Investigation of the critical factors required to improve the disclosure and discussion of harm with affected women and families: a study protocol for a qualitative, realist study in NHS maternity services (the DISCERN study).
health policy
maternal medicine
organisation of health services
protocols & guidelines
quality in health care
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 02 2022
03 02 2022
Historique:
entrez:
4
2
2022
pubmed:
5
2
2022
medline:
23
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Patients and families are entitled to an open disclosure and discussion of healthcare incidents affecting them. This reduces distress and contributes to learning for safety improvement. Complex barriers prevent effective disclosure and continue in the English NHS, despite a legal duty of candour. NHS maternity services are the focus of significant efforts to improve this. There is limited understanding of how, and to what effect, they are achieving this. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A 27-month, three-phased realist evaluation identifying the critical factors contributing to improvements in the disclosure and discussion of incidents with affected families. The evaluation asks 'what works, for whom, in what circumstances, in why respects and why?'.Phase 1: establish working hypotheses of key factors and outcomes of interventions improving disclosure and discussion, by realist literature review and in-depth realist interviews with key stakeholders (n=approximately 20]Phase 2: refine or overturn hypotheses, by ethnographic case-study analysis using triangulated qualitative methods (non-participant observation, interviews (n=12) and documentary analysis) in up to 4 purposively sampled NHS trusts.Phase 3: consider hypotheses and design outputs during seven interpretive forums. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Phase 1 study approval by King's College London's Ethics Panel (BDMRESC 22033) and National Research Ethical Approval for Phases 2-3 (IRASID:262197) (CAG:20/CAG/0121) (REC:20/LO/1152). Study sponsorship by King's College London (HS&DR 17/99/85).Findings to be disseminated through tailored management briefings; clinician and family guidance (written and video); lay summaries, academic papers, and report with outputs tailored to maximise academic and societal impact. Views of women/family groups are represented throughout.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35115347
pii: bmjopen-2020-048285
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048285
pmc: PMC8814750
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e048285Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Implement Sci. 2013 Jun 20;8:70
pubmed: 23786847
J Med Ethics. 2005 Feb;31(2):106-8
pubmed: 15681676
Nurse Res. 2011;19(1):12-6
pubmed: 22128582
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Nov;23(11):880-3
pubmed: 25049424
BMC Med. 2013 Jan 29;11:21
pubmed: 23360677
BMC Med. 2016 Jun 24;14(1):96
pubmed: 27342217
BMJ. 2011 Jul 25;343:d4423
pubmed: 21788260
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51
pubmed: 24979285
J Patient Saf. 2017 Mar;13(1):43-49
pubmed: 24717530
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Feb;23(2):99-105
pubmed: 24096894