Multiple stakeholder perspectives of factors influencing differential outcomes for ethnic minority students on health and social care placements: a qualitative exploration.

Allied health professions BAME BME Clinical placements Ethnicity Midwifery Nursing Social work Student experience

Journal

BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Jan 2022
Historique:
received: 20 05 2021
accepted: 08 12 2021
entrez: 5 1 2022
pubmed: 6 1 2022
medline: 7 1 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Despite considerable efforts there continues to be a degree awarding gap within the United Kingdom (UK) between the proportion of White British students receiving higher classifications, compared to ethnic minority UK-domiciled students. Practice placement elements constitute approximately 50% of most health and social care programmes, yet surprisingly little research exists related to the factors which may contribute to ethnic minority student placement outcomes or experiences. This study bridges this evidence gap by exploring factors influencing differential placement outcomes of ethnic minority students from the perspectives of key stakeholders. The study followed a descriptive qualitative research design and was multi-disciplinary, with participants drawn from across nursing, midwifery, social work and the allied health professions. Participants from four stakeholder categories (ethnic minority students, academic staff, placement educators and student union advisors) were invited to join separate focus groups. Focus groups were recorded and transcribed and analysed thematically. Ten separate focus groups [n = 66] yielded three primary themes: 1) recognition, which highlighted stakeholder perceptions of the issues [sub-themes: acknowledging concerns; cultural norms; challenging environments]; 2) the lived experience, which primarily captured ethnic minority student perspectives [sub-themes: problematising language and stereotyping, and being treated differently]; 3) surviving not thriving, which outlines the consequences of the lived experience [sub-themes: withdrawing mentally, feeling like an alien]. This study presents a rich exploration of the factors affecting differential outcomes of ethnic minority students on practice placements through the lens of four different stakeholder groups. To our knowledge this is the first study in which this comprehensive approach has been taken to enable multiple viewpoints to be accessed across a wide range of health and social care professions. The issues and challenges raised appear to be common to most if not all of these disciplines. This study highlights the urgent need to value and support our ethnic minority students to remove the barriers they face in their practice learning settings. This is a monumental challenge and requires both individuals and organisations to step up and take collective responsibility.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Despite considerable efforts there continues to be a degree awarding gap within the United Kingdom (UK) between the proportion of White British students receiving higher classifications, compared to ethnic minority UK-domiciled students. Practice placement elements constitute approximately 50% of most health and social care programmes, yet surprisingly little research exists related to the factors which may contribute to ethnic minority student placement outcomes or experiences. This study bridges this evidence gap by exploring factors influencing differential placement outcomes of ethnic minority students from the perspectives of key stakeholders.
METHODS METHODS
The study followed a descriptive qualitative research design and was multi-disciplinary, with participants drawn from across nursing, midwifery, social work and the allied health professions. Participants from four stakeholder categories (ethnic minority students, academic staff, placement educators and student union advisors) were invited to join separate focus groups. Focus groups were recorded and transcribed and analysed thematically.
RESULTS RESULTS
Ten separate focus groups [n = 66] yielded three primary themes: 1) recognition, which highlighted stakeholder perceptions of the issues [sub-themes: acknowledging concerns; cultural norms; challenging environments]; 2) the lived experience, which primarily captured ethnic minority student perspectives [sub-themes: problematising language and stereotyping, and being treated differently]; 3) surviving not thriving, which outlines the consequences of the lived experience [sub-themes: withdrawing mentally, feeling like an alien].
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
This study presents a rich exploration of the factors affecting differential outcomes of ethnic minority students on practice placements through the lens of four different stakeholder groups. To our knowledge this is the first study in which this comprehensive approach has been taken to enable multiple viewpoints to be accessed across a wide range of health and social care professions. The issues and challenges raised appear to be common to most if not all of these disciplines. This study highlights the urgent need to value and support our ethnic minority students to remove the barriers they face in their practice learning settings. This is a monumental challenge and requires both individuals and organisations to step up and take collective responsibility.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34983477
doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-03070-3
pii: 10.1186/s12909-021-03070-3
pmc: PMC8729071
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

17

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Nurs Inq. 2021 Jan;28(1):e12379
pubmed: 32881135
J Clin Nurs. 2012 Jul;21(13-14):2054-63
pubmed: 22672463
Med Educ. 2003 Oct;37(10):852-60
pubmed: 12974838
Elife. 2021 Aug 04;10:
pubmed: 34344502
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Oct 16;19(1):372
pubmed: 31619242
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2017 Nov 24;4:2333393617742282
pubmed: 29204457
Physiotherapy. 2018 Dec;104(4):446-452
pubmed: 29352580
Physiother Theory Pract. 2020 Feb;36(2):316-332
pubmed: 29913096
Physiotherapy. 2014 Mar;100(1):9-13
pubmed: 23953122

Auteurs

Julie Nightingale (J)

Department of Allied Health Professions, Sheffield Hallam University, Collegiate Campus, Sheffield, S10 2BP, UK. J.Nightingale@shu.ac.uk.

Jackie Parkin (J)

Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Sheffield Hallam University, Collegiate Campus, Sheffield, S10 2BP, UK.

Pete Nelson (P)

Department of Social Work, Social Care and Community Studies, Sheffield Hallam University, Collegiate Campus, Sheffield, S10 2BP, UK.

Shirley Masterson-Ng (S)

Department of Allied Health Professions, Sheffield Hallam University, Collegiate Campus, Sheffield, S10 2BP, UK.

Jacqui Brewster (J)

Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Sheffield Hallam University, Collegiate Campus, Sheffield, S10 2BP, UK.

Temitope Labinjo (T)

Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Sheffield Hallam University, Collegiate Campus, Sheffield, S10 2BP, UK.

Deborah Amoakoh (D)

Department of Radiology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.

David Lomas (D)

Department of Allied Health Professions, Sheffield Hallam University, Collegiate Campus, Sheffield, S10 2BP, UK.

Ifrah Salih (I)

Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Sheffield Hallam University, Collegiate Campus, Sheffield, S10 2BP, UK.

Deborah Harrop (D)

Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Sheffield Hallam University, Collegiate Campus, Sheffield, S10 2BP, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH