mGluR5 binding changes during a mismatch negativity task in a multimodal protocol with [
Journal
Translational psychiatry
ISSN: 2158-3188
Titre abrégé: Transl Psychiatry
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101562664
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 01 2022
10 01 2022
Historique:
received:
12
07
2021
accepted:
30
11
2021
revised:
22
11
2021
entrez:
11
1
2022
pubmed:
12
1
2022
medline:
1
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Currently, the metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) is the subject of several lines of research in the context of neurology and is of high interest as a target for positron-emission tomography (PET). Here, we assessed the feasibility of using [
Identifiants
pubmed: 35013095
doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01763-3
pii: 10.1038/s41398-021-01763-3
pmc: PMC8748790
doi:
Substances chimiques
3-(6-methylpyridin-2-ylethynyl)cyclohex-2-enone-O-methyloxime
0
Carbon Radioisotopes
0
GRM5 protein, human
0
Oximes
0
Pyridines
0
Receptor, Metabotropic Glutamate 5
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Purves D, Augustine G, Fitzpatrick D, Katz L, LaMantia AS, McNamara JO, et al. Neuroscience. edition n, editor. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates; 2001.
Akkus F, Treyer V, Ametamey SM, Johayem A, Buck A, Hasler G. Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 neuroimaging in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2017;183:95–101.
pubmed: 27847228
doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.11.008
Akkus F, Mihov Y, Treyer V, Ametamey SM, Johayem A, Senn S, et al. Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 binding in male patients with alcohol use disorder. Transl Psychiatry 2018;8:17.
pubmed: 29317611
pmcid: 5802584
doi: 10.1038/s41398-017-0066-6
Sanacora G, Zarate CA, Krystal JH, Manji HK. Targeting the glutamatergic system to develop novel, improved therapeutics for mood disorders. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2008;7:426–37.
pubmed: 18425072
pmcid: 2715836
doi: 10.1038/nrd2462
Milella MS, Marengo L, Larcher K, Fotros A, Dagher A, Rosa-Neto P, et al. Limbic system mGluR5 availability in cocaine dependent subjects: a high-resolution PET [11C]ABP688 study. Neuroimage 2014;98:195–202.
pubmed: 24795154
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.061
DeLorenzo C, Sovago J, Gardus J, Xu J, Yang J, Behrje R, et al. Characterization of brain mGluR5 binding in a pilot study of late-life major depressive disorder using positron emission tomography and [11C]ABP688. Transl Psychiatry 2015;5:e693.
pubmed: 26645628
pmcid: 5068588
doi: 10.1038/tp.2015.189
Pillai RLI, Tipre DN. Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 – a promising target in drug development and neuroimaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2016;43:1151–70.
pubmed: 26743895
doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3301-5
Miyake N, Skinbjerg M, Easwaramoorthy B, Kumar D, Girgis RR, Xu X, et al. Imaging changes in glutamate transmission in vivo with the metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 tracer [11C] ABP688 and N-acetylcysteine challenge. Biol Psychiatry 2011;69:822–4.
pubmed: 21288506
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.12.023
Ametamey SM, Kessler LJ, Honer M, Wyss MT, Buck A, Hintermann S, et al. Radiosynthesis and preclinical evaluation of 11C-ABP688 as a probe for imaging the metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5. J Nucl Med 2006;47:698–705.
pubmed: 16595505
DeLorenzo C, DellaGioia N, Bloch M, Sanacora G, Nabulsi N, Abdallah C, et al. In vivo ketamine-induced changes in [11C]ABP688 binding to metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5. Biol Psychiatry 2015;77:266–75.
pubmed: 25156701
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.06.024
Esterlis I, DellaGioia N, Pietrzak RH, Matuskey D, Nabulsi N, Abdallah CG, et al. Ketamine-induced reduction in mGluR5 availability is associated with an antidepressant response: an [11C]ABP688 and PET imaging study in depression. Mol Psychiatry 2018;23:824–32.
pubmed: 28397841
doi: 10.1038/mp.2017.58
Holmes SE, Gallezot J-D, Davis MT, DellaGioia N, Matuskey D, Nabulsi N, et al. Measuring the effects of ketamine on mGluR5 using [18F]FPEB and PET. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2019;40:2254–64.
pubmed: 31744389
pmcid: 7585925
doi: 10.1177/0271678X19886316
Nagai T, Kirihara K, Tada M, Koshiyama D, Koike S, Suga M, et al. Reduced mismatch negativity is associated with increased plasma level of glutamate in first-episode psychosis. Sci Rep. 2017;7:2258.
pubmed: 28536477
pmcid: 5442101
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02267-1
Naatanen R, Paavilainen P, Tiitinen H, Jiang D, Alho K. Attention and mismatch negativity. Psychophysiology 1993;30:436–50.
pubmed: 8416070
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb02067.x
Garrido MI, Kilner JM, Stephan KE, Friston KJ. The mismatch negativity: a review of underlying mechanisms. Clin Neurophysiol 2009;120:453–63.
pubmed: 19181570
pmcid: 2671031
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.11.029
Sams M, Paavilainen P, Alho K, Naatanen R. Auditory frequency discrimination and event-related potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1985;62:437–48.
pubmed: 2415340
doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(85)90054-1
van Zuijen TL, Sussman E, Winkler I, Naatanen R, Tervaniemi M. Auditory organization of sound sequences by a temporal or numerical regularity-a mismatch negativity study comparing musicians and non-musicians. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2005;23:270–6.
pubmed: 15820634
doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.10.007
van Zuijen TL, Simoens VL, Paavilainen P, Naatanen R, Tervaniemi M. Implicit, intuitive, and explicit knowledge of abstract regularities in a sound sequence: an event-related brain potential study. J Cogn Neurosci 2006;18:1292–303.
pubmed: 16859415
doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.8.1292
Pekkonen E, Huotilainen M, Katila H, Karhu J, Naatanen R, Tiihonen J. Altered parallel auditory processing in schizophrenia patients. Schizophr Bull 1999;25:601–7.
pubmed: 10478792
doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033404
Naatanen R, Kahkonen S. Central auditory dysfunction in schizophrenia as revealed by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic equivalent MMNm: a review. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2009;12:125–35.
pubmed: 18771603
doi: 10.1017/S1461145708009322
Domján N, Csifcsák G, Drótos G, Janka Z, Szendi I. Different patterns of auditory information processing deficits in chronic schizophrenia and bipolar disorder with psychotic features. Schizophrenia Res 2012;139:253–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.06.002
Umbricht D, Schmid L, Koller R, Vollenweider FX, Hell D, Javitt DC. Ketamine-induced deficits in auditory and visual context-dependent processing in healthy volunteers: implications for models of cognitive deficits in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2000;57:1139–47.
pubmed: 11115327
doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.57.12.1139
Kreitschmann-Andermahr I, Rosburg T, Demme U, Gaser E, Nowak H, Sauer H. Effect of ketamine on the neuromagnetic mismatch field in healthy humans. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2001;12:109–16.
pubmed: 11489614
doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00043-X
Umbricht D, Koller R, Vollenweider FX, Schmid L. Mismatch negativity predicts psychotic experiences induced by NMDA receptor antagonist in healthy volunteers. Biol Psychiatry 2002;51:400–6.
pubmed: 11904134
doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(01)01242-2
Heekeren K, Daumann J, Neukirch A, Stock C, Kawohl W, Norra C, et al. Mismatch negativity generation in the human 5HT2A agonist and NMDA antagonist model of psychosis. Psychopharmacol 2008;199:77–88.
doi: 10.1007/s00213-008-1129-4
Neuner I, Rajkumar R, Brambilla CR, Ramkiran S, Ruch A, Orth L, et al. Simultaneous PET-MR-EEG: Technology, challenges and application in clinical neuroscience. IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci 2019;3:377–85.
doi: 10.1109/TRPMS.2018.2886525
Elmenhorst D, Mertens K, Kroll T, Oskamp A, Ermert J, Elmenhorst EM, et al. Circadian variation of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 availability in the rat brain. J Sleep Res 2016;25:754–61.
pubmed: 27357735
doi: 10.1111/jsr.12432
Herzog H, Langen KJ, Weirich C, Rota Kops E, Kaffanke J, Tellmann L, et al. High resolution BrainPET combined with simultaneous MRI. Nuklearmedizin 2011;50:74–82.
pubmed: 21286660
doi: 10.3413/Nukmed-0347-10-09
Burger C, Deschwanden A, Ametamey S, Johayem A, Mancosu B, Wyss M, et al. Evaluation of a bolus/infusion protocol for 11C-ABP688, a PET tracer for mGluR5. Nucl Med Biol 2010;37:845–51.
pubmed: 20870160
doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2010.04.107
Akkus F, Terbeck S, Ametamey SM, Rufer M, Treyer V, Burger C, et al. Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 binding in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2014;17:1915–22.
pubmed: 24833114
doi: 10.1017/S1461145714000716
Deschwanden A, Karolewicz B, Feyissa AM, Treyer V, Ametamey SM, Johayem A, et al. Reduced metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 density in major depression determined by [11C]ABP688 PET and postmortem study. Am J Psychiatry 2011;168:727–34.
pubmed: 21498461
pmcid: 3129412
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.09111607
Del Guerra A, Ahmad S, Avram M, Belcari N, Berneking A, Biagi L, et al. TRIMAGE: A dedicated trimodality (PET/MR/EEG) imaging tool for schizophrenia. Eur Psychiatry 2018;50:7–20.
pubmed: 29358016
doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.11.007
Rota Kops E, Herzog H. Template-based attenuation correction of PET in hybrid MR-PET scanners. J Nucl Med 2008;49:162P.
Brambilla, Scheins J, Issa A, Tellmann L, Herzog H, Rota Kops E, et al. Bias evaluation and reduction in 3D OP-OSEM reconstruction in dynamic equilibrium PET studies with 11C-labeled for binding potential analysis. PLoS ONE 2021;16:e0245580.
pubmed: 33481896
pmcid: 7822533
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245580
Picard Y, Thompson CJ. Motion correction of PET images using multiple acquisition frames. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1997;16:137–44.
pubmed: 9101323
doi: 10.1109/42.563659
Brambilla, Zeusseu O, Scheins J, Kops ER, Tellmann L, Shah NJ, et al. Annual Congress of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine October 12–16, 2019 Barcelona, Spain. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019;46:1–952.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04486-2
Scheins J, Brambilla CR, Mauler J, Rota Kops E, Tellmann L, Lerche CW, et al. Image-based Motion Correction for the Siemens Hybrid MR/BrainPET Scanner. 57 Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Nuklearmedizin 2019; Bremen, Germany 2019.
Hammers A, Allom R, Koepp MJ, Free SL, Myers R, Lemieux L, et al. Three-dimensional maximum probability atlas of the human brain, with particular reference to the temporal lobe. Hum Brain Mapp 2003;19:224–47.
pubmed: 12874777
pmcid: 6871794
doi: 10.1002/hbm.10123
Shirer WR, Ryali S, Rykhlevskaia E, Menon V, Greicius MD. Decoding subject-driven cognitive states with whole-brain connectivity patterns. Cereb Cortex 2012;22:158–65.
pubmed: 21616982
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr099
Smart K, Cox SML, Nagano-Saito A, Rosa-Neto P, Leyton M, Benkelfat C. Test-retest variability of [11C]ABP688 estimates of metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 availability in humans. Synapse. 2018;72:e22041.
pubmed: 29935121
doi: 10.1002/syn.22041
DeLorenzo C, Gallezot JD, Gardus J, Yang J, Planeta B, Nabulsi N, et al. In vivo variation in same-day estimates of metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 binding using [11C]ABP688 and [18F]FPEB. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2017;37:2716–27.
pubmed: 27742888
doi: 10.1177/0271678X16673646
Delorme A, Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods 2004;134:9–21.
pubmed: 15102499
doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
Niazy RK, Beckmann CF, Iannetti GD, Brady JM, Smith SM. Removal of FMRI environment artifacts from EEG data using optimal basis sets. NeuroImage 2005;28:720–37.
pubmed: 16150610
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.067
Mullen TR, Kothe CAE, Chi YM, Ojeda A, Kerth T, Makeig S, et al. Real-Time neuroimaging and cognitive monitoring using wearable dry EEG. IEEE Trans bio-Med Eng 2015;62:2553–67.
doi: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2481482
Marino M, Liu Q, Koudelka V, Porcaro C, Hlinka J, Wenderoth N, et al. Adaptive optimal basis set for BCG artifact removal in simultaneous EEG-fMRI. Sci Rep. 2018;8:8902.
pubmed: 29891929
pmcid: 5995808
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27187-6
Gomez-Herrero G, Clercq WD, Anwar H, Kara O, Egiazarian K, Huffel SV, et al. editors. Automatic Removal of Ocular Artifacts in the EEG without an EOG Reference Channel. Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Signal Processing Symposium - NORSIG 2006; 2006 7-92006.
Bell AJ, Sejnowski TJ. An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Comput 1995;7:1129–59.
pubmed: 7584893
doi: 10.1162/neco.1995.7.6.1129
Winkler I, Haufe S, Tangermann M. Automatic classification of artifactual ICA-components for artifact removal in EEG signals. Behav Brain Funct 2011;7:30.
pubmed: 21810266
pmcid: 3175453
doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-7-30
Cousineau D. Representing error bars in within-subject designs in typical software packages. The Quantitative Methods for. Psychology 2014;10:12.
Holmes SE, Gallezot J-D, Davis MT, DellaGioia N, Matuskey D, Nabulsi N, et al. Measuring the effects of ketamine on mGluR5 using [
Moghaddam B, Adams B, Verma A, Daly D. Activation of glutamatergic neurotransmission by ketamine: a novel step in the pathway from NMDA receptor blockade to dopaminergic and cognitive disruptions associated with the prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci 1997;17:2921–7.
pubmed: 9092613
pmcid: 6573099
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-08-02921.1997
Chowdhury GM, Behar KL, Cho W, Thomas MA, Rothman DL, Sanacora G. 1H-[13C]-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy measures of ketamine’s effect on amino acid neurotransmitter metabolism. Biol Psychiatry 2012;71:1022–5.
pubmed: 22169441
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.11.006
Fitzgerald K, Todd J. Making Sense of Mismatch Negativity. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:468.
pubmed: 32595529
pmcid: 7300203
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00468
Escera C, Alho K, Schröger E, Winkler I. Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials. Audio Neurootol 2000;5:151–66.
doi: 10.1159/000013877
Lakatos P, O’Connell MN, Barczak A, McGinnis T, Neymotin S, Schroeder CE, et al. The thalamocortical circuit of auditory mismatch negativity. Biol Psychiatry 2020;87:770–80.
pubmed: 31924325
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.10.029
Cacciaglia R, Escera C, Slabu L, Grimm S, Sanjuán A, Ventura-Campos N, et al. Involvement of the human midbrain and thalamus in auditory deviance detection. Neuropsychologia 2015;68:51–8.
pubmed: 25556848
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.01.001
Jin Y, Yang H, Zhang F, Wang J, Liu H, Yang X, et al. The medial thalamus plays an important role in the cognitive and emotional modulation of orofacial pain: a functional magnetic resonance imaging-based study. Front Neurol 2020;11:589125.
pubmed: 33551953
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.589125
Hwang K, Bertolero MA, Liu WB, D’Esposito M. The human thalamus is an integrative hub for functional brain networks. J Neurosci 2017;37:5594–607.
pubmed: 28450543
pmcid: 5469300
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0067-17.2017
Bartlett EL. The organization and physiology of the auditory thalamus and its role in processing acoustic features important for speech perception. Brain Lang 2013;126:29–48.
pubmed: 23725661
pmcid: 3707394
doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.03.003
Gaebler AJ, Mathiak K, Koten JW Jr., Konig AA, Koush Y, Weyer D, et al. Auditory mismatch impairments are characterized by core neural dysfunctions in schizophrenia. Brain 2015;138:1410–23.
pubmed: 25743635
pmcid: 5963408
doi: 10.1093/brain/awv049
Buckner RL, Andrews-Hanna JR, Schacter DL. The brain’s default network: anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008;1124:1–38.
pubmed: 18400922
doi: 10.1196/annals.1440.011
Hahn B, Ross TJ, Stein EA. Cingulate activation increases dynamically with response speed under stimulus unpredictability. Cereb Cortex 2007;17:1664–71.
pubmed: 16963517
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhl075
Deng Z, Wu J, Gao J, Hu Y, Zhang Y, Wang Y, et al. Segregated precuneus network and default mode network in naturalistic imaging. Brain Struct Funct 2019;224:3133–44.
pubmed: 31515678
doi: 10.1007/s00429-019-01953-2
Cunningham SI, Tomasi D, Volkow ND. Structural and functional connectivity of the precuneus and thalamus to the default mode network. Hum Brain Mapp 2017;38:938–56.
pubmed: 27739612
doi: 10.1002/hbm.23429
van den Heuvel MP, Mandl RC, Kahn RS, Hulshoff, Pol HE. Functionally linked resting-state networks reflect the underlying structural connectivity architecture of the human brain. Hum Brain Mapp 2009;30:3127–41.
pubmed: 19235882
pmcid: 6870902
doi: 10.1002/hbm.20737
van den Heuvel MP, Sporns O. Network hubs in the human brain. Trends Cogn Sci 2013;17:683–96.
pubmed: 24231140
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.012
Gur RC, Turetsky BI, Loughead J, Waxman J, Snyder W, Ragland JD, et al. Hemodynamic responses in neural circuitries for detection of visual target and novelty: An event-related fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp 2007;28:263–74.
pubmed: 17133387
doi: 10.1002/hbm.20319
Harms L, Parras GG, Michie PT, Malmierca MS. The role of glutamate neurotransmission in mismatch negativity (MMN), a measure of auditory synaptic plasticity and change-detection. Neuroscience 2021;456:106–13.
pubmed: 32045628
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.01.046
Kompus K, Westerhausen R, Craven AR, Kreegipuu K, Poldver N, Passow S, et al. Resting-state glutamatergic neurotransmission is related to the peak latency of the auditory mismatch negativity (MMN) for duration deviants: An 1H-MRS-EEG study. Psychophysiology 2015;52:1131–9.
pubmed: 25917405
doi: 10.1111/psyp.12445
Stone JM, Bramon E, Pauls A, Sumich A, McGuire PK. Thalamic neurochemical abnormalities in individuals with prodromal symptoms of schizophrenia - relationship to auditory event-related potentials. Psychiatry Res 2010;183:174–6.
pubmed: 20620033
doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2010.05.004
Hwang K, Bertolero MA, Liu WB, Esposito M. The human thalamus is an integrative hub for functional brain networks. J Neurosci 2017;37:5594.
pubmed: 28450543
pmcid: 5469300
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0067-17.2017
Jones EG. The Thalamus: Plenum Press; 1985.
Halassa MM, Acsády L. Thalamic Inhibition: Diverse Sources, Diverse Scales. Trends Neurosci 2016;39:680–93.
pubmed: 27589879
pmcid: 5048590
doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2016.08.001
Pressler RT, Regehr WG. Metabotropic glutamate receptors drive global persistent inhibition in the visual thalamus. J Neurosci 2013;33:2494–506.
pubmed: 23392677
pmcid: 3711716
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3458-12.2013
Cheng C-H, Wang P-N, Hsu W-Y, Lin Y-Y. Inadequate inhibition of redundant auditory inputs in Alzheimer’s disease: An MEG study. Biol Psychol 2012;89:365–73.
pubmed: 22155475
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.11.010
Ji L-L, Zhang Y-Y, Zhang L, He B, Lu G-H. Mismatch negativity latency as a biomarker of amnestic mild cognitive impairment in Chinese rural elders. Front Aging Neurosci. 2015;7:22.
pubmed: 25814949
pmcid: 4357324
doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00022
Umbricht D, Krljes S. Mismatch negativity in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. Schizophr Res 2005;76:1–23.
pubmed: 15927795
doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2004.12.002
Näätänen R. Attention and brain function. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 1992.
Näätänen R, Schröger E, Karakas S, Tervaniemi M, Paavilainen P. Development of a memory trace for a complex sound in the human brain. Neuroreport 1993;4:503–6.
pubmed: 8513127
doi: 10.1097/00001756-199305000-00010