Phase 2, randomized multi oral immunotherapy with omalizumab 'real life' study.
IgE
IgG4
maintenance dose
omalizumab
oral immunotherapy
Journal
Allergy
ISSN: 1398-9995
Titre abrégé: Allergy
Pays: Denmark
ID NLM: 7804028
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2022
06 2022
Historique:
revised:
17
12
2021
received:
13
10
2021
accepted:
22
12
2021
pubmed:
12
1
2022
medline:
7
6
2022
entrez:
11
1
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is frequently discontinued due to adverse events (AEs) and current data suggests that lowering OIT doses can minimize severity and frequency of AEs. However, the minimum daily dose that can enable desensitization and induce immune responses in multi-food OIT (mOIT) is unknown. Participants aged 2-25 years with multi-food allergies were pretreated with fixed-dose omalizumab (150 mg, 3 doses, every 4 weeks), and randomized 1:1 to receive mOIT to a total maintenance dose of either 300 or 1200 mg total protein, (total dose includes at least two and up to a max of five allergens) and then transitioned to real-food protein equivalents after 18 weeks of treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects with increases in IgG4/IgE ratio of at least 2 allergens by ≥25% from baseline after 18 weeks of therapy. The primary efficacy and safety analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. Sixty participants were enrolled across two sites. Seventy percent of participants in both arms showed changes in sIgG4/sIgE ratio in at least 2 allergens with no difference between the treatment groups (OR [95% CI] = 1.00 [0.29, 3.49]). Overall, there were no differences in AEs between the 300 and 1200 mg groups (19% vs. 17%, p = .69), respectively. Our data suggest that plasma marker changes are induced early, even at a total protein dose of 300 mg inclusive of multiple allergens when mOIT is combined with fixed-dose omalizumab. Identification of optimal mOIT dosing with adjunct omalizumab is needed for the long-term success of OIT. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03181009).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is frequently discontinued due to adverse events (AEs) and current data suggests that lowering OIT doses can minimize severity and frequency of AEs. However, the minimum daily dose that can enable desensitization and induce immune responses in multi-food OIT (mOIT) is unknown.
METHODS
Participants aged 2-25 years with multi-food allergies were pretreated with fixed-dose omalizumab (150 mg, 3 doses, every 4 weeks), and randomized 1:1 to receive mOIT to a total maintenance dose of either 300 or 1200 mg total protein, (total dose includes at least two and up to a max of five allergens) and then transitioned to real-food protein equivalents after 18 weeks of treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects with increases in IgG4/IgE ratio of at least 2 allergens by ≥25% from baseline after 18 weeks of therapy. The primary efficacy and safety analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population.
RESULTS
Sixty participants were enrolled across two sites. Seventy percent of participants in both arms showed changes in sIgG4/sIgE ratio in at least 2 allergens with no difference between the treatment groups (OR [95% CI] = 1.00 [0.29, 3.49]). Overall, there were no differences in AEs between the 300 and 1200 mg groups (19% vs. 17%, p = .69), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Our data suggest that plasma marker changes are induced early, even at a total protein dose of 300 mg inclusive of multiple allergens when mOIT is combined with fixed-dose omalizumab. Identification of optimal mOIT dosing with adjunct omalizumab is needed for the long-term success of OIT.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03181009).
Substances chimiques
Allergens
0
Immunologic Factors
0
Omalizumab
2P471X1Z11
Immunoglobulin E
37341-29-0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03181009']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1873-1884Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : U19 AI104209
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI140134
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : UM1 AI130839
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2022 European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Gupta RS, Warren CM, Smith BM, et al. The public health impact of parent-reported childhood food allergies in the United States. Pediatrics. 2018;142(6):e20181235.
Gupta RS, Warren CM, Smith BM, et al. Prevalence and severity of food allergies among US adults. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(1):e185630.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Palforzia. 2020; https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/allergenics/palforzia. Accessed August 30, 2020.
Primeau MN, Kagan R, Joseph L, et al. The psychological burden of peanut allergy as perceived by adults with peanut allergy and the parents of peanut-allergic children. Clin Exp Allergy. 2000;30(8):1135-1143.
Springston EE, Smith B, Shulruff J, Pongracic J, Holl J, Gupta RS. Variations in quality of life among caregivers of food allergic children. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2010;105(4):287-294.
Fiocchi A, Artesani MC, Riccardi C, et al. Impact of omalizumab on food allergy in patients treated for asthma: a real-life study. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019;7(6):1901-1909 e1905.
Nurmatov U, Devereux G, Worth A, Healy L, Sheikh A. Effectiveness and safety of orally administered immunotherapy for food allergies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Nutr. 2014;111(1):12-22.
Nachshon L, Goldberg MR, Katz Y, Levy MB, Elizur A. Long-term outcome of peanut oral immunotherapy-real-life experience. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2018;29(5):519-526.
Savilahti EM, Kuitunen M, Savilahti E, Makela MJ. Specific antibodies in oral immunotherapy for cow's milk allergy: kinetics and prediction of clinical outcome. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2014;164(1):32-39.
Wright BL, Kulis M, Orgel KA, et al. Component-resolved analysis of IgA, IgE, and IgG4 during egg OIT identifies markers associated with sustained unresponsiveness. Allergy. 2016;71(11):1552-1560.
Kulis M, Yue X, Guo R, et al. High- and low-dose oral immunotherapy similarly suppress pro-allergic cytokines and basophil activation in young children. Clin Exp Allergy. 2019;49(2):180-189.
Santos AF, Brough HA. Making the most of in vitro tests to diagnose food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017;5(2):237-248.
Jones SM, Pons L, Roberts JL, et al. Clinical efficacy and immune regulation with peanut oral immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;124(2):292-300, 300.e291-297.
Vickery BP, Lin J, Kulis M, et al. Peanut oral immunotherapy modifies IgE and IgG 4 responses to major peanut allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;131(1):128-134. e123.
Varshney P, Jones SM, Scurlock AM, et al. A randomized controlled study of peanut oral immunotherapy: clinical desensitization and modulation of the allergic response. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127(3):654-660.
Andorf S, Purington N, Kumar D, et al. A phase 2 randomized controlled multisite study using omalizumab-facilitated rapid desensitization to test continued vs discontinued dosing in multifood allergic individuals. EClinicalMedicine. 2019;7:27-38.
Andorf S, Purington N, Block WM, et al. Anti-IgE treatment with oral immunotherapy in multifood allergic participants: a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;3(2):85-94.
Chinthrajah RS, Purington N, Andorf S, et al. Sustained outcomes in oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy (POISED study): a large, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study. Lancet. 2019;394(10207):1437-1449.
Jones SM, Burks AW, Keet C, et al. Long-term treatment with egg oral immunotherapy enhances sustained unresponsiveness that persists after cessation of therapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;137(4):1117-1127. e1110.
Nagakura KI, Yanagida N, Sato S, et al. Low-dose oral immunotherapy for children with anaphylactic peanut allergy in Japan. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2018;29(5):512-518.
Reier-Nilsen T, Michelsen MM, Lodrup Carlsen KC, et al. Feasibility of desensitizing children highly allergic to peanut by high-dose oral immunotherapy. Allergy. 2019;74(2):337-348.
Matricardi PM, Kleine-Tebbe J, Hoffmann HJ, et al. EAACI molecular allergology user's guide. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2016;27(S23):1-250.
Lewis MO, Brown-Whitehorn TF, Burke DD, et al. Life after peanut immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;139(2):AB387.
Wasserman RL, Hague AR, Pence DM, et al. Real-world experience with peanut oral immunotherapy: lessons learned from 270 patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019;7(2):418-426. e414.
Cildag S, Senturk T. The effect of omalizumab treatment on IgE and other immunoglobulin levels in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria and its association with treatment response. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2018;35(5):516-519.
Lowe PJ, Georgiou P, Canvin J. Revision of omalizumab dosing table for dosing every 4 instead of 2 weeks for specific ranges of bodyweight and baseline IgE. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015;71(1):68-77.
Vickery BP, Berglund JP, Burk CM, et al. Early oral immunotherapy in peanut-allergic preschool children is safe and highly effective. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;139(1):173-181. e178.
Maeta A, Matsushima M, Muraki N, et al. Low-dose oral immunotherapy using low-egg-allergen cookies for severe egg-allergic children reduces allergy severity and affects allergen-specific antibodies in serum. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2018;175(1-2):70-76.
Yanagida N, Sato S, Asaumi T, Okada Y, Ogura K, Ebisawa M. A single-center, case-control study of low-dose-induction oral immunotherapy with cow's milk. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2015;168(2):131-137.
Yanagida N, Sato S, Asaumi T, Nagakura K, Ogura K, Ebisawa M. Safety and efficacy of low-dose oral immunotherapy for hen's egg allergy in children. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2016;171(3-4):265-268.
Zaidi AK, Saini SS, Macglashan DW Jr. Regulation of Syk kinase and FcRbeta expression in human basophils during treatment with omalizumab. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;125(4):902-908 e907.
MacGlashan DW Jr, Savage JH, Wood RA, Saini SS. Suppression of the basophil response to allergen during treatment with omalizumab is dependent on 2 competing factors. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;130(5):1130-1135 e1135.
Macglashan DW Jr, Saini SS. Omalizumab increases the intrinsic sensitivity of human basophils to IgE-mediated stimulation. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;132(4):906-911. e901-904.
Adatia A, Clarke AE, Yanishevsky Y, Ben-Shoshan M. Sesame allergy: current perspectives. J Asthma Allergy. 2017;10:141-151.
Soller L, Abrams EM, Carr S, et al. First real-world safety analysis of preschool peanut oral immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019;7(8):2759-2767 e2755.
Aimmune Therapeutics. Take the power back from peanuts. 2020; https://www.palforzia.com/. Accessed September 2, 2020.
Salmivesi S, Korppi M. The time has come to stop placebo-controlled trials of milk oral immunotherapy and focus on real-life studies. Acta Paediatr. 2018;107(11):1855-1856.
Greenhawt M, Marsh R, Gilbert H, Sicherer S, DunnGalvin A, Matlock D. Understanding caregiver goals, benefits, and acceptable risks of peanut allergy therapies. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018;121(5):575-579.
Dunlop JH, Keet CA. Goals and motivations of families pursuing oral immunotherapy for food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019;7(2):662-663. e618.
Hourihane JO, Grimshaw KE, Lewis SA, et al. Does severity of low-dose, double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges reflect severity of allergic reactions to peanut in the community? Clin Exp Allergy. 2005;35(9):1227-1233.
Pettersson ME, Koppelman GH, Flokstra-de Blok BMJ, Kollen BJ, Dubois AEJ. Prediction of the severity of allergic reactions to foods. Allergy. 2018;73(7):1532-1540.
Holgate ST, Chuchalin AG, Hebert J, et al. Efficacy and safety of a recombinant anti-immunoglobulin E antibody (omalizumab) in severe allergic asthma. Clin Exp Allergy. 2004;34(4):632-638.
Brandstrom J, Vetander M, Lilja G, et al. Individually dosed omalizumab: an effective treatment for severe peanut allergy. Clin Exp Allergy. 2017;47(4):540-550.
Chang TW, Chen J-B, Chu C-Y. The pharmacological mechanisms of omalizumab in patients with very high IgE levels-Clues from studies on atopic dermatitis. Dermatologica Sinica. 2012;30(4):147-153.
Metz M, Schutz A, Weller K, et al. Omalizumab is effective in cold urticaria-results of a randomized placebo-controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;140(3):864-867 e865.
Burks AW, Jones SM, Wood RA, et al. Oral immunotherapy for treatment of egg allergy in children. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(3):233-243.
Vickery BP, Scurlock AM, Kulis M, et al. Sustained unresponsiveness to peanut in subjects who have completed peanut oral immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133(2):468-475.
Wood RA, Kim JS, Lindblad R, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of omalizumab combined with oral immunotherapy for the treatment of cow's milk allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;137(4):1103-1110.e1111.