Outcome of esophageal atresia: inborn versus outborn patients.


Journal

Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus
ISSN: 1442-2050
Titre abrégé: Dis Esophagus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8809160

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Aug 2022
Historique:
received: 26 07 2021
revised: 22 11 2021
pubmed: 12 1 2022
medline: 17 8 2022
entrez: 11 1 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Esophageal atresia (EA) is a rare congenital disease which is usually not of the detected prenatally. Due to the lack of prenatal diagnosis, some newborns with EA are born outside of specialized centers. Nevertheless, centralized care of EA has been proposed, even if a clear volume-outcome association in EA management remains unconfirmed. Furthermore, whether outcomes differ between outborn and inborn patients with EA has not been systematically investigated. Therefore, this single-center, retrospective study aimed to investigate EA management and outcomes with a special focus on inborn versus outborn patients. The following data were extracted from the medical records of infants with EA from 2009 to 2019: EA type, associated anomalies, complications, and long-term outcome. Patients were allocated into inborn and outborn groups. Altogether, 57 patients were included. Five patients were excluded (referral before surgery, loss of data, death before surgery [n = 1], and incorrect diagnosis [diverticulum, n = 1]). Among all patients, the overall survival rate was 96%, with no mortalities among outborn patients. The overall hospitalization period was shorter for outborn patients. The median follow-up durations were 3.8 years and 3.2 years for inborn and outborn patients, respectively. Overall, 15% of patients underwent delayed primary anastomosis (long-gap atresia [n = 4] and other reasons [n = 4]). Early complications included three anastomotic leakages and one post-operative fistula; 28% of patients developed strictures, which required dilatation, and 38% of patients showed relevant gastroesophageal reflux, which required fundoplication, without any differences between the groups. The two groups had comparable low mortality and expected high morbidity with no significant differences in outcome. The outborn group showed nonsignificant trends toward lower morbidity and shorter hospitalization periods, which might be explained by the overall better clinical status.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35016219
pii: 6500727
doi: 10.1093/dote/doab092
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Denise Schlee (D)

Department of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt/M., Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Germany.

Till-Martin Theilen (TM)

Department of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt/M., Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Germany.

Henning Fiegel (H)

Department of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt/M., Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Germany.

Martin Hutter (M)

Department of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt/M., Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Germany.

Udo Rolle (U)

Department of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt/M., Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH