How to Distinguish Marfan Syndrome from Marfanoid Habitus in a Physical Examination-Comparison of External Features in Patients with Marfan Syndrome and Marfanoid Habitus.
Ghent criteria
Marfan syndrome
aortic root dilatation
gothic palate
marfanoid habitus
pectus carinatum
pectus excavatum
thumb sign
wrist sign
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 01 2022
11 01 2022
Historique:
received:
07
11
2021
revised:
02
01
2022
accepted:
04
01
2022
entrez:
21
1
2022
pubmed:
22
1
2022
medline:
1
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Marfan Syndrome (MFS) is a systemic disorder caused by mutations in fibrillin-1. The most common cause of mortality in MFS is dissection and rupture of the aorta. Due to a highly variable and age-dependent clinical spectrum, the diagnosis of MFS still remains sophisticated. The aim of the study was to determine if there exist phenotypic features that can play the role of "red flags" in cases of MFS suspicion. The study population included 306 patients (199 children and 107 adults) who were referred to the Department of Pediatric Cardiology due to suspicion of MFS. All patients underwent complete clinical evaluation in order to confirm the diagnosis of MFS according to the modified Ghent criteria. MFS was diagnosed in 109 patients and marfanoid habitus in 168 patients. The study excluded 29 patients with other hereditary thoracic aneurysm syndromes. Comparative analysis between patients with Marfan syndrome and marfanoid habitus was performed. Symptoms with high prevalence and high positive likelihood ratio were identified (pectus carinatum, reduced elbow extension, hindfoot deformity, gothic palate, downslanting palpebral fissures, lens subluxation, myopia ≥ 3 dioptres remarkably high stature). The differentiation between patients with MFS and marfanoid body habitus is not possible by only assessing external body features; however, "red flags" could be helpful in the screening phase.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35055593
pii: ijerph19020772
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020772
pmc: PMC8775541
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2017 Jun;10(3):
pubmed: 28600386
Genet Med. 2014 Mar;16(3):246-50
pubmed: 24008997
N Engl J Med. 1972 Apr 13;286(15):804-8
pubmed: 5011789
J Med Genet. 2010 Jul;47(7):476-85
pubmed: 20591885
Int J Psychiatry Med. 2015;50(4):347-60
pubmed: 26526396
J Child Orthop. 2010 Dec;4(6):545-51
pubmed: 22132032
Pediatrics. 2009 Jan;123(1):391-8
pubmed: 19117906
J Pediatr. 2019 Jan;204:250-255.e1
pubmed: 30270167
Lancet. 2020 Dec 21;394(10216):2263-2270
pubmed: 31836196
Am J Med Genet A. 2008 Dec 15;146A(24):3157-66
pubmed: 19012347
Lancet. 1998 Nov 28;352(9142):1722-3
pubmed: 9848345
Psychiatr Pol. 2021 Aug 31;55(4):815-834
pubmed: 34994739
J Pediatr. 2020 Jun;221:188-195.e1
pubmed: 32446479
Diseases. 2015 Mar 12;3(1):24-33
pubmed: 28943606
Lancet. 2005 Dec 3;366(9501):1965-76
pubmed: 16325700
Eur Heart J. 2014 Nov 1;35(41):2873-926
pubmed: 25173340
Pediatr Cardiol. 2019 Feb;40(2):393-403
pubmed: 30417312
Acta Paediatr. 2013 Feb;102(2):e84-9
pubmed: 23110520