[German-language translation of the PANELVIEW instrument to evaluate the guideline development process from the perspective of the guideline group].

Deutschsprachige Übersetzung des PANELVIEW Instruments zur Evaluierung des Prozesses der Leitlinienentwicklung aus der Perspektive der Leitliniengruppe.
Evaluation Guideline development Guidelines Leitlinien Leitlinienentwicklung Process Prozess Survey Umfrage

Journal

Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen
ISSN: 2212-0289
Titre abrégé: Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101477604

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Historique:
received: 20 09 2021
accepted: 21 11 2021
pubmed: 27 1 2022
medline: 6 5 2022
entrez: 26 1 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The development process for clinical guidelines is influenced by factors that are relevant to the validity of a guideline but often are not captured sufficiently in the final guideline documents. PANELVIEW is an English-language tool that can be used to explore the guideline development process from the perspective of guideline group members. Our aim was to translate the PANELVIEW tool into German, taking into account national contexts and linguistic differences. The PANELVIEW tool was initially translated by a core team, then refined and approved by a group of experts in a consensus-based Delphi process. The experts were selected on the basis of their experience in guideline development covering different fields (clinical, methodological, organisational, health professional, patient perspective) and geographical regions (Germany, Austria, Switzerland). A representative of the original PANELVIEW team was also involved. The Delphi steps included an online survey, an online consensus conference and final approval by circulating the results via email. Individual items were seen as generally agreed upon if the level of agreement in the respective steps was 75 % or more. The expert group consisted of 12 persons. Of these, 11 (92 %) participated in the online survey and 10 (83 %) in the subsequent consensus conference. After the first Delphi step, sufficient agreement was achieved for 19 of 34 items (56 %). The remaining 15 items were discussed in the consensus conference and finally obtained 100 % agreement. The discussion focused on clarifying and adapting terms whose meaning was ambiguous or inadequate in the German context, which led to a deviation from the original wording in some instances. The PANELVIEW tool was translated into German by means of a Delphi process. PANELVIEW complements existing instruments for assessing the methodological quality of guidelines by capturing the perspective of the guideline group. This will enable guideline developers and organisations to identify problems in the drafting process and avoid them in future projects. User testing and validation of the German-language PANELVIEW tool are planned for the future. The German-language translation of PANELVIEW will enable guideline developers in German-speaking countries to continuously evaluate and, where necessary, improve the process and methods of guideline development.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35078748
pii: S1865-9217(21)00217-8
doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2021.11.004
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

ger

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

106-112

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

Auteurs

Käthe Goossen (K)

Abteilung für evidenzbasierte Versorgungsforschung, Institut für Forschung in der Operativen Medizin (IFOM), Universität Witten/Herdecke, Köln, Deutschland. Electronic address: kaethe.goossen@uni-wh.de.

Monika Becker (M)

Abteilung für evidenzbasierte Versorgungsforschung, Institut für Forschung in der Operativen Medizin (IFOM), Universität Witten/Herdecke, Köln, Deutschland.

Tim Mathes (T)

Abteilung für evidenzbasierte Versorgungsforschung, Institut für Forschung in der Operativen Medizin (IFOM), Universität Witten/Herdecke, Köln, Deutschland.

Markus Follmann (M)

Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Berlin, Deutschland.

Ulrike Holtkamp (U)

Deutsche Leukämie- & Lymphom-Hilfe e.V., Bonn, Deutschland.

Stefanie Hostettler (S)

FMH - Verbindung der Schweizer Ärztinnen und Ärzte, Bern, Schweiz.

Joerg J Meerpohl (JJ)

Institut für Evidenz in der Medizin, Universitätsklinikum & Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Freiburg & Cochrane Deutschland Stiftung, Freiburg, Deutschland.

Monika Nothacker (M)

AWMF Institut für Medizinisches Wissensmanagement, c/o Philipps Universität Marburg/AWMF Berlin, Deutschland.

Corinna Schaefer (C)

Ärztliches Zentrum für Qualität in der Medizin, Berlin, Deutschland.

Stefanie Schmidt (S)

UroEvidence@Deutsche Gesellschaft für Urologie, Berlin, Deutschland.

Holger J Schünemann (HJ)

Michael G DeGroote Cochrane Canada and McMaster GRADE centres; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Kanada.

Isolde Sommer (I)

Donau-Universität Krems, Department für Evidenzbasierte Medizin und Evaluation, Krems, Österreich.

Rheina Tholen (R)

Deutscher Verband für Physiotherapie (ZVK) e.v., Kompetenzzentrum Wissenschaft, Forschung, Aus-, Fort- und Weiterbildung, Köln, Deutschland.

Nicole Skoetz (N)

Evidenz-basierte Onkologie, Klinik I für Innere Medizin, Centrum für Integrierte Onkologie Aachen Bonn Köln Düsseldorf, Universität zu Köln, Medizinische Fakultät und Uniklinik Köln, Köln, Deutschland.

Dawid Pieper (D)

Abteilung für evidenzbasierte Versorgungsforschung, Institut für Forschung in der Operativen Medizin (IFOM), Universität Witten/Herdecke, Köln, Deutschland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH