Feasibility of Screening for Chromosome 15 Imprinting Disorders in 16 579 Newborns by Using a Novel Genomic Workflow.
Adolescent
Adult
Angelman Syndrome
/ diagnosis
Child
Child, Preschool
Chromosome Duplication
/ genetics
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 15
/ genetics
DNA Methylation
/ genetics
Feasibility Studies
Female
Genetic Testing
/ methods
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Male
Neonatal Screening
/ methods
Prader-Willi Syndrome
/ diagnosis
Young Adult
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 01 2022
04 01 2022
Historique:
entrez:
4
1
2022
pubmed:
5
1
2022
medline:
26
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Newborn screening for Angelman syndrome (AS), Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS), and chromosome 15 duplication syndrome (Dup15q) may lead to benefit from early diagnosis and treatment. To examine the feasibility of newborn screening for these chromosome 15 imprinting disorders at population scale. In this diagnostic study, the validation data set for the first-tier SNRPN test, called methylation-specific quantitative melt analysis (MS-QMA), included 109 PWS, 48 AS, 9 Dup15q, and 1190 population control newborn blood spots (NBS) and peripheral tissue samples from participants recruited from January 2000 to December 2016. The test data set included NBS samples from 16 579 infants born in 2011. Infants with an NBS identified as positive for PWS, AS, or Dup15q by the first-tier test were referred for droplet digital polymerase chain reaction, real-time polymerase chain reaction, and low-coverage whole-genome sequencing for confirmatory testing. Data analyses were conducted between February 12, 2015, and August 15, 2020. In the validation data set, the median age for the 77 patients with PWS was 3.00 years (IQR, 0.01-44.50 years); for the 46 patients with AS, 2.76 years (IQR, 0.028 to 49.00 years); and for the 9 patients with Dup15q, 4.00 years (IQR, 1.00 to 28.00 years). Thirty-eight patients (51.4%) in the PWS group, 20 patients (45.5%) in the AS group, and 6 patients (66.7%) in the Dup15q group who had sex reported were male. The validation data set showed MS-QMA sensitivity of 99.0% for PWS, 93.8% for AS, and 77.8% for Dup15q; specificity of 100% for PWS, AS, and Dup15q; positive predictive and negative predictive values of 100% for PWS and AS; and a positive predictive value of 87.5% and negative predictive value of 100% for Dup15q. In the test data set of NBS samples from 16 579 infants, 92 had a positive test result using a methylation ratio cut-off of 3 standard deviations from the mean. Of these patients, 2 were confirmed to have PWS; 2, AS; and 1, maternal Dup15q. With the use of more conservative PWS- and AS-specific thresholds for positive calls from the validation data set, 9 positive NBS results were identified by MS-QMA in this cohort. The 2 PWS and 2 AS calls were confirmed by second-tier testing, but the 1 Dup15q case was not confirmed. Together, these results provided prevalence estimates of 1 in 8290 for both AS and PWS and 1 in 16 579 for maternal Dup15q, with positive predictive values for first-tier testing at 67.0% for AS, 33.0% for PWS, and 44.0% for combined detection of chromosome 15 imprinting disorders for the validation data set. The findings of this diagnostic study suggest that it is feasible to screen for all chromosome 15 imprinting disorders using SNRPN methylation analysis, with 5 individuals identified with these disorders out of 16 579 infants screened.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34982160
pii: 2787581
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.41911
pmc: PMC8728620
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2141911Références
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 3;10(1):13026
pubmed: 32747801
Am J Med Genet. 1990 Mar;35(3):319-32
pubmed: 2309779
Neurobiol Dis. 2010 May;38(2):181-91
pubmed: 18840528
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2016 Dec;172(4):384-401
pubmed: 27860204
J Neurodev Disord. 2018 Aug 6;10(1):24
pubmed: 30081815
J Endocrinol Invest. 2015 Dec;38(12):1249-63
pubmed: 26062517
Am J Med Genet A. 2019 Jan;179(1):29-36
pubmed: 30556641
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2015 Jun;62(3):587-606
pubmed: 26022164
Clin Chem. 2014 Jul;60(7):963-73
pubmed: 24778142
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2018 Mar;31(2):123-127
pubmed: 29206687
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Oct 19;21(20):
pubmed: 33086711
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1920356
pubmed: 32003821
Transl Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 29;10(1):362
pubmed: 33116122
Turk J Pediatr. 2019;61(4):505-512
pubmed: 31990467
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017 Aug 1;12(1):134
pubmed: 28764722
Genes (Basel). 2019 Nov 06;10(11):
pubmed: 31698873
Am J Med Genet. 1995 Jun 19;60(3):261-2
pubmed: 7573182
J Formos Med Assoc. 2002 Jul;101(7):488-94
pubmed: 12353341
BMC Genet. 2008 Jan 04;9:2
pubmed: 18177502
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2114336
pubmed: 34283230
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Feb 28;47(4):1605-1614
pubmed: 30566647
Essays Biochem. 2019 Dec 20;63(6):785-795
pubmed: 31696914
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2021 Aug 11;7(3):
pubmed: 34449526
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2021 Jul;63(7):802-807
pubmed: 33543479
Genome Biol. 2007;8(6):R114
pubmed: 17573966
Mol Autism. 2019 Jul 3;10:29
pubmed: 31312421
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 Jul;154(7):714-8
pubmed: 10891024
Genes (Basel). 2019 Sep 14;10(9):
pubmed: 31540108