Evaluation of Metabolic Outcomes Following SADI-S: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Bariatric surgery
Duodenal switch
RYGB
SADI-S
Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy
Journal
Obesity surgery
ISSN: 1708-0428
Titre abrégé: Obes Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9106714
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2022
04 2022
Historique:
received:
22
07
2021
accepted:
02
12
2021
revised:
13
11
2021
pubmed:
11
1
2022
medline:
27
4
2022
entrez:
10
1
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) offers a novel bariatric procedure. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates observational and comparative studies evaluating SADI-S, with meta-analysis comparing outcomes to other malabsorptive procedures (MPs). Systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted in March 2021. The study followed PRISMA guidelines. Studies evaluating SADI-S with n > 5 were included. Primary outcome was diabetes (DM) remission, and secondary outcomes included perioperative outcomes, comorbidity resolution, and weight loss. We reviewed 2285 studies with 16 included evaluating 3319 patients and 1704 (51.3%) undergoing SADI-S. SADI-S patients had increased BMI (49.6 kg/m SADI-S demonstrates improved metabolic and weight loss outcomes with lower perioperative risks. SADI-S represents a promising bariatric procedure but long-term outcomes are needed to guide future uptake.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35001254
doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05824-w
pii: 10.1007/s11695-021-05824-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1049-1063Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Hedberg J, Sundström J, Sundbom M. Duodenal switch versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: systematic review and meta-analysis of weight results, diabetes resolution and early complications in single-centre comparisons. Obes Rev. 2014;15(7):555–63.
doi: 10.1111/obr.12169
Roslin M, Tugertimur B, Zarabi S, Cottam D. Is there a better design for a bariatric procedure? The case for a single anastomosis duodenal switch. Obes Surg. 2018;28(12):4077–86.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3535-y
Bordan NS, Yashkov YI. Evolution of biliopancreatic diversion in the treatment of morbid obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Mellitus. 2017;20(3):201–9. Russian.
Risstad H, Søvik TT, Engström M, Aasheim ET, Fagerland MW, Olsén MF, et al. Five-year outcomes after laparoscopic gastric bypass and laparoscopic duodenal switch in patients with body mass index of 50 to 60: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(4):352–61.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.3579
Khalaj A, Tasdighi E, Hosseinpanah F, Mahdavi M, Valizadeh M, Farahmand E, et al. Two-year outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy versus gastric bypass: first report based on Tehran obesity treatment study (TOTS). BMC Surg. 2020;20(1):160.
doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00819-3
Sharples AJ, Mahawar K. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing long-term outcomes of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2020;30(2):664–72.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04235-2
Shoar S, Saber AA. Long-term and midterm outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(2):170–80.
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.08.011
Peterli R, Wölnerhanssen BK, Peters T, Vetter D, Kröll D, Borbély Y, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss in patients with morbid obesity: the SM-BOSS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319(3):255–65.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.20897
Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio Herrera MA, Pérez-Aguirre E, García Pérez JC, Cabrerizo L, DíezValladares L, et al. Proximal duodenal–ileal end-to-side bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: proposed technique. Obes Surg. 2007;17(12):1614–8.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-007-9287-8
Brown WA, Ooi G, Higa K, Himpens J, Torres A, Sadi-S/Oads IFatfrtlo. Single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy/one anastomosis duodenal switch (SADI-S/OADS) IFSO position statement. Obes Surg. 2018;28(5):1207–16.
Brown WA, de Leon Ballesteros GP, Ooi G, Higa K, Himpens J, Torres A, et al. Single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy/one anastomosis duodenal switch (SADI-S/OADS) IFSO Position Statement-update 2020. Obes Surg. 2021;31(1):3–25.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05134-7
ChiCtr. Morbid obesity treatment by SADI-S: a multi-center randomized controlled clinical trial. 2020. http://www.who.int/trialsearch/Trial2aspx?TrialID=ChiCTR2000036266 . Accessed 12 Aug 2021
Nct. Standard duodenal switch vs. single anastomosis duodeno-ileostomy duodenal switch. 2019. https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03938571 . Accessed 12 Aug 2021
Robert M, Poghosyan T, Delaunay D, Pelascini E, Iceta S, Sterkers A, et al. Prospective multicentre randomised trial comparing the efficacy and safety of single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB): SADISLEEVE study protocol. BMJ open. 2020;10(9):e037576.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037576
Nct. Laparoscopic single-anastomosis duodenal-jejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic duodenal switch. 2016. https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02692469 . Accessed 12 Aug 2021
Nct. Single-anastomosis duodeno ileal bypass (SADI) versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. 2018. https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03610256 . Accessed 12 Aug 2021
Enochs P, Bull J, Surve A, Cottam D, Bovard S, Bruce J, et al. Comparative analysis of the single-anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) to established bariatric procedures: an assessment of 2-year postoperative data illustrating weight loss, type 2 diabetes, and nutritional status in a single US center. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16(1):24–33.
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.10.008
Yashkov Y, Bordan N, Torres A, Malykhina A, Bekuzarov D. SADI-S 250 vs Roux-en-Y duodenal switch (RY-DS): results of 5-year observational study. Obes Surg. 2021;31(2):570–9.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05031-z
Surve A, Cottam D, Richards C, Medlin W, Belnap L. A matched cohort comparison of long-term outcomes of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) versus single-anastomosis duodeno-ileostomy with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). Obes Surg. 2020.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLOS Medicine. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283(15):2008–12.
doi: 10.1001/jama.283.15.2008
Ghuman A, Kavalukas S, Sharp SP, Wexner SD. Clinical role of fluorescence imaging in colorectal surgery - an updated review. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2020.
Haddaway NR, Collins AM, Coughlin D, Kirk S. The role of Google Scholar in evidence reviews and its applicability to grey literature searching. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0138237.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138237
Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73(9):712–6.
doi: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x
Khan W, Khan M, Alradwan H, Williams R, Simunovic N, Ayeni OR. Utility of intra-articular hip injections for femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review. Orthop J Sports Med. 2015;3(9):2325967115601030.
pubmed: 26535395
pmcid: 4622294
Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Bmj. 2019;366:l4898.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898
Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Method. 2014;14(1):135.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-135
Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2003;327(7414):557–60.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
Moustafa AAS, Eskandaros MS, Ebrahim AH, Mansour HK, Ghali MMN. Comparative study between Single Anastmosis Duodeno-ileal Bypass and one anastomosis-gastric bypass as regard remission of type-2 DM after application of DIAREM Scoring System. Med Sci. 2020;24(106):4098–107.
Shoar S, Poliakin L, Rubenstein R, Saber AA. Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal switch (SADIS): a systematic review of efficacy and safety. Obes Surg. 2018;28(1):104–13.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2838-8
Spinos D, Skarentzos K, Esagian SM, Seymour KA, Economopoulos KP. The effectiveness of single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy/one anastomosis duodenal switch (SADI-S/OADS): an updated systematic review. Obes Surg. 2021.
Neichoy B, Cottam D, Cottam S, Schniederjan B, Surve A. SADI-S a surgery safe enough for same day discharge. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(10 Supplement):S64. English.
Cottam S, Ng P, Sharp L, Medlin W, Cottam DR. Single-anastomosis duodenal ileostomy with sleeve is a safe and effective option for patients in an ambulatory surgical center. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(11):1990–3.
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.09.062
Zaveri H, Surve A, Cottam D, Cottam A, Medlin W, Richards C, et al. Mid-term 4-year outcomes with single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy surgery at a single US center. Obes Surg. 2018;28(10):3062–72.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3358-x
Curbelo-Pena Y, Vilallonga-Puy R, Sanchez-Cordero S, Martin R, Roriz R, Torres A. Laparoscopic conversion from single anastomosis duodeno-jejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy to roux-en-y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2019;29(5 Supplement):1322. English.
Curell A, Vilallonga R, Fort JM, Balibrea JM, Kraft M, Alberti P, et al. Conversion from Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) for malabsorptive issues to none or less malabsorptive procedures. Obes Facts. 2016;9(SUPPL. 1):317. English.
Galvez AF, Galvez DA, Onopchenko A. Conversion of a SADI-S procedure to a Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Indications, technical details and review of the literature. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(11 Supplement):S177. English.
Balibrea JM, Vilallonga R, Hidalgo M, Ciudin A, Gonzalez O, Caubet E, et al. Mid-term results and responsiveness predictors after two-step single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2017;27(5):1302–8.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2471-y
Ansari R, Lakdawala M. Sleeve to Sadi. Obes Surg. 2018;28:107.
Almalki OM, Lee WJ, Chen JC, Ser KH, Lee YC, Chen SC. Revisional gastric bypass for failed restrictive procedures: comparison of single-anastomosis (Mini-) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2018;28(4):970–5.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2991-0
Bashah M, Aleter A, Baazaoui J, El-Menyar A, Torres A, Salama A. Single anastomosis duodeno-ileostomy (SADI-S) versus one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB) as revisional procedures for patients with weight recidivism after sleeve gastrectomy: a comparative analysis of efficacy and outcomes. Obes Surg. 2020;30(12):4715–23.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04933-2
Ceha CMM, van Wezenbeek MR, Versteegden DPA, Smulders JF, Nienhuijs SW. Matched short-term results of SADI versus GBP after sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2018;28(12):3809–14.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3415-5
Chouillard E. Revisional surgery in 2000 consecutive patients who had sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity in a single center. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(10 Supplement):S151-S2. English.
Christogianni V, Buesing M, Bemponis P, Dukovska R. Weight regain after gastric sleeve operation: our experience with SADI-S bypass. Obes Surg. 2018;28(1 Supplement 1):S29. English.
Conde M, Cerdan C, Sanchez-Pernaute A, M AR, Cabrerizo L, Talavera P, et al. Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (SADI) vs classical duodenal switch as a second step after sleeve gastrectomy in morbid obese patients with initial BMI>50KG/M2. Obes Surg. 2011;21(8):1010–1. English.
de la Cruz M, Busing M, Dukovska R, Torres AJ, Reiser M. Short- to medium-term results of single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass compared with one-anastomosis gastric bypass for weight recidivism after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16(8):1060–6.
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.04.014
Dijkhorst P, Boerboom A, Aarts E, Janssen I, Hazebroek E, Swank D, et al. Single anastomosis duodenoileal bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass following failed sleeve gastrectomy: a multicenter cohort study. Obes Surg. 2018;28(1 Supplement 1):S40-S1. English.
Godwin A, Roslin MS. Conversion of laparoscopic Roux en Y gastric bypass to single anastomosis duodenal switch/SIPS: a technique to make a safer gastro-gastric anastomosis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(11 Supplement):S78. English.
Heneghan HM, Kerrigan DD. Laparoscopic SADI-S as a salvage procedure for failed gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: how I do it. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(5):715–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.01.043
Holeczy P, Buzga M, Keher I, Bolek M, Figurova E. SADIS-new method in bariatric/metabolic surgery. Obes Facts. 2015;8(SUPPL. 1):228–9. English.
Hopkins G, Ghosh S, Bui P, Tan S. Revisional single-anastomosis gastric bypass for complicated laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for BMI over 35-a twelve-month reviewiew revisional surgery. Obes Surg. 2017;27(1 Supplement 1):928. English.
Jawad MA, Nelson L, Moon RC, Teixeira AF. Techniques of single-stage laparoscopic conversion of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass to single anastomosis bilio-pancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Obes Surg. 2017;27(4):1109–11.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2578-9
Karcz WK, Kuesters S, Grueneberger J. Duodenal switch as malabsorptive revisionary option after conventional and banded gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2012;22(9):1370. English.
Kerrigan D, Darrien J. Revision RYGB to SADIS. Obes Surg. 2020;30(SUPPL 1):S20-S.
Kulendran M, Coles S, Belchita R, Fiorani C, Lo C, Wan A, et al. SADI-S for weight regain regain after sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2020;30(SUPPL 1):S20–1.
Lasses Martinez B, Garcia Fernandez A, Ruano Campos A, Perez Jimenez A, Sanchez Pernaute A, Torres Garcia A. Single anastomosis duodenoileal bypass for weight regain after roux-en-y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2019;29(5 Supplement):1059. English.
Moon RC, Alkhairi L, Wier AJ, Teixeira AF, Jawad MA. Conversions of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass to duodenal switch (SADI-S and BPD-DS) for weight regain. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(10):4422–8.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07219-6
Wu W, Zhang P. The difference of single-anastomosis duodenal switch as a primary or a staged procedure. Obes Surg. 2019;29(3 Supplement):98. English.
Zaveri HM, Surve AK, Cottam DR, Ng PC, Sharp LS, Bermudez D, et al. Is weight loss better if staged single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass is performed within the first year of sleeve gastrectomy? Surg Obes Related Dis. 2018;14(11 Supplement):S17. English.