Comparison of Tissue Abundance of Non-Cytochrome P450 Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes by Quantitative Proteomics between Humans and Laboratory Animal Species.


Journal

Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals
ISSN: 1521-009X
Titre abrégé: Drug Metab Dispos
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9421550

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2022
Historique:
received: 10 11 2021
accepted: 13 12 2021
pubmed: 1 1 2022
medline: 5 4 2022
entrez: 31 12 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The use of animal pharmacokinetic models as surrogates for humans relies on the assumption that the drug disposition mechanisms are similar between preclinical species and humans. However, significant cross-species differences exist in the tissue distribution and protein abundance of drug-metabolizing enzymes (DMEs) and transporters. We quantified non-cytochrome P450 (non-CYP) DMEs across commonly used preclinical species (cynomolgus and rhesus monkeys, beagle dog, Sprague Dawley and Wistar Han rats, and CD1 mouse) and compared these data with previously obtained human data. Aldehyde oxidase was abundant in humans and monkeys while poorly expressed in rodents, and not expressed in dogs. Carboxylesterase (CES) 1 abundance was highest in the liver while CES2 was primarily expressed in the intestine in all species with notable species differences. For example, hepatic CES1 was 3× higher in humans than in monkeys, but hepatic CES2 was 3-5× higher in monkeys than in humans. Hepatic UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A2 abundance was ∼4× higher in dogs compared with rats, whereas UGT1A3 abundance was 3-5× higher in dog livers than its ortholog in human and monkey livers. UGT1A6 abundance was 5-6× higher in human livers compared with monkey and dog livers. Hepatic sulfotransferase 1B1 abundance was 5-7× higher in rats compared with the rest of the species. These quantitative non-CYP proteomics data can be used to explain unique toxicological profiles across species and can be integrated into physiologically based pharmacokinetic models for the mechanistic explanation of pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of xenobiotics in animal species. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: We characterized the quantitative differences in non-cytochrome P450 (non-CYP) drug-metabolizing enzymes across commonly used preclinical species (cynomolgus and rhesus monkeys, beagle dogs, Sprague Dawley and Wistar Han rats, and CD1 mice) and compared these data with previously obtained human data. Unique differences in non-CYP enzymes across species were observed, which can be used to explain significant pharmacokinetic and toxicokinetic differences between experimental animals and humans.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34969659
pii: dmd.121.000774
doi: 10.1124/dmd.121.000774
doi:

Substances chimiques

Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System 9035-51-2

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

197-203

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.

Auteurs

Abdul Basit (A)

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington (A.B., B.P.); Department of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Drug Metabolism, Merck & Co., Inc., Boston, Massachusetts (P.W.F.); Department of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California (S.C.K.); Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics Department, Gilead Sciences Inc., Foster City, California (B.P.M., B.J.S.); and BioIVT Inc., Baltimore, Maryland (S.H.).

Peter W Fan (PW)

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington (A.B., B.P.); Department of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Drug Metabolism, Merck & Co., Inc., Boston, Massachusetts (P.W.F.); Department of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California (S.C.K.); Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics Department, Gilead Sciences Inc., Foster City, California (B.P.M., B.J.S.); and BioIVT Inc., Baltimore, Maryland (S.H.).

S Cyrus Khojasteh (SC)

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington (A.B., B.P.); Department of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Drug Metabolism, Merck & Co., Inc., Boston, Massachusetts (P.W.F.); Department of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California (S.C.K.); Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics Department, Gilead Sciences Inc., Foster City, California (B.P.M., B.J.S.); and BioIVT Inc., Baltimore, Maryland (S.H.).

Bernard P Murray (BP)

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington (A.B., B.P.); Department of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Drug Metabolism, Merck & Co., Inc., Boston, Massachusetts (P.W.F.); Department of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California (S.C.K.); Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics Department, Gilead Sciences Inc., Foster City, California (B.P.M., B.J.S.); and BioIVT Inc., Baltimore, Maryland (S.H.).

Bill J Smith (BJ)

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington (A.B., B.P.); Department of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Drug Metabolism, Merck & Co., Inc., Boston, Massachusetts (P.W.F.); Department of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California (S.C.K.); Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics Department, Gilead Sciences Inc., Foster City, California (B.P.M., B.J.S.); and BioIVT Inc., Baltimore, Maryland (S.H.).

Scott Heyward (S)

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington (A.B., B.P.); Department of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Drug Metabolism, Merck & Co., Inc., Boston, Massachusetts (P.W.F.); Department of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California (S.C.K.); Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics Department, Gilead Sciences Inc., Foster City, California (B.P.M., B.J.S.); and BioIVT Inc., Baltimore, Maryland (S.H.).

Bhagwat Prasad (B)

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington (A.B., B.P.); Department of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Drug Metabolism, Merck & Co., Inc., Boston, Massachusetts (P.W.F.); Department of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California (S.C.K.); Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics Department, Gilead Sciences Inc., Foster City, California (B.P.M., B.J.S.); and BioIVT Inc., Baltimore, Maryland (S.H.) bhagwat.prasad@wsu.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH