Early fluid bolus in adults with sepsis in the emergency department: a systematic review, meta-analysis and narrative synthesis.


Journal

BMC emergency medicine
ISSN: 1471-227X
Titre abrégé: BMC Emerg Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968543

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 01 2022
Historique:
received: 22 09 2021
accepted: 02 12 2021
entrez: 12 1 2022
pubmed: 13 1 2022
medline: 19 4 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Early intravenous fluids for patients with sepsis presenting with hypoperfusion or shock in the emergency department remains one of the key recommendations of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines to reduce mortality. However, compliance with the recommendation remains poor. While several interventions have been implemented to improve early fluid administration as part of sepsis protocols, the extent to which they have improved compliance with fluid resuscitation is unknown. The factors associated with the lack of compliance are also poorly understood. We conducted a systematic review, meta-analysis and narrative review to investigate the effectiveness of interventions in emergency departments in improving compliance with early fluid administration and examine the non-interventional facilitators and barriers that may influence appropriate fluid administration in adults with sepsis. We searched MEDLINE Ovid/PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, CINAHL, and SCOPUS databases for studies of any design to April 2021. We synthesised results from the studies reporting effectiveness of interventions in a meta-analysis and conducted a narrative synthesis of studies reporting non-interventional factors. We included 31 studies out of the 825 unique articles identified in the systematic review of which 21 were included in the meta-analysis and 11 in the narrative synthesis. In meta-analysis, interventions were associated with a 47% improvement in the rate of compliance [(Random Effects (RE) Relative Risk (RR) = 1.47, 95% Confidence Interval (CI), 1.25-1.74, p-value < 0.01)]; an average 24 min reduction in the time to fluids [RE mean difference = - 24.11(95% CI - 14.09 to - 34.14 min, p value < 0.01)], and patients receiving an additional 575 mL fluids [RE mean difference = 575.40 (95% CI 202.28-1353.08, p value < 0.01)]. The compliance rate of early fluid administration reported in the studies included in the narrative synthesis is 48% [RR = 0.48 (95% CI 0.24-0.72)]. Performance improvement interventions improve compliance and time and volume of fluids administered to patients with sepsis in the emergency department. While patient-related factors such as advanced age, co-morbidities, cryptic shock were associated with poor compliance, important organisational factors such as inexperience of clinicians, overcrowding and inter-hospital transfers were also identified. A comprehensive understanding of the facilitators and barriers to early fluid administration is essential to design quality improvement projects. CRD42021225417.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Early intravenous fluids for patients with sepsis presenting with hypoperfusion or shock in the emergency department remains one of the key recommendations of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines to reduce mortality. However, compliance with the recommendation remains poor. While several interventions have been implemented to improve early fluid administration as part of sepsis protocols, the extent to which they have improved compliance with fluid resuscitation is unknown. The factors associated with the lack of compliance are also poorly understood.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review, meta-analysis and narrative review to investigate the effectiveness of interventions in emergency departments in improving compliance with early fluid administration and examine the non-interventional facilitators and barriers that may influence appropriate fluid administration in adults with sepsis. We searched MEDLINE Ovid/PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, CINAHL, and SCOPUS databases for studies of any design to April 2021. We synthesised results from the studies reporting effectiveness of interventions in a meta-analysis and conducted a narrative synthesis of studies reporting non-interventional factors.
RESULTS
We included 31 studies out of the 825 unique articles identified in the systematic review of which 21 were included in the meta-analysis and 11 in the narrative synthesis. In meta-analysis, interventions were associated with a 47% improvement in the rate of compliance [(Random Effects (RE) Relative Risk (RR) = 1.47, 95% Confidence Interval (CI), 1.25-1.74, p-value < 0.01)]; an average 24 min reduction in the time to fluids [RE mean difference = - 24.11(95% CI - 14.09 to - 34.14 min, p value < 0.01)], and patients receiving an additional 575 mL fluids [RE mean difference = 575.40 (95% CI 202.28-1353.08, p value < 0.01)]. The compliance rate of early fluid administration reported in the studies included in the narrative synthesis is 48% [RR = 0.48 (95% CI 0.24-0.72)].
CONCLUSION
Performance improvement interventions improve compliance and time and volume of fluids administered to patients with sepsis in the emergency department. While patient-related factors such as advanced age, co-morbidities, cryptic shock were associated with poor compliance, important organisational factors such as inexperience of clinicians, overcrowding and inter-hospital transfers were also identified. A comprehensive understanding of the facilitators and barriers to early fluid administration is essential to design quality improvement projects.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION ID
CRD42021225417.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35016638
doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00558-5
pii: 10.1186/s12873-021-00558-5
pmc: PMC8753824
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jan;34(1):1-9
pubmed: 26386734
BMC Emerg Med. 2017 Aug 30;17(1):27
pubmed: 28854874
Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 07;4:50
pubmed: 19664226
Crit Care. 2013 Oct 06;17(5):R224
pubmed: 24093643
BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2535
pubmed: 19622551
Intensive Care Med. 2017 May;43(5):625-632
pubmed: 28130687
J Telemed Telecare. 2018 Apr;24(3):202-208
pubmed: 29278979
Shock. 2012 May;37(5):463-7
pubmed: 22301605
N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 8;345(19):1368-77
pubmed: 11794169
Med J Aust. 2016 Feb 1;204(2):73
pubmed: 26821106
J Crit Care. 2019 Jun;51:94-98
pubmed: 30784983
J Crit Care. 2017 Apr;38:35-40
pubmed: 27837690
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2017 Aug;41:90-97
pubmed: 28363592
Res Synth Methods. 2020 Sep;11(5):641-654
pubmed: 32562361
Ann Pharmacother. 2018 Mar;52(3):240-245
pubmed: 29078714
J Intensive Care Med. 2018 Feb;33(2):111-115
pubmed: 27619691
J Emerg Nurs. 2018 Nov;44(6):552-562
pubmed: 29779625
Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Dec 1;30(10):802-809
pubmed: 29931166
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10
pubmed: 26903338
Evid Based Ment Health. 2019 Nov;22(4):153-160
pubmed: 31563865
Chest. 2018 Jan;153(1):39-45
pubmed: 28987477
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Jun;27(6):1785-1805
pubmed: 27683581
JAMA. 2014 Apr 2;311(13):1308-16
pubmed: 24638143
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Dec;6(12):1039-1053
pubmed: 31777340
Am J Med Qual. 2017 Sep/Oct;32(5):500-507
pubmed: 27837163
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 3;377(5):414-417
pubmed: 28658587
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Sep 19;25(1):96
pubmed: 28927439
J Emerg Nurs. 2020 Jan;46(1):91-98
pubmed: 31563282
PLoS One. 2015 May 06;10(5):e0125827
pubmed: 25946168
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Dec 19;14:135
pubmed: 25524443
Crit Care. 2020 Apr 7;24(1):137
pubmed: 32264936
JAMA. 2017 Oct 3;318(13):1233-1240
pubmed: 28973227
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Jul;35(7):953-960
pubmed: 28233644
J Emerg Med. 2013 Mar;44(3):698-708
pubmed: 23137959
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2020 Sep;49(9):661-668
pubmed: 33241254
J Crit Care. 2013 Apr;28(2):148-51
pubmed: 23102528
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 May;102(5):817-841
pubmed: 30612829
Int Emerg Nurs. 2008 Oct;16(4):250-6
pubmed: 18929343
BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34
pubmed: 9310563
Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Sep;68(3):298-311
pubmed: 27085369
Shock. 2012 Nov;38(5):474-9
pubmed: 23042195
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-1247
pubmed: 34599691
Emerg Med J. 2017 Sep;34(9):578-585
pubmed: 28515132
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Apr;37(4):762-763
pubmed: 30209007
Lung. 2011 Feb;189(1):11-9
pubmed: 21080182
Emerg Med J. 2013 May;30(5):397-401
pubmed: 22753641
Int J Clin Pract. 2012 Jul;66(7):705-10
pubmed: 22698423
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Mar;43(3):304-377
pubmed: 28101605
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 May;38(5):879-882
pubmed: 31301874
J Emerg Nurs. 2015 Mar;41(2):130-7
pubmed: 25612516
J Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;44(4):735-41
pubmed: 23332802
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Sep;32(9):1120-4
pubmed: 25082597
Crit Care Med. 2015 Dec;43(12):2589-96
pubmed: 26491865
BMC Emerg Med. 2017 Mar 23;17(1):11
pubmed: 28330460
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Oct 15;65(8):1253-1259
pubmed: 28605525
CJEM. 2017 Mar;19(2):112-121
pubmed: 27608524
Australas Emerg Care. 2021 Mar;24(1):67-72
pubmed: 32723674
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Feb;12(Suppl 1):S37-S47
pubmed: 32148924

Auteurs

Gladis Kabil (G)

Western Sydney University, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Locked bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia. g.kabil@westernsydney.edu.au.
Department of Emergency, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia. g.kabil@westernsydney.edu.au.

Steven A Frost (SA)

Western Sydney University, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Locked bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.
South Western Sydney Nursing and Midwifery Research, Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia.
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Deborah Hatcher (D)

Western Sydney University, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Locked bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.

Amith Shetty (A)

Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, Australia.
NSW Ministry of Health, New South Wales, Australia.

Jann Foster (J)

Western Sydney University, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Locked bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.

Stephen McNally (S)

Western Sydney University, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Locked bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH