Recidivism and mortality after in-jail buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder.

Buprenorphine Criminal justice settings Massachusetts Justice Community Opioid Innovation Network (MassJCOIN) Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) Mortality Naltrexone Recidivism

Journal

Drug and alcohol dependence
ISSN: 1879-0046
Titre abrégé: Drug Alcohol Depend
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 7513587

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 02 2022
Historique:
received: 20 09 2021
revised: 05 12 2021
accepted: 06 12 2021
pubmed: 23 1 2022
medline: 11 3 2022
entrez: 22 1 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Buprenorphine is an effective medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) when offered in community-based settings, but evidence is limited for incarcerated populations, particularly in relation to recidivism. In Massachusetts, Franklin County jail (FCSO) was among the first to provide buprenorphine; adjacent Hampshire County jail (HCHC) offered it more recently. These jails present a natural experiment to determine whether outcomes are different between individuals who did and did not have the opportunity to receive buprenorphine in jail. We examined outcomes of all incarcerated adults with opioid use disorder (n = 469) who did (FCSO n = 197) and did not (HCHC n = 272) have the opportunity to receive buprenorphine. The primary outcome was post-release recidivism, defined as time from jail exit to a recidivism event (incarceration, probation violation, arraignment). Using Cox proportional hazards models, we investigated site as a predictor, controlling for covariates. We also examined post-release deaths. Fewer FCSO than HCHC individuals recidivated (48.2% vs. 62.5%; p = 0.001); fewer FCSO individuals were re-arraigned (36.0% vs. 47.1%; p = 0.046) or re-incarcerated (21.3% vs. 39.0%; p < 0.0001). Recidivism risk was lower in the FCSO group (hazard ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.56, 0.89; p = 0.003), net of covariates (adjusted hazard ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.53, 0.86; p = 0.001). At each site, 3% of participants died. Among incarcerated adults with opioid use disorder, risk of recidivism after jail exit is lower among those who were offered buprenorphine during incarceration. Findings support the growing movement in jails nationwide to offer buprenorphine and other agonist medications for opioid use disorder.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Buprenorphine is an effective medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) when offered in community-based settings, but evidence is limited for incarcerated populations, particularly in relation to recidivism. In Massachusetts, Franklin County jail (FCSO) was among the first to provide buprenorphine; adjacent Hampshire County jail (HCHC) offered it more recently. These jails present a natural experiment to determine whether outcomes are different between individuals who did and did not have the opportunity to receive buprenorphine in jail.
METHODS
We examined outcomes of all incarcerated adults with opioid use disorder (n = 469) who did (FCSO n = 197) and did not (HCHC n = 272) have the opportunity to receive buprenorphine. The primary outcome was post-release recidivism, defined as time from jail exit to a recidivism event (incarceration, probation violation, arraignment). Using Cox proportional hazards models, we investigated site as a predictor, controlling for covariates. We also examined post-release deaths.
RESULTS
Fewer FCSO than HCHC individuals recidivated (48.2% vs. 62.5%; p = 0.001); fewer FCSO individuals were re-arraigned (36.0% vs. 47.1%; p = 0.046) or re-incarcerated (21.3% vs. 39.0%; p < 0.0001). Recidivism risk was lower in the FCSO group (hazard ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.56, 0.89; p = 0.003), net of covariates (adjusted hazard ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.53, 0.86; p = 0.001). At each site, 3% of participants died.
CONCLUSIONS
Among incarcerated adults with opioid use disorder, risk of recidivism after jail exit is lower among those who were offered buprenorphine during incarceration. Findings support the growing movement in jails nationwide to offer buprenorphine and other agonist medications for opioid use disorder.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35063323
pii: S0376-8716(21)00749-3
doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109254
pmc: PMC8852331
mid: NIHMS1768879
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Analgesics, Opioid 0
Buprenorphine 40D3SCR4GZ

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

109254

Subventions

Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : UG1 DA050067
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : UG3 DA044830
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : UH3 DA044830
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Published by Elsevier B.V.

Références

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Aug 1;189:108-115
pubmed: 29908410
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 May;124:108216
pubmed: 33288348
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Mar 1;208:107858
pubmed: 32050112
Addiction. 2019 Aug;114(8):1396-1404
pubmed: 30916463
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018 May 1;78(1):43-53
pubmed: 29373393
Eur Addict Res. 2014;20(4):192-9
pubmed: 24513717
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 Sep;128:108275
pubmed: 33483222
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2019 Feb;16(1):1-6
pubmed: 30684117
Addiction. 2017 May;112(5):838-851
pubmed: 27981691
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009 Jan 1;99(1-3):222-30
pubmed: 18930603
J Addict Dis. 2015;34(2-3):220-5
pubmed: 26076211
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Nov 5;159(9):592-600
pubmed: 24189594
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr;37(2):252-71
pubmed: 18679805
PLoS Med. 2019 Dec 31;16(12):e1003002
pubmed: 31891578
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Oct 1;227:108937
pubmed: 34371235
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 02;(6):CD010862
pubmed: 26035084
Addiction. 2017 Aug;112(8):1440-1450
pubmed: 28239984
Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Jul;81:102768
pubmed: 32446130
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Mar 01;172:34-42
pubmed: 28107680
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019 Apr;99:32-43
pubmed: 30797392
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Mar 1;184:57-63
pubmed: 29402680
Am J Addict. 2012 Sep-Oct;21(5):476-87
pubmed: 22882399

Auteurs

Elizabeth A Evans (EA)

Department of Health Promotion and Policy, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 312 Arnold House, 715 North Pleasant Street, Amherst, MA 01003, USA. Electronic address: eaevans@umass.edu.

Donna Wilson (D)

University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (UMCMS) - Baystate and Baystate Health, Springfield, MA, USA. Electronic address: Donna.Wilson@baystatehealth.org.

Peter D Friedmann (PD)

University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (UMCMS) - Baystate and Baystate Health, Springfield, MA, USA. Electronic address: peter.friedmannmd@baystatehealth.org.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH