Myofibril orientation as a metric for characterizing heart disease.


Journal

Biophysical journal
ISSN: 1542-0086
Titre abrégé: Biophys J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370626

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 02 2022
Historique:
received: 01 10 2021
revised: 28 12 2021
accepted: 11 01 2022
pubmed: 16 1 2022
medline: 15 4 2022
entrez: 15 1 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Myocyte disarray is a hallmark of many cardiac disorders. However, the relationship between alterations in the orientation of individual myofibrils and myofilaments to disease progression has been largely underexplored. This oversight has predominantly been because of a paucity of methods for objective and quantitative analysis. Here, we introduce a novel, less-biased approach to quantify myofibrillar and myofilament orientation in cardiac muscle under near-physiological conditions and demonstrate its superiority as compared with conventional histological assessments. Using small-angle x-ray diffraction, we first investigated changes in myofibrillar orientation at increasing sarcomere lengths in permeabilized, relaxed, wild-type mouse myocardium from the left ventricle by assessing the angular spread of the 1,0 equatorial reflection (angle σ). At a sarcomere length of 1.9 μm, the angle σ was 0.23 ± 0.01 rad, decreased to 0.19 ± 0.01 rad at a sarcomere length of 2.1 μm, and further decreased to 0.15 ± 0.01 rad at a sarcomere length of 2.3 μm (p < 0.0001). Angle σ was significantly larger in R403Q, a MYH7 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy model, porcine myocardium (0.24 ± 0.01 rad) compared with wild-type myocardium (0.14 ± 0.005 rad; p < 0.0001), as well as in human heart failure tissue (0.19 ± 0.006 rad) when compared with nonfailing samples (0.17 ± 0.007 rad; p = 0.01). These data indicate that diseased myocardium suffers from greater myofibrillar disorientation compared with healthy controls. Finally, we showed that conventional, histology-based analysis of disarray can be subject to user bias and/or sampling error and lead to false positives. Our method for directly assessing myofibrillar orientation avoids the artifacts introduced by conventional histological approaches that assess myocyte orientation and only indirectly evaluate myofibrillar orientation, and provides a precise and objective metric for phenotypically characterizing myocardium. The ability to obtain excellent x-ray diffraction patterns from frozen human myocardium provides a new tool for investigating structural anomalies associated with cardiac diseases.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35032456
pii: S0006-3495(22)00038-8
doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2022.01.009
pmc: PMC8874025
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

565-574

Subventions

Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : T32 GM136577
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : P41 GM103622
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : T32 HL007227
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL139883
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL128683
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : P30 GM138395
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Références

Circulation. 2021 Mar 2;143(9):965-967
pubmed: 33370156
Sci Transl Med. 2015 Dec 23;7(319):319ra207
pubmed: 26702095
Exp Cell Res. 2004 Nov 15;301(1):1-7
pubmed: 15501438
JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2020 Jul 22;5(8):786-798
pubmed: 32875169
Cell. 1990 Sep 7;62(5):999-1006
pubmed: 1975517
Front Physiol. 2020 Feb 13;11:92
pubmed: 32116796
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Feb 23;113(8):2306-11
pubmed: 26858417
Circ Res. 2013 Jan 4;112(1):209-21
pubmed: 23287456
Biophys J. 1995 Mar;68(3):1027-44
pubmed: 7756523
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Aug 28;115(35):E8143-E8152
pubmed: 30104387
Nat Commun. 2020 May 15;11(1):2417
pubmed: 32415060
J Synchrotron Radiat. 2004 Sep 1;11(Pt 5):399-405
pubmed: 15310956
Circ Res. 2017 Sep 15;121(7):749-770
pubmed: 28912181
J Cell Biol. 1992 Sep;118(6):1411-20
pubmed: 1522115
Histopathology. 1995 Jun;26(6):493-500
pubmed: 7665141
JAMA. 2020 Aug 04;324(5):488-504
pubmed: 32749493
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 19;10(1):20169
pubmed: 33214588
J Physiol. 2020 Nov;598(22):5165-5182
pubmed: 32818298
Circulation. 2013 Jul 23;128(4):388-400
pubmed: 23877061
Connect Tissue Res. 2003;44(5):201-7
pubmed: 14660090
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2019 Oct;9(Suppl 2):S388-S415
pubmed: 31737545
Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1980;9:81-105
pubmed: 6994598
J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2016 Oct;99:218-229
pubmed: 26529187
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jan 5;107(1):430-5
pubmed: 19966283
Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2003 Apr;31(2):73-8
pubmed: 12715970
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2019 Dec;21(Suppl M):M40-M43
pubmed: 31908615
Exp Cell Res. 2007 Jun 10;313(10):2063-76
pubmed: 17509566
J Gen Physiol. 2019 May 6;151(5):610-613
pubmed: 30792184
Pflugers Arch. 2019 May;471(5):701-717
pubmed: 30767072
Science. 2016 Feb 5;351(6273):617-21
pubmed: 26912705
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Sep 06;19(9):
pubmed: 30200618
J Exp Biol. 1998 Jan;201(Pt 1):135-42
pubmed: 9390944
J Mol Biol. 1973 Jul 15;77(4):549-68
pubmed: 4541885
Biophys J. 1985 Mar;47(3):311-21
pubmed: 3872138
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 4;117(31):18822-18831
pubmed: 32690703
J Gen Physiol. 2019 Jan 7;151(1):53-65
pubmed: 30510036
J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2018 Oct;123:26-37
pubmed: 30138628
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2018 May-Aug;22(2):279
pubmed: 30158787
Heart. 2007 Sep;93(9):1137-46
pubmed: 17699180
Pflugers Arch. 2005 Feb;449(5):449-57
pubmed: 15688246
Am J Cardiol. 2001 Aug 1;88(3):275-9
pubmed: 11472707
Nat Med. 2018 Aug;24(8):1225-1233
pubmed: 29892068
Circ Res. 2021 Sep 3;129(6):617-630
pubmed: 34365814
Cell. 1979 Dec;18(4):1053-63
pubmed: 391403
J Cell Biol. 1983 Feb;96(2):562-70
pubmed: 6682107
Circulation. 1979 Sep;60(3):685-96
pubmed: 572271
Sci Adv. 2017 Feb 10;3(2):e1601959
pubmed: 28246639
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Apr 7;117(14):8177-8186
pubmed: 32220962
Cardiovasc Res. 1998 Feb;37(2):367-80
pubmed: 9614494
Biophys J. 1985 Nov;48(5):829-34
pubmed: 4074840

Auteurs

Weikang Ma (W)

BioCAT, Department of Biology, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: wma6@iit.edu.

Henry Gong (H)

BioCAT, Department of Biology, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois.

Vivek Jani (V)

Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Kyoung Hwan Lee (KH)

Division of Cell Biology and Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.

Maicon Landim-Vieira (M)

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida.

Maria Papadaki (M)

Department of Cell and Molecular Physiology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

Jose R Pinto (JR)

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida.

M Imran Aslam (MI)

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Anthony Cammarato (A)

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Physiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Thomas Irving (T)

BioCAT, Department of Biology, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH