [17.03]). Individuals in the IBSR group also experienced statistically significant improvements in sleep quality (mean [SD]: T1, 7.35 [3.97]; T3, 4.63 [3.21], P < .001), whereas the control group experienced no statistically significant difference. Women in the intervention group had a more favorable consideration of risk-reducing oophorectomy, from 7 women (14%) who refused to consider oophorectomy at T1 to 1 woman (2%) who refused to consider it at T3 (P = .04), and similar change in consideration of mastectomy: from 23 women (46%) who refused to consider mastectomy at T1 to 13 women (29%) who refused to consider it at T3 (P < .001). This randomized clinical trial found that IBSR improved psychological well-being and led to a more favorable view on risk-reducing surgical procedures for at least 6 months among women in Israel who carried BRCA variants. These results suggest that IBSR may be implemented as a self-practice tool to enhance the well-being of individuals who carry BRCA variants and support them in their decision-making processes. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03162276.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34962562
pii: 2787459
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.39670
pmc: PMC8715352
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03162276']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2139670Références
Am J Community Psychol. 1983 Feb;11(1):1-24
pubmed: 6837532
Psychother Psychosom. 2014;83(1):10-28
pubmed: 24281296
JAMA. 2008 Jan 9;299(2):194-201
pubmed: 18182601
Health Econ Rev. 2012 Oct 05;2(1):21
pubmed: 23036352
Br J Cancer. 2019 Jul;121(1):15-21
pubmed: 30971774
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Jun;157(2):319-327
pubmed: 27117159
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Dec 20;32(36):4073-80
pubmed: 25403211
Sleep. 2010 May;33(5):585-92
pubmed: 20469800
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 01;18(7):
pubmed: 33916258
J Genet Couns. 2006 Apr;15(2):77-83
pubmed: 16761103
J Psychosom Res. 1998 Jul;45(1):5-13
pubmed: 9720850
Brain Sci. 2020 Jul 21;10(7):
pubmed: 32708055
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
Psychooncology. 2015 Jun;24(6):726-31
pubmed: 25328041
Explore (NY). 2015 Jan-Feb;11(1):24-31
pubmed: 25497228
J Sleep Res. 2010 Jun;19(2):333-40
pubmed: 20337906
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jan;185(2):391-399
pubmed: 33000375
Am J Med Genet. 2001 Jan 1;98(1):15-24
pubmed: 11426450
J Clin Psychol. 2006 Mar;62(3):373-86
pubmed: 16385481
J Clin Psychol. 2021 Jun;77(6):1280-1295
pubmed: 33538339
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Apr;84(4):822-48
pubmed: 12703651
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:CD007064
pubmed: 23152241
Womens Health (Lond). 2012 Sep;8(5):543-55
pubmed: 22934728
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70
pubmed: 3397865
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Oct;27(10):3647-3656
pubmed: 31203511
Bull Exp Biol Med. 2012 Mar;152(5):610-2
pubmed: 22803146
JAMA. 2017 Jun 20;317(23):2402-2416
pubmed: 28632866
J Genet Couns. 2016 Oct;25(5):880-91
pubmed: 27074860
Fam Cancer. 2013 Sep;12(3):509-18
pubmed: 23264090
Genet Med. 2010 May;12(5):245-59
pubmed: 20216074
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 21;11(6):e0158092
pubmed: 27328124
J Med Genet. 2000 Nov;37(11):866-74
pubmed: 11073541
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 May;71(2):234-43
pubmed: 18295433
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Mar 24;13(7):
pubmed: 33804884
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 09;10:CD012894
pubmed: 31595976
BJOG. 2020 Feb;127(3):364-375
pubmed: 31507061
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 20;16(19):
pubmed: 31547223
J Pers. 1987 Jun;55(2):169-210
pubmed: 3497256
Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2017 Jan 11;15:2
pubmed: 28096903
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021 Feb;18(2):116-128
pubmed: 32973296
Psychol Health Med. 2014;19(1):103-14
pubmed: 23607692
Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Apr;113(1):128-33
pubmed: 19178933
Sleep Med. 2017 Apr;32:246-256
pubmed: 27743803