Complications after surgical treatment of pelvic fractures: a five-year follow-up of 194 patients.
Epidemiology
Pelvic fracture
Surgical treatment
Trauma
Journal
European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie
ISSN: 1432-1068
Titre abrégé: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9518037
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2023
May 2023
Historique:
received:
30
09
2021
accepted:
24
01
2022
medline:
26
4
2023
pubmed:
11
2
2022
entrez:
10
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Surgical treatment of pelvic fractures is an advanced intervention associated with multiple complications. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the rate of unplanned reoperations after pelvic fracture surgery. Secondary aims included occurrence of other adverse events and mortality. All adult patients ≥ 18 years with surgically treated pelvic fracture operated at the Karolinska University Hospital in Sweden between 2010 and 2019 were identified and retrospectively included. Data were collected through review of medical records and radiographs. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate factors associated with unplanned reoperations and other adverse events. A total of 194 patients were included with mean age (± SD, range) 45.4 (16, 18-83) years. 62% were males (n = 121) and the median (IQR) follow-up time was 1890 (1791) days (4.9 years). Forty-eight patients (25%) had an unplanned reoperation, with infection being the most common cause of reoperation (n = 18, 9.3%). Seventy-eight (40%) patients had an adverse event not requiring reoperation and the most common event was nerve injury (n = 34, 18%). Concomitant abdominal injury was identified as a risk factor for an adverse event (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.3-4.9, p < 0.01). 30-day mortality was 1.5% and 1-year mortality 6.2%. The rate of unplanned reoperation after pelvic fracture surgery was high, as was the rate of other adverse events not requiring surgery. No identified risk factor was found to predict further surgery, but concomitant abdominal injury was a risk factor for other adverse events. Mortality was low at both 30 days and 1 year.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35142922
doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03215-0
pii: 10.1007/s00590-022-03215-0
pmc: PMC10125928
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
877-882Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Balogh Z, King KL, Mackay P, McDougall D, Mackenzie S, Evans JA, Lyons T, Deane SA (2007) The epidemiology of pelvic ring fractures: a population-based study. J Trauma 63(5):1066–1073. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181589fa4
doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181589fa4
pubmed: 17993952
Abdelrahman H, El-Menyar A, Keil H, Alhammoud A, Ghouri SI, Babikir E, Asim M, Muenzberg M, Al-Thani H (2020) Patterns, management, and outcomes of traumatic pelvic fracture: insights from a multicenter study. J Orthop Surg Res 15(1):249. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01772-w
doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01772-w
pubmed: 32646448
pmcid: 7344030
Bellabarba C, Schildhauer TA, Vaccaro AR, Chapman JR (2006) Complications associated with surgical stabilization of high-grade sacral fracture dislocations with spino-pelvic instability. Spine 31(11 Suppl):S80–S88. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000217949.31762.be
doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000217949.31762.be
pubmed: 16685241
Sems SA, Johnson M, Cole PA, Byrd CT, Templeman DC (2010) Elevated body mass index increases early complications of surgical treatment of pelvic ring injuries. J Orthop Trauma 24(5):309–314. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181caa21e
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181caa21e
pubmed: 20418737
Bakhshayesh P, Weidenhielm L, Enocson A (2018) Factors affecting mortality and reoperations in high-energy pelvic fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 28(7):1273–1282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-018-2203-1
doi: 10.1007/s00590-018-2203-1
pubmed: 29675632
pmcid: 6132923
Rinne PP, Laitinen MK, Kannus P, Mattila VM (2020) The incidence of pelvic fractures and related surgery in the Finnish adult population: a nationwide study of 33,469 patients between 1997 and 2014. Acta Orthop 91(5):587–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1771827
doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1771827
pubmed: 32500790
pmcid: 8023963
Melhem E, Riouallon G, Habboubi K, Gabbas M, Jouffroy P (2020) Epidemiology of pelvic and acetabular fractures in France. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 106(5):831–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2019.11.019
doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.11.019
pubmed: 32019733
Lindahl J, Hirvensalo E, Böstman O, Santavirta S (1999) Failure of reduction with an external fixator in the management of injuries of the pelvic ring. Long-term evaluation of 110 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81(6):955–962. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.81b6.8571
doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.81b6.8571
pubmed: 10615965
Buller LT, Best MJ, Quinnan SM (2016) A nationwide analysis of pelvic ring fractures: incidence and trends in treatment, length of stay, and mortality. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 7(1):9–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2151458515616250
doi: 10.1177/2151458515616250
pubmed: 26929851
pmcid: 4748159
Zwingmann J, Südkamp NP, König B, Culemann U, Pohlemann T, Aghayev E, Schmal H (2013) Intra- and postoperative complications of navigated and conventional techniques in percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation after pelvic fractures: results from the German Pelvic Trauma Registry. Injury 44(12):1765–1772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2013.08.008
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.08.008
pubmed: 24001785
Ochenjele G, Reid KR, Castillo RC, Schoonover CD, Montalvo RN, Manson TT, Sciadini MF, Nascone JW, Carlini AR, OʼToole RV (2018) Predictors of unplanned reoperation after operative treatment of pelvic ring injuries. J Orthop Trauma 32(7):e245–e250. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001170
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001170
pubmed: 29634600
Krappinger D, Larndorfer R, Struve P, Rosenberger R, Arora R, Blauth M (2007) Minimally invasive transiliac plate osteosynthesis for type C injuries of the pelvic ring: a clinical and radiological follow-up. J Orthop Trauma 21(9):595–602. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e318158abcf
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318158abcf
pubmed: 17921833
Burgess AR, Eastridge BJ, Young JW et al (1990) Pelvic ring disruptions: effective classification system and treatment protocols. J Trauma 30:848–856
doi: 10.1097/00005373-199007000-00015
pubmed: 2381002
Hartensuer R, Lodde MF, Keller J, Eveslage M, Stolberg-Stolberg J, Riesenbeck O, Raschke MJ (2020) Safety, effect and feasibility of percutaneous SI-screw with and without augmentation: a 15-year retrospective analysis on over 640 screws. J Clin Med 9(8):2660. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082660
doi: 10.3390/jcm9082660
pubmed: 32824548
pmcid: 7463525
Demetriades D, Karaiskakis M, Toutouzas K, Alo K, Velmahos G, Chan L (2002) Pelvic fractures: epidemiology and predictors of associated abdominal injuries and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 195(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1072-7515(02)01197-3
doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(02)01197-3
pubmed: 12113532
Sharma OP, Oswanski MF, Rabbi J, Georgiadis GM, Lauer SK, Stombaugh HA (2008) Pelvic fracture risk assessment on admission. Am Surg 74(8):761–766
doi: 10.1177/000313480807400819
pubmed: 18705583
Palmcrantz J, Hardcastle TC, Naidoo SR, Muckart DJ, Ahlm K, Eriksson A (2012) Pelvic fractures at a new level 1 trauma centre: who dies from pelvic trauma? The Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital experience. Orthop Surg 4(4):216–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12002
doi: 10.1111/os.12002
pubmed: 23109305
pmcid: 6583249
Fitzgerald CA, Morse BC, Dente CJ (2014) Pelvic ring fractures: has mortality improved following the implementation of damage control resuscitation? Am J Surg 208(6):1083–1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.09.002
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.09.002
pubmed: 25440492
Mann SM, Banaszek D, Lajkosz K, Brogly SB, Stanojev SM, Evans C, Bardana DD, Yach J, Hall S (2018) High-energy trauma patients with pelvic fractures: management trends in Ontario, Canada. Injury 49(10):1830–1840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.06.044
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.06.044
pubmed: 29997027
Holtenius J, Bakhshayesh P, Enocson A (2018) The pelvic fracture: indicator of injury severity or lethal fracture? Injury 49(8):1568–1571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.06.016
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.06.016
pubmed: 29909925