Using DNA metabarcoding as a novel approach for analysis of platypus diet.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 02 2022
10 02 2022
Historique:
received:
07
06
2021
accepted:
14
01
2022
entrez:
11
2
2022
pubmed:
12
2
2022
medline:
16
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Platypuses (Ornithorhynchus anatinus) forage for macroinvertebrate prey exclusively in freshwater habitats. Because food material in their faeces is well digested and mostly unidentifiable, previous dietary studies have relied on cheek pouch assessments and stable isotope analysis. Given DNA metabarcoding can identify species composition from only fragments of genetic material, we investigated its effectiveness in analysing the diet of platypuses, and to assess variation across seasons and sexes. Of the 18 orders and 60 families identified, Ephemeroptera and Diptera were the most prevalent orders, detected in 100% of samples, followed by Trichoptera, Pulmonata, and Odonata (86.21% of samples). Caenidae and Chironomidae were the most common families. Diptera had a high average DNA read, suggesting it is an important dietary component that may have been underestimated in previous studies. We found no variation in diet between sexes and only minimal changes between seasons. DNA metabarcoding proved to be a highly useful tool for assessing platypus diet, improving prey identification compared to cheek pouch analysis, which can underestimate soft-bodied organisms, and stable isotope analysis which cannot distinguish all taxa isotopically. This will be a useful tool for investigating how platypus prey diversity is impacted by habitat degradation as a result of anthropogenic stressors.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35145160
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06023-y
pii: 10.1038/s41598-022-06023-y
pmc: PMC8831530
doi:
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2247Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Mol Ecol. 2011 Apr;20(8):1772-80
pubmed: 21366747
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 11;11(1):3590
pubmed: 33574364
Mol Ecol. 2019 Jan;28(2):266-280
pubmed: 30230073
J Wildl Dis. 2016 Apr;52(2 Suppl):S28-39
pubmed: 26845297
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Feb 7;270(1512):313-21
pubmed: 12614582
Mol Ecol Resour. 2013 Sep;13(5):851-61
pubmed: 23848937
PeerJ. 2019 Jan 24;7:e6307
pubmed: 30697490
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jun 30;112(26):8019-24
pubmed: 26034267
Heredity (Edinb). 2015 May;114(5):525-36
pubmed: 25649502
Zookeys. 2015 Jun 08;(507):99-114
pubmed: 26155072
Front Zool. 2013 Jun 14;10:34
pubmed: 23767809
J Wildl Dis. 2016 Apr;52(2 Suppl):S14-27
pubmed: 26845296
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 23;8(1):5117
pubmed: 29572497
J Physiol. 1988 Jun;400:349-66
pubmed: 3418529
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 23;12(10):e0186929
pubmed: 29059215
J Fish Biol. 2017 May;90(5):2214-2219
pubmed: 28345142
Mol Ecol Resour. 2014 Mar;14(2):306-23
pubmed: 24128180
Mol Ecol. 2012 Apr;21(8):2045-50
pubmed: 22486824