Digital Nerve Management and Neuroma Prevention in Hand Amputations.
amputation
digital nerve
neuroma
Journal
Hand (New York, N.Y.)
ISSN: 1558-9455
Titre abrégé: Hand (N Y)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101264149
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2023
07 2023
Historique:
pmc-release:
01
07
2024
medline:
12
7
2023
pubmed:
9
2
2022
entrez:
8
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Hand and digit amputations represent a relatively common injury affecting an active patient population. Neuroma formation following amputation at the level of the digital nerve can cause significant disability and lead to revision surgery. One method for managing digital nerves in primary and revision partial hand amputations is to perform interdigital end-to-end nerve coaptations to prevent neuroma formation. All patients with an amputation at the level of the common or proper digital nerves that had appropriate follow-up at our institution from 2010 to 2020 were included. Common or proper digital nerves were managed with either traction neurectomy or digital end-to-end neurorrhaphy. The primary outcome was the development of a neuroma. Secondary outcomes included revision surgery, complications, and visual analog pain scores. A total of 289 nerves in 54 patients underwent hand or digital amputation in the study period. Thirteen hands with 78 nerves (27%) underwent direct end-to-end coaptation with a postoperative neuroma incidence of 12.8% compared with 22.7% in the 211 nerves that did not have a coaptation performed. Significantly fewer patients reported persistent pain if an end-to-end coaptation was performed (0% vs. 11.8%, Digital nerve end-to-end neurorrhaphy is a method for neuroma prevention in partial hand amputations that results in decreased residual hand pain without increase complications. Depression and worker's compensations status were significantly associated with symptomatic neuroma formation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Hand and digit amputations represent a relatively common injury affecting an active patient population. Neuroma formation following amputation at the level of the digital nerve can cause significant disability and lead to revision surgery. One method for managing digital nerves in primary and revision partial hand amputations is to perform interdigital end-to-end nerve coaptations to prevent neuroma formation.
METHODS
All patients with an amputation at the level of the common or proper digital nerves that had appropriate follow-up at our institution from 2010 to 2020 were included. Common or proper digital nerves were managed with either traction neurectomy or digital end-to-end neurorrhaphy. The primary outcome was the development of a neuroma. Secondary outcomes included revision surgery, complications, and visual analog pain scores.
RESULTS
A total of 289 nerves in 54 patients underwent hand or digital amputation in the study period. Thirteen hands with 78 nerves (27%) underwent direct end-to-end coaptation with a postoperative neuroma incidence of 12.8% compared with 22.7% in the 211 nerves that did not have a coaptation performed. Significantly fewer patients reported persistent pain if an end-to-end coaptation was performed (0% vs. 11.8%,
CONCLUSIONS
Digital nerve end-to-end neurorrhaphy is a method for neuroma prevention in partial hand amputations that results in decreased residual hand pain without increase complications. Depression and worker's compensations status were significantly associated with symptomatic neuroma formation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35130747
doi: 10.1177/15589447211065074
pmc: PMC10336821
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
838-844Références
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Mar;137(3):576e-585e
pubmed: 26910702
Disabil Rehabil. 2007 Sep 15;29(17):1317-21
pubmed: 17729079
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Mar;121(3):908-914
pubmed: 18317139
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Aug 08;7(8):e2376
pubmed: 31592032
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Sep;142(3):709-716
pubmed: 29927836
J Hand Surg Am. 2011 Nov;36(11):1835-40
pubmed: 21975098
J Hand Surg Am. 2020 Sep;45(9):884.e1-884.e6
pubmed: 31818541
J Hand Surg Am. 2019 Feb;44(2):163.e1-163.e5
pubmed: 29908928
Ann Surg. 2019 Aug;270(2):238-246
pubmed: 30371518
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
J Hand Surg Am. 2018 Jan;43(1):86.e1-86.e8
pubmed: 28951100
J Hand Surg Am. 2018 Apr;43(4):e1
pubmed: 29618420
Clin Plast Surg. 2020 Apr;47(2):311-321
pubmed: 32115057
Ann Plast Surg. 2019 Apr;82(4):420-427
pubmed: 30855369
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2015 Apr;157(4):667-71
pubmed: 25534125
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013 Oct;66(10):1330-4
pubmed: 23845907
Prosthet Orthot Int. 1996 Dec;20(3):176-81
pubmed: 8985997
Ann Plast Surg. 2017 Oct;79(4):377-384
pubmed: 28570461
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984 Feb;73(2):293-9
pubmed: 6695026
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Apr;104(2):273-276
pubmed: 29410334
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Sep;29(9):e321-5
pubmed: 25875175
JB JS Open Access. 2018 Apr 24;3(2):e0038
pubmed: 30280131
J Hand Microsurg. 2019 Oct;11(Suppl 1):S50-S52
pubmed: 31616128
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Feb;139(2):407-418
pubmed: 28125533
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Oct 16;6(10):e1952
pubmed: 30534497