Single Center Evaluation of Comparative Breast Radiation dose of Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammography (CEDM), Digital Mammography (DM) and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT).


Journal

Academic radiology
ISSN: 1878-4046
Titre abrégé: Acad Radiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9440159

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2022
Historique:
received: 02 11 2021
revised: 17 12 2021
accepted: 22 12 2021
pubmed: 24 1 2022
medline: 3 8 2022
entrez: 23 1 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The aim of this retrospective study is to compare the radiation dose received during CEDM, short and long protocol (CEDM SP and CEDM LP), with dose received during DM and DBT on patients with varying breast thickness, age and density. Between January 2019 and December 2019, patients having 6214 DM, 3662 DBT and 173 CEDM examinations in our department were analyzed. Protocol total single breast AGD has been evaluated for all clinical imaging protocols, extracting AGD values and exposure data from the dose DICOM Structured Report (SR) information stored in the hospital PACS system. Protocol AGD was calculated as the sum of single projection AGDs carried out in every exam for each clinical protocol. A total amount of 23,383 exams for each breast were analyzed. Protocol AGDs, stratified as a function of patient breast compression thickness, age, and breast density were assessed. The total protocol AGD median values for each protocol are: 2.8 mGy for DM, 3.2 mGy for DBT, 6.0 mGy for DM+DBT, 4.5 mGy for CEDM SP, 7.4 mGy for CEDM SP_DBT (CEDM SP protocol with DBT), 8.4 mGy for CEDM LP and 11.6 mGy for CEDM LP_DBT (CEDM LP protocol with DBT). CEDM SP AGD median value is 59% higher than DM AGD median value and 40% lesser than DM+DBT AGD median; this last difference was statistically confirmed with a p-value <0.001. AGD value for each standard breast CEDM SP projection results to be below 3-mGy limit. AGD value for each standard breast CEDM SP projection results to be below 3 mGy, as required by international legislation. For dense breasts, the AGD median value is 4.2 mGy, with the first and third quartile of 3.3 mGy and 6.0 mGy respectively; for non-dense breasts, the AGD median value is 4.7 mGy, with first and third quartile of 3.5 mGy and 6.3 mGy respectively. The difference between the two groups was statistically tested and confirmed, with a p-value of 0.039. CEDM SP results in higher radiation exposure compared with conventional DM and DBT but lower than the Combo mode. The dose administered during the CEDM SP is lower in patients with dense breasts regardless of their size. An interesting outcome, considering the ongoing studies on CEDM screening in patients with dense breasts.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35065889
pii: S1076-6332(21)00616-4
doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.12.022
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1342-1349

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Giulia Bicchierai (G)

Diagnostic Senology Unit (G.B., F.D.N., D.D.B., E.S., C.B., J.N.), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo G. A. Brambilla 3, Florence, 50134, Tuscany, Italy; Health Physics Unit (S.B., P.T., S.B.), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Tuscany, Italy; Emergency Radiology Department (V.M.), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Tuscany, Italy. Electronic address: giulia.bicchierai@gmail.com.

Simone Busoni (S)

Diagnostic Senology Unit (G.B., F.D.N., D.D.B., E.S., C.B., J.N.), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo G. A. Brambilla 3, Florence, 50134, Tuscany, Italy; Health Physics Unit (S.B., P.T., S.B.), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Tuscany, Italy; Emergency Radiology Department (V.M.), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Tuscany, Italy.

Paolo Tortoli (P)

Diagnostic Senology Unit (G.B., F.D.N., D.D.B., E.S., C.B., J.N.), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo G. A. Brambilla 3, Florence, 50134, Tuscany, Italy; Health Physics Unit (S.B., P.T., S.B.), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Tuscany, Italy; Emergency Radiology Department (V.M.), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Tuscany, Italy.

Silvia Bettarini (S)

Diagnostic Senology Unit (G.B., F.D.N., D.D.B., E.S., C.B., J.N.), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo G. A. Brambilla 3, Florence, 50134, Tuscany, Italy; Health Physics Unit (S.B., P.T., S.B.), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Tuscany, Italy; Emergency Radiology Department (V.M.), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Tuscany, Italy.

Federica Di Naro (FD)

Diagnostic Senology Unit (G.B., F.D.N., D.D.B., E.S., C.B., J.N.), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo G. A. Brambilla 3, Florence, 50134, Tuscany, Italy; Health Physics Unit (S.B., P.T., S.B.), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Tuscany, Italy; Emergency Radiology Department (V.M.), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Tuscany, Italy.

Diego De Benedetto (D)

Diagnostic Senology Unit (G.B., F.D.N., D.D.B., E.S., C.B., J.N.), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo G. A. Brambilla 3, Florence, 50134, Tuscany, Italy; Health Physics Unit (S.B., P.T., S.B.), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Tuscany, Italy; Emergency Radiology Department (V.M.), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Tuscany, Italy.

Elena Savi (E)

Diagnostic Senology Unit (G.B., F.D.N., D.D.B., E.S., C.B., J.N.), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo G. A. Brambilla 3, Florence, 50134, Tuscany, Italy; Health Physics Unit (S.B., P.T., S.B.), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Tuscany, Italy; Emergency Radiology Department (V.M.), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Tuscany, Italy.

Chiara Bellini (C)

Diagnostic Senology Unit (G.B., F.D.N., D.D.B., E.S., C.B., J.N.), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo G. A. Brambilla 3, Florence, 50134, Tuscany, Italy; Health Physics Unit (S.B., P.T., S.B.), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Tuscany, Italy; Emergency Radiology Department (V.M.), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Tuscany, Italy.

Vittorio Miele (V)

Diagnostic Senology Unit (G.B., F.D.N., D.D.B., E.S., C.B., J.N.), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo G. A. Brambilla 3, Florence, 50134, Tuscany, Italy; Health Physics Unit (S.B., P.T., S.B.), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Tuscany, Italy; Emergency Radiology Department (V.M.), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Tuscany, Italy.

Jacopo Nori (J)

Diagnostic Senology Unit (G.B., F.D.N., D.D.B., E.S., C.B., J.N.), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo G. A. Brambilla 3, Florence, 50134, Tuscany, Italy; Health Physics Unit (S.B., P.T., S.B.), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Tuscany, Italy; Emergency Radiology Department (V.M.), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Tuscany, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH