Efficacy of the adjuvanted subunit protein COVID-19 vaccine, SCB-2019: a phase 2 and 3 multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.
Adjuvants, Immunologic
/ therapeutic use
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Alum Compounds
/ therapeutic use
Belgium
Brazil
COVID-19
/ prevention & control
COVID-19 Vaccines
/ therapeutic use
Colombia
Double-Blind Method
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Oligodeoxyribonucleotides
/ therapeutic use
Philippines
Protein Multimerization
Recombinant Proteins
/ therapeutic use
Risk
SARS-CoV-2
South Africa
Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus
/ therapeutic use
Vaccine Efficacy
Young Adult
Journal
Lancet (London, England)
ISSN: 1474-547X
Titre abrégé: Lancet
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2985213R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 01 2022
29 01 2022
Historique:
received:
25
11
2021
revised:
05
12
2021
accepted:
21
12
2021
pubmed:
24
1
2022
medline:
4
2
2022
entrez:
23
1
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A range of safe and effective vaccines against SARS CoV 2 are needed to address the COVID 19 pandemic. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine SCB-2019. This ongoing phase 2 and 3 double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was done in adults aged 18 years and older who were in good health or with a stable chronic health condition, at 31 sites in five countries (Belgium, Brazil, Colombia, Philippines, and South Africa). The participants were randomly assigned 1:1 using a centralised internet randomisation system to receive two 0·5 mL intramuscular doses of SCB-2019 (30 μg, adjuvanted with 1·50 mg CpG-1018 and 0·75 mg alum) or placebo (0·9% sodium chloride for injection supplied in 10 mL ampoules) 21 days apart. All study staff and participants were masked, but vaccine administrators were not. Primary endpoints were vaccine efficacy, measured by RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 of any severity with onset from 14 days after the second dose in baseline SARS-CoV-2 seronegative participants (the per-protocol population), and the safety and solicited local and systemic adverse events in the phase 2 subset. This study is registered on EudraCT (2020-004272-17) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04672395). 30 174 participants were enrolled from March 24, 2021, until the cutoff date of Aug 10, 2021, of whom 30 128 received their first assigned vaccine (n=15 064) or a placebo injection (n=15 064). The per-protocol population consisted of 12 355 baseline SARS-CoV-2-naive participants (6251 vaccinees and 6104 placebo recipients). Most exclusions (13 389 [44·4%]) were because of seropositivity at baseline. There were 207 confirmed per-protocol cases of COVID-19 at 14 days after the second dose, 52 vaccinees versus 155 placebo recipients, and an overall vaccine efficacy against any severity COVID-19 of 67·2% (95·72% CI 54·3-76·8), 83·7% (97·86% CI 55·9-95·4) against moderate-to-severe COVID-19, and 100% (97·86% CI 25·3-100·0) against severe COVID-19. All COVID-19 cases were due to virus variants; vaccine efficacy against any severity COVID-19 due to the three predominant variants was 78·7% (95% CI 57·3-90·4) for delta, 91·8% (44·9-99·8) for gamma, and 58·6% (13·3-81·5) for mu. No safety issues emerged in the follow-up period for the efficacy analysis (median of 82 days [IQR 63-103]). The vaccine elicited higher rates of mainly mild-to-moderate injection site pain than the placebo after the first (35·7% [287 of 803] vs 10·3% [81 of 786]) and second (26·9% [189 of 702] vs 7·4% [52 of 699]) doses, but the rates of other solicited local and systemic adverse events were similar between the groups. Two doses of SCB-2019 vaccine plus CpG and alum provides notable protection against the entire severity spectrum of COVID-19 caused by circulating SAR-CoV-2 viruses, including the predominating delta variant. Clover Biopharmaceuticals and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
A range of safe and effective vaccines against SARS CoV 2 are needed to address the COVID 19 pandemic. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine SCB-2019.
METHODS
This ongoing phase 2 and 3 double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was done in adults aged 18 years and older who were in good health or with a stable chronic health condition, at 31 sites in five countries (Belgium, Brazil, Colombia, Philippines, and South Africa). The participants were randomly assigned 1:1 using a centralised internet randomisation system to receive two 0·5 mL intramuscular doses of SCB-2019 (30 μg, adjuvanted with 1·50 mg CpG-1018 and 0·75 mg alum) or placebo (0·9% sodium chloride for injection supplied in 10 mL ampoules) 21 days apart. All study staff and participants were masked, but vaccine administrators were not. Primary endpoints were vaccine efficacy, measured by RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 of any severity with onset from 14 days after the second dose in baseline SARS-CoV-2 seronegative participants (the per-protocol population), and the safety and solicited local and systemic adverse events in the phase 2 subset. This study is registered on EudraCT (2020-004272-17) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04672395).
FINDINGS
30 174 participants were enrolled from March 24, 2021, until the cutoff date of Aug 10, 2021, of whom 30 128 received their first assigned vaccine (n=15 064) or a placebo injection (n=15 064). The per-protocol population consisted of 12 355 baseline SARS-CoV-2-naive participants (6251 vaccinees and 6104 placebo recipients). Most exclusions (13 389 [44·4%]) were because of seropositivity at baseline. There were 207 confirmed per-protocol cases of COVID-19 at 14 days after the second dose, 52 vaccinees versus 155 placebo recipients, and an overall vaccine efficacy against any severity COVID-19 of 67·2% (95·72% CI 54·3-76·8), 83·7% (97·86% CI 55·9-95·4) against moderate-to-severe COVID-19, and 100% (97·86% CI 25·3-100·0) against severe COVID-19. All COVID-19 cases were due to virus variants; vaccine efficacy against any severity COVID-19 due to the three predominant variants was 78·7% (95% CI 57·3-90·4) for delta, 91·8% (44·9-99·8) for gamma, and 58·6% (13·3-81·5) for mu. No safety issues emerged in the follow-up period for the efficacy analysis (median of 82 days [IQR 63-103]). The vaccine elicited higher rates of mainly mild-to-moderate injection site pain than the placebo after the first (35·7% [287 of 803] vs 10·3% [81 of 786]) and second (26·9% [189 of 702] vs 7·4% [52 of 699]) doses, but the rates of other solicited local and systemic adverse events were similar between the groups.
INTERPRETATION
Two doses of SCB-2019 vaccine plus CpG and alum provides notable protection against the entire severity spectrum of COVID-19 caused by circulating SAR-CoV-2 viruses, including the predominating delta variant.
FUNDING
Clover Biopharmaceuticals and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35065705
pii: S0140-6736(22)00055-1
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00055-1
pmc: PMC8776284
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Adjuvants, Immunologic
0
Alum Compounds
0
COVID-19 Vaccines
0
Oligodeoxyribonucleotides
0
Recombinant Proteins
0
Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus
0
spike protein, SARS-CoV-2
0
1018 oligonucleotide
25DT549L0G
aluminum sulfate
34S289N54E
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04672395']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
461-472Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests IS, HHH, PLi, RH, CB, BH, and JL are full-time employees of Clover Biopharmaceuticals. FR is a statistical adviser for Clover Biopharmaceuticals. RC, DA, PR, and GS are scientific advisers for Clover Biopharmaceuticals. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 10;384(23):2187-2201
pubmed: 33882225
J Infect Dis. 2022 Jan 18;225(2):327-331
pubmed: 34888662
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Aug 24;75(1):e1128-e1136
pubmed: 34423834
N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 16;385(25):2397-2399
pubmed: 34731554
Nat Commun. 2021 Mar 1;12(1):1346
pubmed: 33649323
N Engl J Med. 2021 Sep 23;385(13):1172-1183
pubmed: 34192426
Lancet. 2021 Feb 20;397(10275):682-694
pubmed: 33524311
N Engl J Med. 2021 Aug 12;385(7):585-594
pubmed: 34289274
Lancet Microbe. 2021 Jul;2(7):e279-e280
pubmed: 33899038
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 31;383(27):2603-2615
pubmed: 33301246
Nature. 2020 Mar;579(7798):265-269
pubmed: 32015508
Lancet. 2021 Jul 17;398(10296):213-222
pubmed: 34246358
Stat Med. 1998 Apr 30;17(8):873-90
pubmed: 9595617
N Engl J Med. 2021 Sep 2;385(10):875-884
pubmed: 34233097
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 4;384(5):403-416
pubmed: 33378609
N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 16;385(25):2348-2360
pubmed: 34587382
J Virol. 2021 Mar 10;:
pubmed: 33692215
J Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 22;224(10):1699-1706
pubmed: 34480575