Alleviation of temperature stress in maize by integration of foliar applied growth promoting substances and sowing dates.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
21
10
2021
accepted:
22
11
2021
entrez:
20
1
2022
pubmed:
21
1
2022
medline:
11
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Temperature is a key factor influencing plant growth and productivity, but its sudden rise can cause severe consequences on crop performances. Early sowing and application of growth promoting agents as a foliar spray can be a sustainable approach to cope with high temperature stress at grain filling stage of cereal crops. Therefore, a test was designed to explore the potential of different growth helping agents including sorghum water extract (SWE, 10 ml L-1), moringa leaf extract (MLE, 3%), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, 2 μM), salicylic acid (SA, 50 mg L-1) and ascorbic acid (ASA, 50 mg L-1) as foliar agents at different sowing dates (early and optimum) to cope with temperature stress in maize. The results stated that foliar application of growth promoting substances successfully persuaded high temperature tolerance at reproductive phase of maize in early and optimum sowings when compared to control. However, SWE + ASA, MLE + H2O2 and SWE + ASA + SA + H2O2 were the best combinations for improving growth, development, and physiological variables under both sowing dates even under suboptimal temperature. All foliar applications significantly increased maize grain and biological yields while maximum was observed in SWE + ASA followed by SWE + ASA + SA + H2O2 or MLE + H2O2 that were statistically at par with ASA + SA + H2O2 but plants without spray or distilled water application did not improve grain and biological yields. Overall, the foliar applications of growth promoting substances enable the plant to enhance its growth, development, morphology, yield and biochemical variables.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35051214
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260916
pii: PONE-D-21-33703
pmc: PMC8775190
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Retracted Publication
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0260916Commentaires et corrections
Type : RetractionIn
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2021 May;162:410-420
pubmed: 33740680
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 23;8(1):15665
pubmed: 30353095
Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248-54
pubmed: 942051
New Phytol. 2017 Aug;215(3):1210-1220
pubmed: 28585243
Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2018 Jul;24(4):577-589
pubmed: 30042614
J Agric Food Chem. 2003 Apr 9;51(8):2144-55
pubmed: 12670148
Plant Physiol. 2001 Jul;126(3):1024-30
pubmed: 11457953
Acta Biochim Pol. 2007;54(1):39-50
pubmed: 17325747
J Exp Bot. 2003 May;54(386):1415-20
pubmed: 12709488
J Plant Physiol. 2003 May;160(5):485-92
pubmed: 12806776
Plants (Basel). 2019 Jan 30;8(2):
pubmed: 30704089
J Plant Res. 2007 Mar;120(2):219-28
pubmed: 17024517
Plant J. 2004 May;38(3):432-47
pubmed: 15086804
J Plant Physiol. 2007 Jun;164(6):728-36
pubmed: 16690163
Animal. 2007 Oct;1(9):1371-91
pubmed: 22444893
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Nov 20;115(47):E11188-E11197
pubmed: 30413622
J Exp Bot. 2006;57(8):1657-65
pubmed: 16698812
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Feb;20(2):408-17
pubmed: 24038930
Plant Physiol. 1990 Mar;92(3):648-53
pubmed: 16667329
J Plant Physiol. 2006 May;163(7):723-30
pubmed: 16616583
Plant Physiol. 1994 Sep;106(1):45-51
pubmed: 12232301
Pak J Biol Sci. 2009 Apr 1;12(7):582-8
pubmed: 19580015
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1993 Aug;51(2):241-6
pubmed: 8353387