Potential and real drug interactions in patients treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide in clinical practice.


Journal

Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology
ISSN: 1744-7607
Titre abrégé: Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101228422

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 11 1 2022
medline: 17 3 2022
entrez: 10 1 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Abiraterone and enzalutamide, androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), are at high risk of potential drug interactions (PDIs). We aimed to describe PDIs and their management, and triggered adverse events (AEs) in clinical practice. We conducted a cross-sectional study in mCRPC patients who started treatment with abiraterone or enzalutamide in a university hospital between August 1st, 2016 and July 31st, 2020. Lexicomp® was used to identify and analyze PDIs, and the clinical records to assess their management and the occurrence of AEs. We included 173 patients: 36.8% and 93.0% treated with abiraterone and enzalutamide, respectively, had at least 1 PDI. Globally, 6.3% of PDIs had X-risk (contraindication due to high probability of AE). Treatment was modified in 9.2% of patients and 9.8% suffered AEs due to PDIs. Factors associated with a higher risk of PDIs were polypharmacy (OR= 41.0, p  0.003) and treatment with enzalutamide (OR= 128.26, p < 0.001). At least two-thirds of patients treated with ARPI suffered a PDI. Overall, abiraterone would have a more favorable PDI profile. Knowing these interaction profiles may be helpful to develop a more efficient therapeutic follow-up and to select the safest treatment.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Abiraterone and enzalutamide, androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), are at high risk of potential drug interactions (PDIs). We aimed to describe PDIs and their management, and triggered adverse events (AEs) in clinical practice.
METHODS METHODS
We conducted a cross-sectional study in mCRPC patients who started treatment with abiraterone or enzalutamide in a university hospital between August 1st, 2016 and July 31st, 2020. Lexicomp® was used to identify and analyze PDIs, and the clinical records to assess their management and the occurrence of AEs.
RESULTS RESULTS
We included 173 patients: 36.8% and 93.0% treated with abiraterone and enzalutamide, respectively, had at least 1 PDI. Globally, 6.3% of PDIs had X-risk (contraindication due to high probability of AE). Treatment was modified in 9.2% of patients and 9.8% suffered AEs due to PDIs. Factors associated with a higher risk of PDIs were polypharmacy (OR= 41.0, p  0.003) and treatment with enzalutamide (OR= 128.26, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
At least two-thirds of patients treated with ARPI suffered a PDI. Overall, abiraterone would have a more favorable PDI profile. Knowing these interaction profiles may be helpful to develop a more efficient therapeutic follow-up and to select the safest treatment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35001772
doi: 10.1080/17425255.2021.2027908
doi:

Substances chimiques

Androstenes 0
Benzamides 0
Nitriles 0
Phenylthiohydantoin 2010-15-3
enzalutamide 93T0T9GKNU
Abiraterone Acetate EM5OCB9YJ6
abiraterone G819A456D0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1467-1473

Auteurs

Juan Vicente-Valor (J)

Pharmacy Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

Vicente Escudero-Vilaplana (V)

Pharmacy Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

Roberto Collado-Borrell (R)

Pharmacy Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

Sara Pérez-Ramírez (S)

Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

Cristina Villanueva-Bueno (C)

Pharmacy Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

Álvaro Narrillos-Moraza (Á)

Pharmacy Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

Sebastián García-Sánchez (S)

Pharmacy Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

Manel Beamud-Cortés (M)

Urology Department, Hospital General Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain.

Ana Herranz (A)

Pharmacy Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

María Sanjurjo (M)

Pharmacy Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH