Evaluation of a prospective radiation oncology departmental team review process using standardized simulation directives.
Quality
Radiotherapy
Simulation
Team review
Telemedicine
Journal
Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
ISSN: 1879-0887
Titre abrégé: Radiother Oncol
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8407192
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2022
05 2022
Historique:
received:
10
08
2021
revised:
24
11
2021
accepted:
19
12
2021
pubmed:
1
1
2022
medline:
20
5
2022
entrez:
31
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the utility and value of an institutional, multi-disciplinary radiation oncology team review process prior to radiotherapy (RT) simulation. Over a period of 3 months and through an iterative team-based process, a standardized simulation requisition directive (SSRD) was developed, piloted, modified, and subsequently implemented for all patients treated with external beam RT at a single tertiary care institution from January to December 2020. The SSRDs were reviewed at a daily multi-disciplinary radiation oncology team review conference; modifications consequential to the review were prospectively recorded in a quality database. 1500 consecutive SSRDs were prospectively reviewed for this study. 397 modifications on 290 (19.3%) SSRDs were recorded and parsed into 5 main categories and 18 subcategories. The most common modifications resulted from changes in immobilization device (n = 88, 22.2%), RT care path (n = 56, 14.1%), and arm positioning (n = 43, 10.8%). On univariate analysis, modifications were associated with RT intent, scan parameters, tumor site, and consultation type. An increased rate modifications was observed for patients had telemedicine consults (n = 101, 22.7%) compared to in-person consultations (n = 189, 17.9%) (p = 0.032). Using logistic regression analysis, there was also a statistically significant relationship between postoperative RT delivery and modification rates (OR: 2.913, 95% CI: 1.014-8.372) (p = 0.0126). Overall, only 14 patients (0.9%) needed re-simulation during the entire study period. Prospective multi-disciplinary radiation oncology team review prior to simulation identifies actionable change in approximately 19% of procedures, and results in an extremely low rate (<1%) of re-simulation. As departmental processes transition to virtual platforms, thorough attention is needed to identify patients at higher risk of simulation modifications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34971659
pii: S0167-8140(21)09076-9
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.12.028
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
102-110Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.