Is laparoscopic major hepatectomy feasible and safe in Swiss cantonal hospitals?


Journal

Swiss medical weekly
ISSN: 1424-3997
Titre abrégé: Swiss Med Wkly
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 100970884

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 12 2021
Historique:
entrez: 29 12 2021
pubmed: 30 12 2021
medline: 1 4 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The number of laparoscopic liver resections is increasing worldwide, including in Switzerland. However, laparoscopy is mostly used for minor resections. Little is known about indications for and outcomes of major liver resections performed laparoscopically. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcome of open and laparoscopic major liver resection cohorts in two Swiss centres. Patients undergoing open or laparoscopic major hepatectomy (>3 segments) in two cantonal hospitals from January 2015 to December 2019 were analysed. All disease types except perihilar cholangiocarcinomas, rare malignancies and resections with biliary reconstruction were included. The primary outcome was the number of complications incurred. Operation time, blood loss, hospital stay and 90-day mortality were secondary outcomes investigated. A separate analysis was performed for colorectal liver metastases, the most common indication. Potential risk factors for major complications were evaluated in a multivariate analysis. A total of 88 patients were identified. Among those, 34 patients underwent laparoscopic major hepatectomy (LAPH) and 54 patients open major hepatectomy (OH). The two groups did not differ in demographics. The most common indication was malignancy (LAPH 94% vs OH 98%), mainly colorectal liver metastases (LAPH 53% vs OH 59%). There was no significant difference in major complications (21% vs 15%, p = 0.565). Median operation time (LAPH 433 minutes, interquartile range [IQR 351-482 vs OH 397 minutes, IQR 296-446; p = 0.222), blood loss (325 ml, IQR 200-575 vs 475 ml, IQR 300-800; p = 0.150) and hospital stay (9 days, IQR 8-14 vs 11 days, IQR 9-14; p = 0.441) were comparable between the two cohorts. There was no significant difference in 90-day mortality (3% vs 7%, p = 0.881). The laparoscopic technique was not identified as a risk factor for major complications in a multivariate analysis. This first report from Switzerland evaluating outcomes of laparoscopic major hepatectomies showed no difference in complications and clinical non-inferiority compared with open major hepatectomy.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The number of laparoscopic liver resections is increasing worldwide, including in Switzerland. However, laparoscopy is mostly used for minor resections. Little is known about indications for and outcomes of major liver resections performed laparoscopically. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcome of open and laparoscopic major liver resection cohorts in two Swiss centres.
METHODS
Patients undergoing open or laparoscopic major hepatectomy (>3 segments) in two cantonal hospitals from January 2015 to December 2019 were analysed. All disease types except perihilar cholangiocarcinomas, rare malignancies and resections with biliary reconstruction were included. The primary outcome was the number of complications incurred. Operation time, blood loss, hospital stay and 90-day mortality were secondary outcomes investigated. A separate analysis was performed for colorectal liver metastases, the most common indication. Potential risk factors for major complications were evaluated in a multivariate analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 88 patients were identified. Among those, 34 patients underwent laparoscopic major hepatectomy (LAPH) and 54 patients open major hepatectomy (OH). The two groups did not differ in demographics. The most common indication was malignancy (LAPH 94% vs OH 98%), mainly colorectal liver metastases (LAPH 53% vs OH 59%). There was no significant difference in major complications (21% vs 15%, p = 0.565). Median operation time (LAPH 433 minutes, interquartile range [IQR 351-482 vs OH 397 minutes, IQR 296-446; p = 0.222), blood loss (325 ml, IQR 200-575 vs 475 ml, IQR 300-800; p = 0.150) and hospital stay (9 days, IQR 8-14 vs 11 days, IQR 9-14; p = 0.441) were comparable between the two cohorts. There was no significant difference in 90-day mortality (3% vs 7%, p = 0.881). The laparoscopic technique was not identified as a risk factor for major complications in a multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSION
This first report from Switzerland evaluating outcomes of laparoscopic major hepatectomies showed no difference in complications and clinical non-inferiority compared with open major hepatectomy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34964580
doi: 10.4414/smw.2021.w30044
pii: Swiss Med Wkly. 2021;151:w30044
doi:
pii:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

w30044

Auteurs

Franziska Heid (F)

Department of Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Switzerland.

Johannes Toti (J)

Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Lugano, Switzerland.

Ruben C Balzarotti Canger (R)

Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Lugano, Switzerland.

Alessandra Cristaudi (A)

Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Lugano, Switzerland.

Stefan Breitenstein (S)

Department of Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Switzerland.

Pietro Majno-Hurst (P)

Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Lugano, Switzerland.

Erik Schadde (E)

Department of Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Switzerland.
Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center Chicago, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH