Potential and real drug interactions in patients treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide in clinical practice.
Cancer outpatients
abiraterone
drug interactions
enzalutamide
prostate cancer
safety
Journal
Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology
ISSN: 1744-7607
Titre abrégé: Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101228422
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Dec 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
11
1
2022
medline:
17
3
2022
entrez:
10
1
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Abiraterone and enzalutamide, androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), are at high risk of potential drug interactions (PDIs). We aimed to describe PDIs and their management, and triggered adverse events (AEs) in clinical practice. We conducted a cross-sectional study in mCRPC patients who started treatment with abiraterone or enzalutamide in a university hospital between August 1st, 2016 and July 31st, 2020. Lexicomp® was used to identify and analyze PDIs, and the clinical records to assess their management and the occurrence of AEs. We included 173 patients: 36.8% and 93.0% treated with abiraterone and enzalutamide, respectively, had at least 1 PDI. Globally, 6.3% of PDIs had X-risk (contraindication due to high probability of AE). Treatment was modified in 9.2% of patients and 9.8% suffered AEs due to PDIs. Factors associated with a higher risk of PDIs were polypharmacy (OR= 41.0, p 0.003) and treatment with enzalutamide (OR= 128.26, p < 0.001). At least two-thirds of patients treated with ARPI suffered a PDI. Overall, abiraterone would have a more favorable PDI profile. Knowing these interaction profiles may be helpful to develop a more efficient therapeutic follow-up and to select the safest treatment.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Abiraterone and enzalutamide, androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), are at high risk of potential drug interactions (PDIs). We aimed to describe PDIs and their management, and triggered adverse events (AEs) in clinical practice.
METHODS
METHODS
We conducted a cross-sectional study in mCRPC patients who started treatment with abiraterone or enzalutamide in a university hospital between August 1st, 2016 and July 31st, 2020. Lexicomp® was used to identify and analyze PDIs, and the clinical records to assess their management and the occurrence of AEs.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We included 173 patients: 36.8% and 93.0% treated with abiraterone and enzalutamide, respectively, had at least 1 PDI. Globally, 6.3% of PDIs had X-risk (contraindication due to high probability of AE). Treatment was modified in 9.2% of patients and 9.8% suffered AEs due to PDIs. Factors associated with a higher risk of PDIs were polypharmacy (OR= 41.0, p 0.003) and treatment with enzalutamide (OR= 128.26, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
At least two-thirds of patients treated with ARPI suffered a PDI. Overall, abiraterone would have a more favorable PDI profile. Knowing these interaction profiles may be helpful to develop a more efficient therapeutic follow-up and to select the safest treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35001772
doi: 10.1080/17425255.2021.2027908
doi:
Substances chimiques
Androstenes
0
Benzamides
0
Nitriles
0
Phenylthiohydantoin
2010-15-3
enzalutamide
93T0T9GKNU
Abiraterone Acetate
EM5OCB9YJ6
abiraterone
G819A456D0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM