Periumbilical Transverse Incision for Reducing Incisional Hernia in Laparoscopic Colon Cancer Surgery.
Journal
World journal of surgery
ISSN: 1432-2323
Titre abrégé: World J Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7704052
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2022
Apr 2022
Historique:
accepted:
04
09
2021
pubmed:
26
1
2022
medline:
23
4
2022
entrez:
25
1
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Although off-midline incisions (unilateral low transverse or Pfannenstiel incision) have been reported to have a lower incidence of incisional hernia (IH) than periumbilical vertical incision for the purpose of specimen extraction, it is most commonly used in laparoscopic colon cancer surgery because off-midline incisions are associated with the limitation of colon exteriorization. This study aims to investigate the risk of IH after laparoscopic colectomy and compare midline vertical incision versus transverse incision focusing on the incidence of IH. Patients who underwent elective laparoscopic colectomy due to colon malignancy from June 2015 to May 2017 were included. All patients had either vertical (n = 429) or muscle splitting periumbilical transverse incisions (n = 125). Median duration of the follow-up period was 23.6 months, during which IHs occurred in 12.1% patients. The incidence of hernia was significantly lower in the transverse group (3 vs. 64, 2.4% vs. 14.9%, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, BMI ≥ 23 [odds ratio (OR) 2.282, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.245-4.182, p = 0.008], postoperative surgical site infection (OR 3.780, 95% CI 1.969-7.254, p < 0.001) and vertical incision (OR 7.113, 95% CI 2.173-23.287, p < 0.001) were independently related with increased incidence of IH. A muscle splitting periumbilical transverse incision could significantly reduce the rate of IH in minimally invasive colon cancer surgery.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Although off-midline incisions (unilateral low transverse or Pfannenstiel incision) have been reported to have a lower incidence of incisional hernia (IH) than periumbilical vertical incision for the purpose of specimen extraction, it is most commonly used in laparoscopic colon cancer surgery because off-midline incisions are associated with the limitation of colon exteriorization. This study aims to investigate the risk of IH after laparoscopic colectomy and compare midline vertical incision versus transverse incision focusing on the incidence of IH.
METHODS
METHODS
Patients who underwent elective laparoscopic colectomy due to colon malignancy from June 2015 to May 2017 were included. All patients had either vertical (n = 429) or muscle splitting periumbilical transverse incisions (n = 125).
RESULTS
RESULTS
Median duration of the follow-up period was 23.6 months, during which IHs occurred in 12.1% patients. The incidence of hernia was significantly lower in the transverse group (3 vs. 64, 2.4% vs. 14.9%, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, BMI ≥ 23 [odds ratio (OR) 2.282, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.245-4.182, p = 0.008], postoperative surgical site infection (OR 3.780, 95% CI 1.969-7.254, p < 0.001) and vertical incision (OR 7.113, 95% CI 2.173-23.287, p < 0.001) were independently related with increased incidence of IH.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
A muscle splitting periumbilical transverse incision could significantly reduce the rate of IH in minimally invasive colon cancer surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35076822
doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06319-6
pii: 10.1007/s00268-021-06319-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
916-924Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Société Internationale de Chirurgie.
Références
Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09290-5
Jane C, Weeks HN, Gelber S, Sargent D, Schroeder G (2002) Short term quality of life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer—a randomized trial. JAMA 287:321–328
doi: 10.1001/jama.287.3.321
Kössler-Ebs JB, Grummich K, Jensen K et al (2016) Incisional hernia rates after laparoscopic or open abdominal surgery—a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg 40:2319–2330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3520-3
doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3520-3
pubmed: 27146053
Pecorelli N, Greco M, Amodeo S et al (2017) Small bowel obstruction and incisional hernia after laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of comparative trials. Surg Endosc 31:85–99
doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4995-6
Petersson J, Koedam TW, Bonjer HJ et al (2019) Bowel obstruction and ventral hernia after laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer in a randomized trial (COLOR II). Ann Surg 269:53–57
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002790
Lee L, Abou-Khalil M, Liberman S et al (2017) Incidence of incisional hernia in the specimen extraction site for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 31:5083–5093
doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5573-2
Krpata DM, Schmotzer BJ, Flocke S et al (2012) Design and initial implementation of HerQLes: a hernia-related quality-of-life survey to assess abdominal wall function. J Am Coll Surg 215:635–642
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.06.412
Lee L, Mata J, Droeser RA et al (2018) Incisional hernia after midline versus transverse specimen extraction incision. Ann Surg 268:41–47
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002615
Deerenberg EB, Harlaar JJ, Steyerberg EW et al (2015) Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 386:1254–1260
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60459-7
Schiessel R, Novi G, Holzer B et al (2005) Technique and long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1858–1865 (discussion 1865–1857)
doi: 10.1007/s10350-005-0134-5
Sylla P, Rattner DW, Delgado S et al (2010) NOTES transanal rectal cancer resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery and laparoscopic assistance. Surg Endosc 24:1205–1210
doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0965-6
Kim SJ, Choi BJ, Lee SC (2014) Successful total shift from multiport to single-port laparoscopic surgery in low anterior resection of colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 28:2920–2930
doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3554-2
Sajid MS, Bhatti MI, Sains P et al (2014) Specimen retrieval approaches in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resections: a literature-based review of published studies. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2:251–261
doi: 10.1093/gastro/gou053
Navaratnam AV, Ariyaratnam R, Smart NJ et al (2015) Incisional hernia rate after laparoscopic colorectal resection is reduced with standardisation of specimen extraction. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 97:17–21
doi: 10.1308/003588414X14055925058274
Tiffany Jackson JE (2010) Single-port gynecologic surgery. Rev Obstet Gynecol 3:133–139
pubmed: 21364865
pmcid: 3046758
Kaouk JH, Haber GP, Goel RK et al (2008) Single-port laparoscopic surgery in urology: initial experience. Urology 71:3–6
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.034
Grantcharov TP, Rosenberg J (2001) Vertical compared with transverse incisions in abdominal surgery. Eur J Surg 167:260–267
doi: 10.1080/110241501300091408
John HT, Waldhausen LD (2000) Pediatric postoperative abdominal wound dehiscence: transverse versus vertical incisions. J Am Coll Surg 160:688–691
Marks JM, Phillips MS, Tacchino R et al (2013) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216:1037–1047 (discussion 1047–1038)
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.02.024
Yamamoto M, Asakuma M, Tanaka K et al (2019) Clinical impact of single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal resection for advanced colon cancer: propensity score matching analysis. Surg Endosc 33:3616–3622
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06647-0
Fink C, Baumann P, Wente MN et al (2014) Incisional hernia rate 3 years after midline laparotomy. Br J Surg 101:51–54
doi: 10.1002/bjs.9364
Höer J, Lawong G, Klinge U, Schumpelick V (2014) Factors influencing the development of incisional hernia. a retrospective study of 2983 laparotomy patients over a period of 10 years. Chirurg 73:174–480
Claes K, Beckers R, Heindryckx E et al (2014) Retrospective observational study on the incidence of incisional hernias after colorectal carcinoma resection with follow-up CT scan. Hernia 18:797–802
doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1214-z