Vectorized Treg-depleting αCTLA-4 elicits antigen cross-presentation and CD8
CTLA-4 antigen
antibody specificity
immunotherapy
oncolytic virotherapy
Journal
Journal for immunotherapy of cancer
ISSN: 2051-1426
Titre abrégé: J Immunother Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101620585
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2022
01 2022
Historique:
accepted:
27
12
2021
entrez:
21
1
2022
pubmed:
22
1
2022
medline:
17
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is a clinically proven concept to treat cancer. Still, a majority of patients with cancer including those with poorly immune infiltrated 'cold' tumors are resistant to currently available ICB therapies. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) is one of few clinically validated targets for ICB, but toxicities linked to efficacy in approved αCTLA-4 regimens have restricted their use and precluded full therapeutic dosing. At a mechanistic level, accumulating preclinical and clinical data indicate dual mechanisms for αCTLA-4; ICB and regulatory T cell (Treg) depletion are both thought to contribute efficacy and toxicity in available, systemic, αCTLA-4 regimens. Accordingly, strategies to deliver highly effective, yet safe αCTLA-4 therapies have been lacking. Here we assess and identify spatially restricted exposure to a novel strongly Treg-depleting, checkpoint-blocking, vectorized αCTLA-4, as a highly efficacious and potentially safe strategy to target CTLA-4. A novel human IgG1 CTLA-4 antibody (4-E03) was identified using function-first screening for monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and targets associated with superior Treg-depleting activity. A tumor-selective oncolytic vaccinia vector was then engineered to encode this novel, strongly Treg-depleting, checkpoint-blocking, αCTLA-4 antibody or a matching surrogate antibody, and Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (VV The identified 4-E03 antibody showed significantly stronger Treg depletion, but equipotent checkpoint blockade, compared with clinically validated αCTLA-4 ipilimumab against CTLA-4-expressing Treg cells in a humanized mouse model in vivo. Intratumoral administration of VV Our findings demonstrate in vivo proof of concept for spatial restriction of Treg depletion-optimized immune checkpoint blocking, vectorized αCTLA-4 as a highly effective and safe strategy to target CTLA-4. A clinical trial evaluating intratumoral VV
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is a clinically proven concept to treat cancer. Still, a majority of patients with cancer including those with poorly immune infiltrated 'cold' tumors are resistant to currently available ICB therapies. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) is one of few clinically validated targets for ICB, but toxicities linked to efficacy in approved αCTLA-4 regimens have restricted their use and precluded full therapeutic dosing. At a mechanistic level, accumulating preclinical and clinical data indicate dual mechanisms for αCTLA-4; ICB and regulatory T cell (Treg) depletion are both thought to contribute efficacy and toxicity in available, systemic, αCTLA-4 regimens. Accordingly, strategies to deliver highly effective, yet safe αCTLA-4 therapies have been lacking. Here we assess and identify spatially restricted exposure to a novel strongly Treg-depleting, checkpoint-blocking, vectorized αCTLA-4, as a highly efficacious and potentially safe strategy to target CTLA-4.
METHODS
A novel human IgG1 CTLA-4 antibody (4-E03) was identified using function-first screening for monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and targets associated with superior Treg-depleting activity. A tumor-selective oncolytic vaccinia vector was then engineered to encode this novel, strongly Treg-depleting, checkpoint-blocking, αCTLA-4 antibody or a matching surrogate antibody, and Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (VV
RESULTS
The identified 4-E03 antibody showed significantly stronger Treg depletion, but equipotent checkpoint blockade, compared with clinically validated αCTLA-4 ipilimumab against CTLA-4-expressing Treg cells in a humanized mouse model in vivo. Intratumoral administration of VV
CONCLUSION
Our findings demonstrate in vivo proof of concept for spatial restriction of Treg depletion-optimized immune checkpoint blocking, vectorized αCTLA-4 as a highly effective and safe strategy to target CTLA-4. A clinical trial evaluating intratumoral VV
Identifiants
pubmed: 35058324
pii: jitc-2021-003488
doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-003488
pmc: PMC8783833
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
CTLA-4 Antigen
0
Ctla4 protein, mouse
0
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: MS, MR, PH, LM, CS, FJ, MB, IT, and BF are employees, MS, MR, LM, FJ, MB, IT, and BF are shareholders of BioInvent International. KLC received funding from BioInvent. J-BM, LF, CR, NS, PK, JD, JF, and EQ are employees and shareholders of Transgene.
Références
Immunity. 1995 Nov;3(5):541-7
pubmed: 7584144
N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 19;363(8):711-23
pubmed: 20525992
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Dec 10;23(35):8968-77
pubmed: 16204013
Nat Cancer. 2020 Dec;1(12):1153-1166
pubmed: 33644766
J Clin Invest. 2013 Jun;123(6):2447-63
pubmed: 23728179
Immunol Rev. 1996 Oct;153:27-46
pubmed: 9010718
Nat Immunol. 2007 Feb;8(2):191-7
pubmed: 17136045
Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Oct 1;19(19):5261-3
pubmed: 23965900
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019 Mar;18(3):197-218
pubmed: 30610226
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 2;373(1):23-34
pubmed: 26027431
Cell. 2017 Sep 7;170(6):1109-1119.e10
pubmed: 28886381
Nat Rev Immunol. 2018 Aug;18(8):498-513
pubmed: 29743717
Cell. 2017 Feb 9;168(4):707-723
pubmed: 28187290
J Immunother Cancer. 2020 Nov;8(2):
pubmed: 33188038
Nature. 2014 Nov 27;515(7528):577-81
pubmed: 25428507
Cancer Res. 2017 Aug 1;77(15):4146-4157
pubmed: 28536278
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Sep 1;33(25):2780-8
pubmed: 26014293
Mol Ther Oncolytics. 2019 Mar 27;14:1-14
pubmed: 31011628
Nature. 2021 Mar;591(7851):652-658
pubmed: 33588426
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 May 31;113(22):6248-53
pubmed: 27185917
Nat Rev Cancer. 2018 May;18(5):313-322
pubmed: 29449659
Cancer Cell. 2018 Apr 9;33(4):649-663.e4
pubmed: 29576375
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 28;366(26):2443-54
pubmed: 22658127
Science. 1995 Nov 10;270(5238):985-8
pubmed: 7481803
Nat Immunol. 2020 Dec;21(12):1552-1562
pubmed: 33046887
Cancer Discov. 2018 Sep;8(9):1069-1086
pubmed: 30115704
Science. 2017 Mar 31;355(6332):1428-1433
pubmed: 28280247
Nat Commun. 2017 Mar 27;8:14754
pubmed: 28345650
Immunity. 2018 Nov 20;49(5):958-970.e7
pubmed: 30446386
Cell. 2015 May 21;161(5):1035-1045
pubmed: 25976835
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun 10;36(17):1658-1667
pubmed: 28981385
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Apr 10;115(15):3912-3917
pubmed: 29581255
Science. 2008 Nov 14;322(5904):1097-100
pubmed: 19008445
BMC Med. 2015 Sep 04;13:211
pubmed: 26337719
Oncoimmunology. 2016 Sep 9;5(10):e1220467
pubmed: 27853644
N Engl J Med. 2015 May 21;372(21):2006-17
pubmed: 25891304
J Exp Med. 2013 Aug 26;210(9):1695-710
pubmed: 23897981
Immunity. 2013 Jul 25;39(1):1-10
pubmed: 23890059
J Exp Med. 2009 Aug 3;206(8):1717-25
pubmed: 19581407
Immunity. 2016 Apr 19;44(4):924-38
pubmed: 27096321
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Nov 5;116(45):22699-22709
pubmed: 31636208
Cancer Cell. 2013 Apr 15;23(4):502-15
pubmed: 23597564
Mol Ther. 2020 Nov 4;28(11):2320-2339
pubmed: 32979309
Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Oct 1;19(19):5381-9
pubmed: 23788581
Nat Immunol. 2013 Oct;14(10):1014-22
pubmed: 24048123
Cancer Immun. 2013;13:5
pubmed: 23390376
Immunity. 2019 Apr 16;50(4):1084-1098.e10
pubmed: 30926234
Immunity. 2018 Dec 18;49(6):1148-1161.e7
pubmed: 30552023
Science. 1996 Mar 22;271(5256):1734-6
pubmed: 8596936