Developing lactic acid bacteria starter cultures for wholemeal rye flour bread with improved functionality, nutritional value, taste, appearance and safety.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
10
08
2021
accepted:
09
12
2021
entrez:
14
1
2022
pubmed:
15
1
2022
medline:
11
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Starter cultures composed of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) were developed based on the genotypic and phenotypic characterisation of isolates belonging to dominant groups of bacteria in spontaneous rye wholemeal sourdoughs. Combinations of strains have been evaluated on an industrial scale in the sourdough fermentation process. Wholemeal rye bread was prepared using sourdoughs obtained with 3 new starter cultures, and compared to bread made using the commercial culture (LV2). All newly developed cultures used for the preparation of wholemeal rye bread allowed to obtain better quality products as compared to the LV2 based bread. The best results were obtained when the culture containing Lactiplantibacillus plantarum 2MI8 and exopolysaccharide (EPS)-producing Weissella confusa/cibaria 6PI3 strains was applied. The addition of yeast during sourdough breads production, especially the one prepared from mentioned above starter culture, significantly improved their organoleptic properties, their volume and crumb moisture was increased, and also the crumb acidity and hardness was reduced. Fermentation of rye wholemeal dough, especially without the yeast addition, resulted in a significant reduction in the content of higher inositol phosphates as compared to the applied flour, which is associated with improved bioavailability of minerals. The results of this study prove that the investigated new starter cultures can be successfully applied in wholemeal rye bread production.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35030182
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261677
pii: PONE-D-21-25957
pmc: PMC8759695
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0261677Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Food Microbiol. 2010 Dec;27(8):1000-8
pubmed: 20832677
Int J Food Microbiol. 2009 Aug 31;134(1-2):29-36
pubmed: 19515445
J Chromatogr A. 2003 Nov 7;1018(1):41-52
pubmed: 14582625
Int J Biol Macromol. 2018 Feb;107(Pt B):1765-1772
pubmed: 29030182
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Aug;69(8):4743-52
pubmed: 12902267
J Nutr. 1987 Dec;117(12):2061-5
pubmed: 2826727
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2014 Jul;13(4):473-492
pubmed: 33412702
Int J Food Microbiol. 2005 Aug 25;103(2):167-78
pubmed: 16083819
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Apr;41(4):1673-80
pubmed: 12682159
Food Chem. 2019 May 15;280:123-129
pubmed: 30642477
J Dairy Sci. 2005 Mar;88(3):843-56
pubmed: 15738217
Infect Immun. 2001 Jan;69(1):584-8
pubmed: 11119558
J Dairy Res. 2012 Feb;79(1):26-32
pubmed: 22008413
Molecules. 2020 Jun 07;25(11):
pubmed: 32517380
J Appl Microbiol. 2009 Nov;107(5):1528-35
pubmed: 19426261
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Feb;68(2):765-71
pubmed: 11823217
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Dec;79(24):7827-36
pubmed: 24096427
Biotechnol Adv. 2011 Jan-Feb;29(1):54-66
pubmed: 20807563
Front Microbiol. 2019 Jul 30;10:1733
pubmed: 31417524
Front Microbiol. 2015 Sep 11;6:834
pubmed: 26441845
Int J Food Microbiol. 2015 Mar 16;197:30-9
pubmed: 25555227
J Food Sci Technol. 2015 Feb;52(2):676-84
pubmed: 25694676
Food Microbiol. 2014 Feb;37:11-29
pubmed: 24230469
Food Microbiol. 2007 Apr;24(2):165-74
pubmed: 17008161
Nutrients. 2020 Apr 17;12(4):
pubmed: 32316499
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2021 Aug;13(4):915-925
pubmed: 33565028
Microbiologyopen. 2020 Apr;9(4):e1009
pubmed: 32045510
Int J Food Microbiol. 2012 May 15;156(2):122-6
pubmed: 22483399
Food Microbiol. 2015 Oct;51:57-68
pubmed: 26187828
Food Microbiol. 2014 Feb;37:30-40
pubmed: 24230470
Food Chem. 2021 Nov 15;362:130221
pubmed: 34098436
Appl Microbiol. 1971 Mar;21(3):459-65
pubmed: 5553285