Variation in chronic nickel toxicity to Daphnia magna among Japanese river waters and performance evaluation of bioavailability models in predicting the toxicity.
Biotic ligand model
Cladocera
Hazard assessment
Metal
Reproduction test
Risk assessment
Journal
Environmental science and pollution research international
ISSN: 1614-7499
Titre abrégé: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9441769
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2022
Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
21
07
2021
accepted:
21
12
2021
pubmed:
6
1
2022
medline:
13
4
2022
entrez:
5
1
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Nickel (Ni) ecotoxicity is dictated by water chemistry characteristics such as pH, water hardness, and amount of dissolved organic carbon. Bioavailability models have been developed to predict Ni toxicity and validated for European, Australian, and US natural waters. In this study, chronic toxicity tests in Ni-spiked Japanese river waters were conducted on a strain of Daphnia magna to test whether the chronic toxicity differs among Japanese natural waters with different water chemistries. Based on the results of chronic Ni toxicity tests, we assessed the performance of existing D. magna bioavailability models, which were developed in artificial waters (Model 1) and calibrated in European natural waters (Model 2), in terms of the accuracy and the bias of model predictions. Furthermore, we also calibrated the two models by using toxicity test results to develop a bioavailability model for Ni chronic toxicity to the strain of D. magna in Japanese river waters. The 10%, 20%, and 50% effect concentrations (EC
Identifiants
pubmed: 34984608
doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-18335-z
pii: 10.1007/s11356-021-18335-z
doi:
Substances chimiques
Water Pollutants, Chemical
0
Water
059QF0KO0R
Nickel
7OV03QG267
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
27664-27676Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Adams W, Blust R, Dwyer R, Mount D, Nordheim E, Rodriguez PH, Spry D (2020) Bioavailability assessment of metals in freshwater environments: a historical review. Environ Toxicol Chem 39:48–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.4558
doi: 10.1002/etc.4558
Baird DJ, Barber I, Bradley M, Soares AMVM, Calow P (1991) A comparative study of genotype sensitivity to acute toxic stress using clones of Daphnia magna Straus. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:257–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-6513(91)90064-V
doi: 10.1016/0147-6513(91)90064-V
Barnett RE (2012) A study assessing the comparative molecular toxicities of heavy metals to multiple strains of Daphnia magna. Master thesis, University of Birmingham
Cho DY, Lee ST, Park SW, Chung AS (1994) Studies on the biosorption of heavy metals onto Chlorella vulgaris. J Environ Sci Health Part A 29:389–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529409376043
doi: 10.1080/10934529409376043
Deleebeeck NME, De Schamphelaere KAC, Janssen CR (2007a) A bioavailability model predicting the toxicity of nickel to rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) in synthetic and natural waters. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 67:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2006.10.001
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2006.10.001
Deleebeeck NME, Muyseen BTA, De Laender F, Janssen CR, De Schamphelaere KAC (2007b) Comparison of nickel toxicity to cladocerans in soft versus hard surface waters. Aquat Toxicol 84:223–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2007.03.025
doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2007.03.025
Deleebeeck NME, De Schamphelaere KAC, Janssen CR (2008) A novel method for predicting chronic nickel bioavailability and toxicity to Daphnia magna in artificial and natural waters. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:2097–2107. https://doi.org/10.1897/07-579.1
doi: 10.1897/07-579.1
Deleebeeck NME, De Schamphelaere KAC, Janssen CR (2009) Effects of Mg
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.11.052
De Schamphelaere KAC, Heijerick DG, Janssen CR (2004) Comparison of the effect of difference pH buffering techniques on the toxicity of copper and zinc to Daphnia magna and Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. Ecotoxicology 13:697–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-003-4429-9
doi: 10.1007/s10646-003-4429-9
De Schamphelaere KAC, Van Laer L, Deleebeeck NME, Muyssen BTA, Degryse F, Smolders E, Janssen CR (2006) Nickel speciation and ecotoxicity in European natural surface waters: development, refinement and validation of bioavailability models. Report prepared for the Nickel Producers Environmental Research Association. Gent University, Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology and Aquatic Ecology, Gent. https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/5785290 . Accessed 13 Febr 2020
Environment Canada (2007) Biological test method: test of reproduction and survival using the cladoceran Ceriodaphnia dubia. EPS 1/RM/21, second edition. Method Development and Application Section, Environmental Technology Centre, Ottawa
European Commission (EC) (2013) Directive 2013/39/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 August 2013 amending Directives 2000/60/EC and 2008/105/EC as regards priority substances in the field of water policy. Off J Eur Union L226:1-1
Garman ER, Meyer JS, Bergeron CM, Blewett TA, Clements WH, Elias MC et al (2020) Validation of bioavailability-based toxicity models for metals. Environ Toxicol Chem 39:101–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.4563
doi: 10.1002/etc.4563
Hayashi TI (2013) Applying biotic ligand models and Bayesian techniques: ecological risk assessment of copper and nickel in Tokyo rivers. Integr Environ Assess Manag 9:63–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.1326
doi: 10.1002/ieam.1326
Heijerick DG, Janssen CR, De Coen WM (2003) The combined effects of hardness, pH, and dissolved organic carbon on the chronic toxicity of Zn to D. magna: development of a surface response model. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 44:210–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-002-2010-9
doi: 10.1007/s00244-002-2010-9
Kozlova T, Wood CM, McGeer JC (2009) The effect of water chemistry on the acute toxicity of nickel to the cladoceran Daphnia pulex and the development of a biotic ligand model. Aquat Toxicol 91:221–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2008.11.005
doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2008.11.005
Lewis MA, Maki AW (1981) Effects of water hardness and diet on productivity of Daphnia magna Straus. in laboratory culture. Hydrobiologia 85:175–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00006627
doi: 10.1007/BF00006627
Mano H, Shinohara N (2020) Acute toxicity of nickel to Daphnia magna: validation of bioavailability models in Japanese rivers. Water Air Soil Pollut 231:459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-020-04842-1
doi: 10.1007/s11270-020-04842-1
Mano H, Shinohara N, Naito W (2020) Reproduction sensitivity of five Daphnia species to nickel. J Water Environ Technol 18:372–382. https://doi.org/10.2965/jwet.20-083
doi: 10.2965/jwet.20-083
Ministry of the Environment of Japan (MOE) (2018) Report of investigation on the water environmental quality standard for conservation of aquatic organisms in FY 2017. Tokyo, Japan (in Japanese with English abstract)
Münzinger A, Monicelli F (1991) A comparison of the sensitivity of three Daphnia magna populations under chronic heavy metal stress. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 22:24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-6513(91)90043-O
doi: 10.1016/0147-6513(91)90043-O
National Environment Research Council (NERC) (2001) Windermere humic aqueous model (WHAM), version 6. NERC, Swindon
Nys C, Janssen CR, Van Sprang P, De Schamphelaere KAC (2016) The effect of pH on chronic aquatic nickel toxicity is dependent on the pH itself: extending the chronic nickel bioavailability models. Environ Toxicol Chem 35:1097–1106. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.3232
doi: 10.1002/etc.3232
Oda S, Tatarazako N, Watanabe H, Morita M, Iguchi T (2006) Genetic differences in the production of male neonates in Daphnia magna exposed to juvenile hormone analogs. Chemosphere 63:1477–1484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.09.026
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.09.026
Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) (2012) Daphnia magna reproduction test. OECD guideline 211. Paris, France. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264185203-en . Accessed 2 March 2020
Pane EF, McGeer JC, Wood CM (2004) Effects of chronic waterborne nickel exposure on two successive generations of Daphnia magna. Environ Toxicol Chem 23:1051–1056. https://doi.org/10.1897/03-208
doi: 10.1897/03-208
Peters A, Merrington G, Schlekat CE, De Schamphelaere KAC, Stauber J, Batley G, Harford A, Van Dam R, Pease C, Mooney T, Warne M, Hickey C, Glazebrook P, Chapman J, Smith R, Krassoi R (2018) Validation of the nickel biotic ligand model for locally relevant species in Australian freshwaters. Environ Toxicol Chem 37:2566–2574. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.4213
doi: 10.1002/etc.4213
R Core Team (2019) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/ . Accessed 13 Feb 2020
Ritz C, Streibig JC (2005) Bioassay analysis using R. J Stat Softw 12:1–22. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v012.i05
doi: 10.18637/jss.v012.i05
Ritz C, Baty F, Streibig JC, Gerhard D (2015) Dose-Response Analysis Using R. Plos One 10:e0146021. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146021
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146021
Schlekat CE, Van Genderen EV, De Schamphelaere KAC, Antunes PMC, Rogevich EC, Stubblefield WA (2010) Cross-species extrapolation of chronic nickel biotic ligand models. Sci Total Environ 408:6148–6157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.09.012
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.09.012
Soucek DJ, Dickinson A, Schlekat C, Genderen EV, Hammer EJ (2020) Acute and chronic toxicity of nickel and zinc to a laboratory cultured mayfly (Neocloeon triangulifer) in aqueous but fed exposures. Environ Toxicol Chem 39:1196–1206. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.4683
doi: 10.1002/etc.4683
US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2002) Short-term methods for estimating the chronic toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to fresh organisms, fourth edition. EPA-821-R-02–013. Office of Water, Washington
US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2007) Aquatic life ambient freshwater quality criteria—copper. EPA-822-R-03–027. Washington