Outcomes of Uveitic Macular Edema in the First-line Antimetabolites as Steroid-Sparing Treatment Uveitis Trial.


Journal

Ophthalmology
ISSN: 1549-4713
Titre abrégé: Ophthalmology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7802443

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2022
Historique:
received: 14 12 2021
revised: 31 01 2022
accepted: 02 02 2022
pubmed: 11 2 2022
medline: 25 5 2022
entrez: 10 2 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To evaluate the outcomes of uveitic macular edema at 6 and 12 months in patients treated with methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil. Subanalysis of a block-randomized, observer-masked, multicenter clinical trial. Patients were enrolled in the First-line Antimetabolites as Steroid-sparing Treatment (FAST) Uveitis Trial between August 2013 and August 2017. Patients were randomized to oral methotrexate 25 mg weekly or mycophenolate mofetil 1.5 g twice daily for 12 months, along with a corticosteroid taper. In addition to standardized clinical examination, all patients underwent spectral-domain OCT imaging at each visit. At the 6-month primary end point, patients who achieved treatment success continued the same treatment for a subsequent 6 months, and treatment failures switched to the other treatment group. Prespecified 6-month primary outcome and 12-month outcomes of central subfield thickness and visual acuity. Of 216 patients in the FAST Trial, 42 eyes (30 patients) in the methotrexate group and 55 eyes (41 patients) in the mycophenolate group had uveitic macular edema. Baseline median central subfield thickness was 359 μm and 342 μm in the methotrexate and mycophenolate groups, respectively. At 12 months, for those who stayed on the same treatment, macular thickness decreased from baseline by 30.5 μm (interquartile range [IQR], -132.3 to 4.0) and 54 μm (IQR, -95.5 to -4.5) in the methotrexate and mycophenolate groups, respectively (P = 0.73). In patients who switched treatment at 6 months, macular thickness decreased from baseline by 12.5 μm (IQR, -32.3 to -0.5) and 50 μm (IQR, -181.0 to -10.0) in the methotrexate and mycophenolate groups, respectively (P = 0.34). At 12 months, 7 of 19 eyes (37%) on methotrexate had resolution of macular edema compared with 15 of 25 eyes (60%) on mycophenolate (P = 0.10). For those who switched treatments, 8 of 17 eyes (47%) on methotrexate and 6 of 11 eyes (55%) on mycophenolate had resolution of macular edema (P = 0.92). Treatment with methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil for uveitic macular edema results in similar improvements in macular thickness at 6 and 12 months. At 12 months, approximately half of eyes in each antimetabolite group still had persistent macular edema.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35143800
pii: S0161-6420(22)00091-4
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.02.002
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antimetabolites 0
Enzyme Inhibitors 0
Immunosuppressive Agents 0
Steroids 0
Mycophenolic Acid HU9DX48N0T
Methotrexate YL5FZ2Y5U1

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

661-667

Subventions

Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : U10 EY021125
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Edmund Tsui (E)

F.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, California; Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, California; Stein Eye Institute at University of California, Los Angeles, California, and David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California.

Sivakumar R Rathinam (SR)

Uvea Services, Aravind Eye Hospitals and Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Madurai, India.

John A Gonzales (JA)

F.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, California; Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, California.

Radhika Thundikandy (R)

Uvea Services, Aravind Eye Hospitals and Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Madurai, India.

Anuradha Kanakath (A)

Uvea Services, Aravind Eye Hospitals and Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Coimbatore, India.

S Balamurugan (S)

Uvea Services, Aravind Eye Hospitals and Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Pondicherry, India.

R Vedhanayaki (R)

Uvea Services, Aravind Eye Hospitals and Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Madurai, India.

Lyndell L Lim (LL)

Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Australia.

Eric B Suhler (EB)

Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Hassan A Al-Dhibi (HA)

Division of Vitreoretinal Surgery and Uveitis, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Thuy Doan (T)

F.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, California; Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, California.

Jeremy Keenan (J)

F.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, California; Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, California.

Caleb D Ebert (CD)

F.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, California.

Eric Kim (E)

F.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, California.

Brian Madow (B)

Department of Ophthalmology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida.

Travis C Porco (TC)

F.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, California; Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, California; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California.

Nisha R Acharya (NR)

F.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, California; Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, California; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California. Electronic address: nisha.acharya@ucsf.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH