Rationale, design and methods of VA-BRAVE: a randomized comparative effectiveness trial of two formulations of buprenorphine for treatment of opioid use disorder in veterans.


Journal

Addiction science & clinical practice
ISSN: 1940-0640
Titre abrégé: Addict Sci Clin Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101316917

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
31 01 2022
Historique:
received: 27 04 2021
accepted: 10 01 2022
entrez: 1 2 2022
pubmed: 2 2 2022
medline: 5 2 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To address the US opioid epidemic, there is an urgent clinical need to provide persons with opioid use disorder (OUD) with effective medication treatments for OUD (MOUD). Formulations of sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone (SL-BUP/NLX) are considered the standard of care for OUD including within the Veterans Healthcare Administration (VHA). However, poor retention on MOUD undermines its effectiveness. Long-acting injectable monthly buprenorphine (INJ-BUP) (e.g., Sublocade®) has the potential to improve retention and therefore reduce opioid use and overdose. Designing and conducting studies for OUD pose unique challenges. The strategies and solutions to some of these considerations in designing Cooperative Studies Program (CSP) 2014, Buprenorphine for Treating Opioid Use Disorder in Veterans (VA-BRAVE), a randomized, 20-site, clinical effectiveness trial comparing INJ-BUP to SL-BUP/NLX conducted within the VHA may provide valuable guidance for others confronted with similar investigation challenges. This 52-week, parallel group, open-label, randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluates the comparative effectiveness of two current FDA-approved formulations of buprenorphine: (1) daily SL-BUP/NLX vs. (2) monthly (28-day) INJ-BUP for Veterans with moderate to severe OUD (n = 952). The primary outcomes are (1) retention in MOUD and (2) opioid abstinence. Secondary outcomes include measures of other drug use, psychiatric symptoms, medical outcomes including prevalence rates of HIV, hepatitis B and C as well as social outcomes (housing instability, criminal justice involvement), service utilization and cost-effectiveness. Special considerations in conducting a comparative effectiveness trial with this population and during COVID-19 pandemic were also included. The evaluation of the extended-release formulation of buprenorphine compared to the standard sublingual formulation in real-world VHA settings is of paramount importance in addressing the opioid epidemic. The extent to which this new treatment facilitates retention, decreases opioid use, and prevents severe sequelae of OUD has not been studied in any long-term trial to date. Positive findings in this trial could lead to widespread adoption of MOUD, and, if proven superior INJ-BUP, by clinicians throughout the VHA and beyond. This treatment has the potential to reduce opioid use among Veterans, improve medical, psychological, and social outcomes, and save lives at justifiable cost. Trial registration Registered at Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04375033.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
To address the US opioid epidemic, there is an urgent clinical need to provide persons with opioid use disorder (OUD) with effective medication treatments for OUD (MOUD). Formulations of sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone (SL-BUP/NLX) are considered the standard of care for OUD including within the Veterans Healthcare Administration (VHA). However, poor retention on MOUD undermines its effectiveness. Long-acting injectable monthly buprenorphine (INJ-BUP) (e.g., Sublocade®) has the potential to improve retention and therefore reduce opioid use and overdose. Designing and conducting studies for OUD pose unique challenges. The strategies and solutions to some of these considerations in designing Cooperative Studies Program (CSP) 2014, Buprenorphine for Treating Opioid Use Disorder in Veterans (VA-BRAVE), a randomized, 20-site, clinical effectiveness trial comparing INJ-BUP to SL-BUP/NLX conducted within the VHA may provide valuable guidance for others confronted with similar investigation challenges.
METHODS
This 52-week, parallel group, open-label, randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluates the comparative effectiveness of two current FDA-approved formulations of buprenorphine: (1) daily SL-BUP/NLX vs. (2) monthly (28-day) INJ-BUP for Veterans with moderate to severe OUD (n = 952). The primary outcomes are (1) retention in MOUD and (2) opioid abstinence. Secondary outcomes include measures of other drug use, psychiatric symptoms, medical outcomes including prevalence rates of HIV, hepatitis B and C as well as social outcomes (housing instability, criminal justice involvement), service utilization and cost-effectiveness. Special considerations in conducting a comparative effectiveness trial with this population and during COVID-19 pandemic were also included.
DISCUSSION
The evaluation of the extended-release formulation of buprenorphine compared to the standard sublingual formulation in real-world VHA settings is of paramount importance in addressing the opioid epidemic. The extent to which this new treatment facilitates retention, decreases opioid use, and prevents severe sequelae of OUD has not been studied in any long-term trial to date. Positive findings in this trial could lead to widespread adoption of MOUD, and, if proven superior INJ-BUP, by clinicians throughout the VHA and beyond. This treatment has the potential to reduce opioid use among Veterans, improve medical, psychological, and social outcomes, and save lives at justifiable cost. Trial registration Registered at Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04375033.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35101115
doi: 10.1186/s13722-022-00286-6
pii: 10.1186/s13722-022-00286-6
pmc: PMC8802273
doi:

Substances chimiques

Narcotic Antagonists 0
Buprenorphine 40D3SCR4GZ

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04375033']

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

6

Subventions

Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001863
Pays : United States
Organisme : U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
ID : Cooperative Studies Program

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Drug Alcohol Depend. 1996 Sep;42(1):49-54
pubmed: 8889403
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2018 Feb;85:90-96
pubmed: 28733097
J Addict Dis. 2016;35(1):22-35
pubmed: 26467975
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2016 Jun;30(2):134-7
pubmed: 27301690
Lancet. 2019 Feb 23;393(10173):778-790
pubmed: 30792007
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2003 Apr;24(3):233-9
pubmed: 12810144
J Addict Med. 2020 Mar/Apr;14(2S Suppl 1):1-91
pubmed: 32511106
JAMA. 2015 Oct 13;314(14):1468-78
pubmed: 26461997
J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59 Suppl 20:22-33;quiz 34-57
pubmed: 9881538
J Opioid Manag. 2018 May/Jun;14(3):171-182
pubmed: 30044482
BMJ. 2017 Apr 26;357:j1947
pubmed: 28446438
Subst Abus. 2018;39(2):139-144
pubmed: 29595375
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Jul;57(1):106-110
pubmed: 31128955
JAMA. 1977 Mar 21;237(12):1216-20
pubmed: 576458
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2003 Apr-Jun;35(2):253-9
pubmed: 12924748
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e38335
pubmed: 22719814
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jun 1;178(6):764-773
pubmed: 29799968
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2012 Dec;43(4):451-7
pubmed: 22534003
NCHS Data Brief. 2017 Dec;(294):1-8
pubmed: 29319475
Control Clin Trials. 2004 Aug;25(4):378-87
pubmed: 15296812
J Stud Alcohol. 1995 Jul;56(4):423-32
pubmed: 7674678
Addiction. 2019 Aug;114(8):1416-1426
pubmed: 31013390
PLoS One. 2020 May 14;15(5):e0232086
pubmed: 32407321
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1992;18(3):289-303
pubmed: 1329492
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Mar 20;69(11):290-297
pubmed: 32191688
Br J Addict. 1989 Nov;84(11):1353-7
pubmed: 2597811
Subst Abus. 2020;41(3):275-282
pubmed: 32697170
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Sep 01;66(34):897-903
pubmed: 28859052
Am J Addict. 2017 Sep;26(6):572-580
pubmed: 28472543
JAMA. 2020 Oct 27;324(16):1615-1617
pubmed: 32945831
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2005 Jun;28(4):321-9
pubmed: 15925266
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 28;375(4):357-68
pubmed: 27464203
J Urban Health. 2010 Jul;87(4):592-602
pubmed: 20177974
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13
pubmed: 11556941
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 May 1;177(5):611-612
pubmed: 28288245
Am J Addict. 2020 Jul;29(4):249-267
pubmed: 32346932

Auteurs

Ismene Petrakis (I)

Department of Psychiatry, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA. Ismene.Petrakis@yale.edu.
Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. Ismene.Petrakis@yale.edu.

Sandra A Springer (SA)

Section of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA.
Section of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

Cynthia Davis (C)

US Department of Veteran Affairs, Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center (CSPCC), Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Elizabeth Ralevski (E)

Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Section of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

Lucy Gu (L)

Department of Psychiatry, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

Robert Lew (R)

Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Jamaica Plain, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.

John Hermos (J)

Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, VA Boston Healthcare System, Jamaica Plain, Boston, MA, USA.

Adam J Gordon (AJ)

Informatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Program for Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge and Advocacy (PARCKA), University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Thomas R Kosten (TR)

Department of Psychiatry, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

Edward V Nunes (EV)

Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

Robert Rosenheck (R)

Department of Psychiatry, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

Andrew J Saxon (AJ)

Center of Excellence in Substance Addiction Treatment and Education, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.

Robert Swift (R)

Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, RI, USA.

Alexa Goldberg (A)

US Department of Veteran Affairs, Cooperative Studies Program Clinical Research Pharmacy Coordinating Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.

Robert Ringer (R)

US Department of Veteran Affairs, Cooperative Studies Program Clinical Research Pharmacy Coordinating Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.

Ryan Ferguson (R)

US Department of Veteran Affairs, Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center (CSPCC), Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH