Developing a How-to-Guide for Health Technology Reassessment: "The HTR Playbook".
De-Implementation
Disinvestment
Health Services Misuse
Health Technology Reassessment
Low Value Care
Medical Overuse
Journal
International journal of health policy and management
ISSN: 2322-5939
Titre abrégé: Int J Health Policy Manag
Pays: Iran
ID NLM: 101619905
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 12 2022
06 12 2022
Historique:
received:
10
03
2021
accepted:
28
12
2021
medline:
16
8
2023
pubmed:
24
1
2022
entrez:
23
1
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To develop a knowledge translation (KT) tool that will provide guidance to stakeholders actively planning or considering implementation of a health technology reassessment (HTR) initiative. The KT tool is an international and collaborative endeavour between HTR researchers in Canada, Australia, and the United Kingdom. Evidence from a meta-review of documented international HTR experiences and approaches provided the conceptual framing for the KT tool. The purpose, audience, format, and overall scope and content of the tool were established through iterative discussions and consensus. An initial version of the KT tool was beta-tested with an international community of relevant stakeholders (i.e., potential users) at the Health Technology Assessment International 2018 annual meeting. An open access workbook, referred to as the HTR playbook, was developed. As a KT tool, the HTR playbook is intended to simplify the complex HTR planning process by navigating users step-by-step through 6 strategic domains: characteristics of the candidate health technology ( The HTR playbook is intended to enhance a user's ability to successfully complete a HTR by helping them systematically consider the different elements and approaches to achieve the right care for the patient population in question.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
To develop a knowledge translation (KT) tool that will provide guidance to stakeholders actively planning or considering implementation of a health technology reassessment (HTR) initiative.
METHODS
The KT tool is an international and collaborative endeavour between HTR researchers in Canada, Australia, and the United Kingdom. Evidence from a meta-review of documented international HTR experiences and approaches provided the conceptual framing for the KT tool. The purpose, audience, format, and overall scope and content of the tool were established through iterative discussions and consensus. An initial version of the KT tool was beta-tested with an international community of relevant stakeholders (i.e., potential users) at the Health Technology Assessment International 2018 annual meeting.
RESULTS
An open access workbook, referred to as the HTR playbook, was developed. As a KT tool, the HTR playbook is intended to simplify the complex HTR planning process by navigating users step-by-step through 6 strategic domains: characteristics of the candidate health technology (
CONCLUSION
The HTR playbook is intended to enhance a user's ability to successfully complete a HTR by helping them systematically consider the different elements and approaches to achieve the right care for the patient population in question.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35065545
doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.180
pmc: PMC9818092
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2525-2532Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Références
JAMA. 2013 Feb 27;309(8):775-6
pubmed: 23443439
Med J Aust. 2009 Mar 2;190(5):269-73
pubmed: 19296794
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2015;31(6):355-62
pubmed: 26694654
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 15;18(1):640
pubmed: 30111308
Med J Aust. 2015 Aug 17;203(4):179-81
pubmed: 26268286
Can Fam Physician. 2017 Nov;63(11):853-858
pubmed: 29138155
SAGE Open Med. 2017 Apr 19;5:2050312117704861
pubmed: 28491310
Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2007 Oct 31;4:23
pubmed: 17973993
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 May 05;14:204
pubmed: 24885716
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013 Oct;29(4):418-23
pubmed: 24290335
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013 Apr;29(2):174-84
pubmed: 23514665
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Nov 11;14(1):82
pubmed: 27835964
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):132-40
pubmed: 26360830
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012 Jul;28(3):201-2
pubmed: 22980695
Implement Sci. 2020 Feb 14;15(1):11
pubmed: 32059738
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Mar 1;18(1):148
pubmed: 29490647
BMC Med. 2015 Oct 06;13:255
pubmed: 26444862
Aust Health Rev. 2012 May;36(2):148-52
pubmed: 22624634
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 5;9(3):e024142
pubmed: 30842110
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jul;174(7):1067-76
pubmed: 24819824
Med Care Res Rev. 2017 Oct;74(5):507-550
pubmed: 27402662
Health Econ. 2014 Apr;23(4):379-83
pubmed: 24590701
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 30;18(1):674
pubmed: 30165846
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018 Jan;34(2):212-217
pubmed: 29616604
J Health Organ Manag. 2013;27(6):762-80
pubmed: 24422258
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012 Jul;28(3):220-7
pubmed: 22980697
BMJ. 2020 Jan 28;368:m141
pubmed: 31992592
Lancet. 2017 Jul 8;390(10090):191-202
pubmed: 28077228