Unravelling biogeochemical drivers of methylmercury production in an Arctic fen soil and a bog soil.


Journal

Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)
ISSN: 1873-6424
Titre abrégé: Environ Pollut
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8804476

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Apr 2022
Historique:
received: 14 07 2021
revised: 19 01 2022
accepted: 20 01 2022
pubmed: 28 1 2022
medline: 23 2 2022
entrez: 27 1 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Arctic tundra soils store a globally significant amount of mercury (Hg), which could be transformed to the neurotoxic methylmercury (MeHg) upon warming and thus poses serious threats to the Arctic ecosystem. However, our knowledge of the biogeochemical drivers of MeHg production is limited in these soils. Using substrate addition (acetate and sulfate) and selective microbial inhibition approaches, we investigated the geochemical drivers and dominant microbial methylators in 60-day microcosm incubations with two tundra soils: a circumneutral fen soil and an acidic bog soil, collected near Nome, Alaska, United States. Results showed that increasing acetate concentration had negligible influences on MeHg production in both soils. However, inhibition of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) completely stalled MeHg production in the fen soil in the first 15 days, whereas addition of sulfate in the low-sulfate bog soil increased MeHg production by 5-fold, suggesting prominent roles of SRB in Hg(II) methylation. Without the addition of sulfate in the bog soil or when sulfate was depleted in the fen soil (after 15 days), both SRB and methanogens contributed to MeHg production. Analysis of microbial community composition confirmed the presence of several phyla known to harbor microorganisms associated with Hg(II) methylation in the soils. The observations suggest that SRB and methanogens were mainly responsible for Hg(II) methylation in these tundra soils, although their relative contributions depended on the availability of sulfate and possibly syntrophic metabolisms between SRB and methanogens.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35085651
pii: S0269-7491(22)00092-6
doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.118878
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Methylmercury Compounds 0
Soil 0
Soil Pollutants 0
Mercury FXS1BY2PGL

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

118878

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Lijie Zhang (L)

Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 37831, USA; Department of Chemistry and Environmental Science, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA.

Michael Philben (M)

Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 37831, USA.

Neslihan Taş (N)

Climate and Ecosystem Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, USA.

Alexander Johs (A)

Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 37831, USA.

Ziming Yang (Z)

Department of Chemistry, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, 48309, USA.

Stan D Wullschleger (SD)

Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 37831, USA.

David E Graham (DE)

Biosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 37831, USA.

Eric M Pierce (EM)

Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 37831, USA.

Baohua Gu (B)

Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 37831, USA. Electronic address: gub1@ornl.gov.

Articles similaires

Populus Soil Microbiology Soil Microbiota Fungi
Coal Metagenome Phylogeny Bacteria Genome, Bacterial
Lakes Salinity Archaea Bacteria Microbiota
Nigeria Environmental Monitoring Solid Waste Waste Disposal Facilities Refuse Disposal

Classifications MeSH