Comprehensive Species Sampling and Sophisticated Algorithmic Approaches Refute the Monophyly of Arachnida.
Chelicerata
orthologs
phylogenomics
supermatrix
total evidence
Journal
Molecular biology and evolution
ISSN: 1537-1719
Titre abrégé: Mol Biol Evol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8501455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 02 2022
03 02 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
10
2
2022
medline:
1
4
2022
entrez:
9
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Deciphering the evolutionary relationships of Chelicerata (arachnids, horseshoe crabs, and allied taxa) has proven notoriously difficult, due to their ancient rapid radiation and the incidence of elevated evolutionary rates in several lineages. Although conflicting hypotheses prevail in morphological and molecular data sets alike, the monophyly of Arachnida is nearly universally accepted, despite historical lack of support in molecular data sets. Some phylotranscriptomic analyses have recovered arachnid monophyly, but these did not sample all living orders, whereas analyses including all orders have failed to recover Arachnida. To understand this conflict, we assembled a data set of 506 high-quality genomes and transcriptomes, sampling all living orders of Chelicerata with high occupancy and rigorous approaches to orthology inference. Our analyses consistently recovered the nested placement of horseshoe crabs within a paraphyletic Arachnida. This result was insensitive to variation in evolutionary rates of genes, complexity of the substitution models, and alternative algorithmic approaches to species tree inference. Investigation of sources of systematic bias showed that genes and sites that recover arachnid monophyly are enriched in noise and exhibit low information content. To test the impact of morphological data, we generated a 514-taxon morphological data matrix of extant and fossil Chelicerata, analyzed in tandem with the molecular matrix. Combined analyses recovered the clade Merostomata (the marine orders Xiphosura, Eurypterida, and Chasmataspidida), but merostomates appeared nested within Arachnida. Our results suggest that morphological convergence resulting from adaptations to life in terrestrial habitats has driven the historical perception of arachnid monophyly, paralleling the history of numerous other invertebrate terrestrial groups.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35137183
pii: 6522129
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msac021
pmc: PMC8845124
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution.
Références
G3 (Bethesda). 2021 Dec 8;11(12):
pubmed: 34849767
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007 Jun;43(3):936-51
pubmed: 17197202
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2006 Sep;40(3):772-94
pubmed: 16781168
Bioinformatics. 2015 Oct 1;31(19):3210-2
pubmed: 26059717
Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Sep;24(9):2139-50
pubmed: 17652333
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2018 Feb;119:105-117
pubmed: 29074461
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 9;10(1):101
pubmed: 31919367
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Aug 11;288(1956):20211168
pubmed: 34344178
Curr Biol. 2017 Apr 3;27(7):958-967
pubmed: 28318975
Curr Biol. 2015 Aug 3;25(15):1993-9
pubmed: 26212885
Evol Bioinform Online. 2020 Feb 5;16:1176934320903735
pubmed: 32076367
Syst Biol. 2017 Mar 01;66(2):232-255
pubmed: 27633354
Curr Biol. 2019 Jun 17;29(12):R592-R602
pubmed: 31211983
Mol Biol Evol. 2021 Aug 23;38(9):4025-4038
pubmed: 33983409
Syst Biol. 2019 Nov 1;68(6):1003-1019
pubmed: 31140564
Front Zool. 2018 Dec 19;15:52
pubmed: 30574172
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Apr 7;282(1804):20142953
pubmed: 25716788
Curr Biol. 2016 Jan 25;26(2):224-229
pubmed: 26776737
Cladistics. 2000 Jun;16(2):155-203
pubmed: 34902956
Syst Biol. 2018 Sep 1;67(5):901-904
pubmed: 29718447
Curr Biol. 2014 May 5;24(9):1017-23
pubmed: 24726154
Arthropod Struct Dev. 2020 Nov;59:100997
pubmed: 33039753
J Mol Evol. 2012 Feb;74(1-2):81-95
pubmed: 22362465
Nat Commun. 2021 Mar 19;12(1):1783
pubmed: 33741994
BMC Evol Biol. 2019 Jun 13;19(1):121
pubmed: 31195978
Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 Dec;4(12):1703-1712
pubmed: 33262517
Cladistics. 1990 Mar;6(1):1-38
pubmed: 34933471
Curr Biol. 2019 Jan 21;29(2):312-318.e3
pubmed: 30639106
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Dec 18;286(1917):20192426
pubmed: 31847768
BMC Evol Biol. 2010 Jul 13;10:210
pubmed: 20626897
Mol Biol Evol. 2021 May 19;38(6):2446-2467
pubmed: 33565584
Sci Adv. 2020 Dec 11;6(50):
pubmed: 33310849
Arthropod Struct Dev. 2007 Jun;36(2):245-52
pubmed: 18089103
Syst Biol. 2002 Jun;51(3):492-508
pubmed: 12079646
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2004 Apr;31(1):178-91
pubmed: 15019618
Syst Biol. 2013 Jul;62(4):611-5
pubmed: 23564032
BMC Evol Biol. 2010 Aug 02;10:235
pubmed: 20678229
Arthropod Struct Dev. 2010 Mar-May;39(2-3):124-42
pubmed: 20093195
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2022 Mar;168:107378
pubmed: 34968680
BMC Biol. 2017 Jul 31;15(1):62
pubmed: 28756775
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 6;9(1):18508
pubmed: 31811226
Mol Biol Evol. 2016 Aug;33(8):2117-34
pubmed: 27189539
Nature. 2019 Sep;573(7775):586-589
pubmed: 31511691
Nat Ecol Evol. 2018 Apr;2(4):623-627
pubmed: 29403076
Syst Biol. 2012 May;61(3):539-42
pubmed: 22357727
Integr Comp Biol. 2003 Aug;43(4):522-30
pubmed: 21680460
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Mar 29;284(1851):
pubmed: 28330926
Cladistics. 2002 Feb;18(1):5-70
pubmed: 14552352
Syst Biol. 2021 Feb 10;70(2):360-375
pubmed: 32462193
Syst Biol. 2021 Oct 13;70(6):1200-1212
pubmed: 33837789
Syst Biol. 2021 Jan 1;70(1):14-20
pubmed: 32497195
PeerJ. 2014 Nov 13;2:e641
pubmed: 25405073
Mol Biol Evol. 2014 Nov;31(11):2963-84
pubmed: 25107551
Mol Biol Evol. 2018 Feb 1;35(2):518-522
pubmed: 29077904
Front Zool. 2013 Jul 11;10(1):40
pubmed: 23842208
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2009 Jan;50(1):117-28
pubmed: 18992830
Sci Adv. 2021 Mar 19;7(12):
pubmed: 33741592
Mol Biol Evol. 2015 Jan;32(1):268-74
pubmed: 25371430
Evodevo. 2020 Aug 28;11:18
pubmed: 32874529
Nature. 2016 Sep 8;537(7619):225-228
pubmed: 27533041
Nat Commun. 2019 May 24;10(1):2295
pubmed: 31127117
Syst Biol. 2021 Apr 15;70(3):421-439
pubmed: 32882040
Dev Genes Evol. 2020 Mar;230(2):137-153
pubmed: 31927629
Genome Biol Evol. 2016 Sep 02;8(8):2565-80
pubmed: 27492233
Arthropod Struct Dev. 2021 Sep;64:101089
pubmed: 34399185
Curr Biol. 2020 Nov 2;30(21):4316-4321.e2
pubmed: 32916114
Cladistics. 1998 Jun;14(2):173-192
pubmed: 34902927
Mol Biol Evol. 2021 Sep 27;38(10):4322-4333
pubmed: 34097041
Cladistics. 2016 Jun;32(3):221-238
pubmed: 34727670
Mol Biol Evol. 2020 Sep 1;37(9):2727-2733
pubmed: 32365179
Syst Biol. 2020 Nov 1;69(6):1052-1067
pubmed: 32208492
Nat Methods. 2017 Jun;14(6):587-589
pubmed: 28481363
Syst Biol. 2019 Nov 1;68(6):896-917
pubmed: 30917194
Integr Comp Biol. 2017 Sep 01;57(3):499-509
pubmed: 28957514
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2004 May;79(2):253-300
pubmed: 15191225
Mol Biol Evol. 2021 Mar 9;38(3):891-903
pubmed: 32986823
Mol Biol Evol. 2018 Mar 1;35(3):543-548
pubmed: 29220515
BMC Bioinformatics. 2018 May 8;19(Suppl 6):153
pubmed: 29745866
Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 Dec;4(12):1694-1702
pubmed: 32747770
BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Dec 15;10:421
pubmed: 20003500
Biol Lett. 2019 Jul 26;15(7):20190288
pubmed: 31311486
Evol Bioinform Online. 2013 Oct 29;9:429-35
pubmed: 24250218
Arthropod Struct Dev. 2019 Jul;51:23-31
pubmed: 31176004
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2016 Aug;101:75-90
pubmed: 27150348
Nat Ecol Evol. 2017 Apr 10;1(5):126
pubmed: 28812701
Nature. 2001 Sep 13;413(6852):157-61
pubmed: 11557979