Observational study of changes in utilization and outcomes in mechanical ventilation in COVID-19.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
COVID-19
/ epidemiology
Female
Hospital Mortality
Humans
Intubation, Intratracheal
/ statistics & numerical data
Length of Stay
Male
Middle Aged
Noninvasive Ventilation
/ statistics & numerical data
Respiration, Artificial
/ statistics & numerical data
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
23
07
2021
accepted:
21
12
2021
entrez:
14
1
2022
pubmed:
15
1
2022
medline:
27
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The role of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in severe COVID-19 remains a matter of debate. Therefore, the utilization and outcome of NIV in COVID-19 in an unbiased cohort was determined. The aim was to provide a detailed account of hospitalized COVID-19 patients requiring non-invasive ventilation during their hospital stay. Furthermore, differences of patients treated with NIV between the first and second wave are explored. Confirmed COVID-19 cases of claims data of the Local Health Care Funds with non-invasive and/or invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) in the spring and autumn pandemic period in 2020 were comparable analysed. Nationwide cohort of 17.023 cases (median/IQR age 71/61-80 years, 64% male) 7235 (42.5%) patients primarily received IMV without NIV, 4469 (26.3%) patients received NIV without subsequent intubation, and 3472 (20.4%) patients had NIV failure (NIV-F), defined by subsequent endotracheal intubation. The proportion of patients who received invasive MV decreased from 75% to 37% during the second period. Accordingly, the proportion of patients with NIV exclusively increased from 9% to 30%, and those failing NIV increased from 9% to 23%. Median length of hospital stay decreased from 26 to 21 days, and duration of MV decreased from 11.9 to 7.3 days. The NIV failure rate decreased from 49% to 43%. Overall mortality increased from 51% versus 54%. Mortality was 44% with NIV-only, 54% with IMV and 66% with NIV-F with mortality rates steadily increasing from 62% in early NIV-F (day 1) to 72% in late NIV-F (>4 days). Utilization of NIV rapidly increased during the autumn period, which was associated with a reduced duration of MV, but not with overall mortality. High NIV-F rates are associated with increased mortality, particularly in late NIV-F.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The role of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in severe COVID-19 remains a matter of debate. Therefore, the utilization and outcome of NIV in COVID-19 in an unbiased cohort was determined.
AIM
The aim was to provide a detailed account of hospitalized COVID-19 patients requiring non-invasive ventilation during their hospital stay. Furthermore, differences of patients treated with NIV between the first and second wave are explored.
METHODS
Confirmed COVID-19 cases of claims data of the Local Health Care Funds with non-invasive and/or invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) in the spring and autumn pandemic period in 2020 were comparable analysed.
RESULTS
Nationwide cohort of 17.023 cases (median/IQR age 71/61-80 years, 64% male) 7235 (42.5%) patients primarily received IMV without NIV, 4469 (26.3%) patients received NIV without subsequent intubation, and 3472 (20.4%) patients had NIV failure (NIV-F), defined by subsequent endotracheal intubation. The proportion of patients who received invasive MV decreased from 75% to 37% during the second period. Accordingly, the proportion of patients with NIV exclusively increased from 9% to 30%, and those failing NIV increased from 9% to 23%. Median length of hospital stay decreased from 26 to 21 days, and duration of MV decreased from 11.9 to 7.3 days. The NIV failure rate decreased from 49% to 43%. Overall mortality increased from 51% versus 54%. Mortality was 44% with NIV-only, 54% with IMV and 66% with NIV-F with mortality rates steadily increasing from 62% in early NIV-F (day 1) to 72% in late NIV-F (>4 days).
CONCLUSIONS
Utilization of NIV rapidly increased during the autumn period, which was associated with a reduced duration of MV, but not with overall mortality. High NIV-F rates are associated with increased mortality, particularly in late NIV-F.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35030205
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262315
pii: PONE-D-21-23922
pmc: PMC8759661
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0262315Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Dr. Karagiannidis reports personal fees from Maquet, personal fees from Xenios, personal fees from Bayer, non-financial support from Speaker of the German register of ICUs, grants from German Ministry of Research and Education, during the conduct of the study. Dr. Hentschker has nothing to disclose. Dr. Westhoff has nothing to disclose. Dr. Weber-Carstens has nothing to disclose. Dr. Janssens has nothing to disclose. Dr. Kluge reports non-financial support from Ambu, ETView Ltd, Fisher & Paykel and Xenios., grants from Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, personal fees from Astra, C.R. Bard, Baxter, Biotest, Cytosorbents, Fresenius, Gilead, MSD, Pfizer, Philips, ZOLL, personal fees and other from Bayer, Fresenius, Gilead, MSD und Pfizer, outside the submitted work. MP reports no conflicts of interests in regard to the manuscript, lecture fees from Boehringer, Novartis, Astra_Zeneca, Roche and fees for advisory board meetings from Boehringer, Novartis, Roche Current president of the German Society of Pneumology. Dr. Spies reports grants from Public Grants, grants from IIT grants from companies, other from Meeting support from companies (e.g. for the Leopoldina 2020 meeting), outside the submitted work; In addition, Dr. Spies has a patent EEG monitoring licensed, and a patent Ceilings licensed. Dr. Welte reports grants from German Minstry of Research and Education, during the conduct of the study. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 25;384(8):693-704
pubmed: 32678530
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 Jan 11;118(Forthcoming):
pubmed: 33531113
JAMA. 2020 Apr 28;323(16):1574-1581
pubmed: 32250385
Crit Care Med. 2021 Mar 1;49(3):e219-e234
pubmed: 33555780
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Aug;8(8):816-821
pubmed: 32645311
Respiration. 2020;99(6):521-542
pubmed: 32564028
JAMA. 2000 Nov 8;284(18):2361-7
pubmed: 11066187
JAMA. 2020 Oct 6;324(13):1317-1329
pubmed: 32876697
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020 Aug 3;117(31-32):528-533
pubmed: 32900426
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020 Sep;34(9):2341-2345
pubmed: 32425461
Minerva Anestesiol. 2020 Nov;86(11):1190-1204
pubmed: 32756535
Chest. 2020 Nov;158(5):1992-2002
pubmed: 32681847
Lancet. 2020 Jun 6;395(10239):1763-1770
pubmed: 32442528
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Sep 1;202(5):769-770
pubmed: 32492352
Eur Respir J. 2020 Nov 5;56(5):
pubmed: 32747398
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 May;9(5):e47-e48
pubmed: 33684356
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Oct 15;204(8):991-994
pubmed: 34283685
JAMA. 2020 Jun 9;323(22):2338-2340
pubmed: 32412606
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 May;106:254-261
pubmed: 33798720
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Aug;8(8):765-774
pubmed: 32569585
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Oct;125(4):e368-e371
pubmed: 32811662
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 Jun;18(6):1020-1026
pubmed: 33395553
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Jan;47(1):60-73
pubmed: 33211135
Eur Respir J. 2020 Oct 15;56(4):
pubmed: 32747395
Thorax. 2020 Nov;75(11):998-1000
pubmed: 32703883
Eur Respir J. 2010 Aug;36(2):362-9
pubmed: 20075052
Eur Respir J. 2020 Aug 13;56(2):
pubmed: 32430410
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Feb 15;195(4):438-442
pubmed: 27626833
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Aug 15;202(4):558-567
pubmed: 32325004
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Jun 1;201(11):1430-1434
pubmed: 32267160
BMJ. 2020 May 22;369:m1985
pubmed: 32444460
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020 Nov 18;13:1635-1648
pubmed: 33239884
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Sep;8(9):853-862
pubmed: 32735842
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Nov;46(11):2026-2034
pubmed: 32886208