Distinct spatio-temporal and spectral brain patterns for different thermal stimuli perception.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 01 2022
18 01 2022
Historique:
received:
05
03
2021
accepted:
28
12
2021
entrez:
19
1
2022
pubmed:
20
1
2022
medline:
25
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Understanding the human brain's perception of different thermal sensations has sparked the interest of many neuroscientists. The identification of distinct brain patterns when processing thermal stimuli has several clinical applications, such as phantom-limb pain prediction, as well as increasing the sense of embodiment when interacting with neurorehabilitation devices. Notwithstanding the remarkable number of studies that have touched upon this research topic, understanding how the human brain processes different thermal stimuli has remained elusive. More importantly, very intense thermal stimuli perception dynamics, their related cortical activations, as well as their decoding using effective features are still not fully understood. In this study, using electroencephalography (EEG) recorded from three healthy human subjects, we identified spatial, temporal, and spectral patterns of brain responses to different thermal stimulations ranging from extremely cold and hot stimuli (very intense), moderately cold and hot stimuli (intense), to a warm stimulus (innocuous). Our results show that very intense thermal stimuli elicit a decrease in alpha power compared to intense and innocuous stimulations. Spatio-temporal analysis reveals that in the first 400 ms post-stimulus, brain activity increases in the prefrontal and central brain areas for very intense stimulations, whereas for intense stimulation, high activity of the parietal area was observed post-500 ms. Based on these identified EEG patterns, we successfully classified the different thermal stimulations with an average test accuracy of 84% across all subjects. En route to understanding the underlying cortical activity, we source localized the EEG signal for each of the five thermal stimuli conditions. Our findings reveal that very intense stimuli were anticipated and induced early activation (before 400 ms) of the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). Moreover, activation of the pre-frontal cortex, somatosensory, central, and parietal areas, was observed in the first 400 ms post-stimulation for very intense conditions and starting 500 ms post-stimuli for intense conditions. Overall, despite the small sample size, this work presents novel findings and a first comprehensive approach to explore, analyze, and classify EEG-brain activity changes evoked by five different thermal stimuli, which could lead to a better understanding of thermal stimuli processing in the brain and could, therefore, pave the way for developing a real-time withdrawal reaction system when interacting with prosthetic limbs. We underpin this last point by benchmarking our EEG results with a demonstration of a real-time withdrawal reaction of a robotic prosthesis using a human-like artificial skin.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35042875
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-04831-w
pii: 10.1038/s41598-022-04831-w
pmc: PMC8766611
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
919Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
PeerJ. 2020 Jan 7;8:e8330
pubmed: 31938578
J Physiol. 2001 May 1;532(Pt 3):823-33
pubmed: 11313449
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Jul 09;12:273
pubmed: 30038564
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994 Oct;57(10):1166-72
pubmed: 7931375
Sci Transl Med. 2017 May 3;9(388):
pubmed: 28469039
Nature. 1991 Jan 3;349(6304):61-4
pubmed: 1985266
Sci Robot. 2020 Dec 9;5(49):
pubmed: 33298517
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008 Aug;55(8):1991-2000
pubmed: 18632362
Physiol Rev. 2017 Apr;97(2):767-837
pubmed: 28275048
J Neurosci Methods. 2015 Mar 30;243:84-93
pubmed: 25666892
J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Jul;12(4):691-703
pubmed: 10936920
J Neurosci Methods. 2010 Sep 30;192(1):152-62
pubmed: 20654646
Somatosens Mot Res. 2018 Sep - Dec;35(3-4):192-198
pubmed: 30461318
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Aug;28(8):3691-3699
pubmed: 31811482
Neuroimage. 2014 Feb 1;86:446-60
pubmed: 24161808
Neuron. 2015 May 20;86(4):864-882
pubmed: 25996132
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Jul 24;19(8):
pubmed: 30042373
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 Mar-Apr;26(3):275-81
pubmed: 21730360
Nat Commun. 2019 Feb 14;10(1):753
pubmed: 30765707
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 27;10(1):5606
pubmed: 32221336
Exp Brain Res. 1987;68(3):516-24
pubmed: 3691723
J Neurosci. 2014 Aug 20;34(34):11439-51
pubmed: 25143623
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2018 Jul;2018:106-109
pubmed: 30440352
J Neural Eng. 2018 Dec;15(6):065003
pubmed: 30215610
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 May 9;5(5):172170
pubmed: 29892405
J Neurosci Methods. 2021 Jan 1;347:108964
pubmed: 33010301
Neuroimage. 2001 Dec;14(6):1302-8
pubmed: 11707086
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2020 Jul;2020:5061-5064
pubmed: 33019124
Learn Mem. 2016 Sep 15;23(10):544-55
pubmed: 27634145
Med Biol Eng Comput. 1994 Jan;32(1):43-8
pubmed: 8182961
Nat Commun. 2018 Oct 26;9(1):4487
pubmed: 30367033
Neuroimage. 1999 Feb;9(2):179-94
pubmed: 9931268
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Jan 08;19(1):
pubmed: 30626132
Eur J Neurosci. 1996 Jul;8(7):1461-73
pubmed: 8758953
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Sep 21;12:352
pubmed: 30319374
Mol Neurobiol. 2019 Feb;56(2):1137-1166
pubmed: 29876878
Neurosci Lett. 2000 Jul 14;288(2):159-62
pubmed: 10876085
Neuroimage Clin. 2014 Jun 16;5:77-83
pubmed: 25003030
Brain Res Bull. 2002 Mar 15;57(5):667-75
pubmed: 11927371
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 23;11(1):18917
pubmed: 34556692
Clin Neurophysiol. 1999 Nov;110(11):1842-57
pubmed: 10576479
J Neurophysiol. 2017 Feb 1;117(2):786-795
pubmed: 27903639
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991 Sep;79(3):192-203
pubmed: 1714810
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Feb 26;19(5):
pubmed: 30813520
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 Mar 27;15(1):28
pubmed: 29580245
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:813870
pubmed: 21253358
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 4;8(1):8541
pubmed: 29867147
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 17;9(1):19258
pubmed: 31848384
Cereb Cortex. 2015 Nov;25(11):4407-14
pubmed: 25754338
Nat Commun. 2017 Feb 14;8:14211
pubmed: 28195170
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Aug;37(8):2976-91
pubmed: 27167709
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Feb;21(2):100-110
pubmed: 28025007
Neuroimage. 2012 Jun;61(2):371-85
pubmed: 22227136
Pain. 2000 Apr;85(3):359-374
pubmed: 10781909
Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 07;6:24076
pubmed: 27052520
Brain. 1999 Sep;122 ( Pt 9):1765-80
pubmed: 10468515
J Neurosci. 2019 Dec 11;39(50):9878-9882
pubmed: 31676604
Nature. 1996 Nov 21;384(6606):258-60
pubmed: 8918874
Pain. 1997 Dec;73(3):431-445
pubmed: 9469535
Clin Neurophysiol. 2000 Dec;111(12):2130-7
pubmed: 11090762
Acta Oncol. 2016;55(4):430-6
pubmed: 26360921
J Neurosci Res. 2022 Jan;100(1):66-98
pubmed: 33314372
Brain Topogr. 1994 Winter;7(2):129-40
pubmed: 7696090
Neuron. 2002 Jan 31;33(3):341-55
pubmed: 11832223
Phys Med Biol. 2006 Mar 7;51(5):1333-46
pubmed: 16481698
J Neurosci. 2016 May 4;36(18):5013-25
pubmed: 27147654
Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Oct;115(10):2195-222
pubmed: 15351361
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 23;15(4):e0231698
pubmed: 32324752
Neuron. 2000 Apr;26(1):55-67
pubmed: 10798392
Int J Psychophysiol. 2017 Mar;113:17-22
pubmed: 28082129
Brain Topogr. 1990 Fall;3(1):137-41
pubmed: 2094301
Neuroimage. 2002 Feb;15(2):293-301
pubmed: 11798266
Ann Surg. 1985 Jun;201(6):785-92
pubmed: 3923954
Front Neurosci. 2013 Dec 26;7:267
pubmed: 24431986