Postural Control Differences between Patients with Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction and Healthy People during Gait.
PTTD
center of pressure
gait
postural control
time-to-boundary
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 01 2022
24 01 2022
Historique:
received:
30
12
2021
revised:
21
01
2022
accepted:
23
01
2022
entrez:
15
2
2022
pubmed:
16
2
2022
medline:
3
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Patients with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction (PTTD) may exhibit postural instability during walking likely due to a loss of medial longitudinal arch, abnormal foot alignment, and pain. While many studies have investigated gait alterations in PTTD, there is no understanding of dynamic postural control mechanisms in this population during gait, which will help guide rehabilitation and gait training programs for patients with PTTD. The purpose of the study was to assess dynamic postural control mechanisms in patients with stage II PTTD as compared to age and gender matched healthy controls. Eleven patients with stage II PTTD (4 males and 7 females; age 59 ± 1 years; height 1.66 ± 0.12 m; mass 84.2 ± 16.0 kg) and ten gender and age matched controls were recruited in this study. Participants were asked to walk along a 10 m walkway. Ten Vicon cameras and four AMTI force platforms were used to collect kinematic and center of pressure (COP) data while participants performed gait. To test differences between PTTD vs. control groups, independent Patients with PTTD had significantly higher double stance ratio (+23%) and anterior-posterior (AP) time to contact (TTC) percentage (+16%) as compared to healthy control. However, PTTD had lower AP COP excursion (-19%), AP COP velocity (-30%), and medial-lateral (ML) COP velocity (-40%) as compared to healthy controls. Mean ML COP trace values for PTTD were significantly decreased (-23%) as compared to controls, indicating COP trace for PTTD tends to be closer to the medial boundary than controls during single-support phase of walking. PTTD patients showed more conservative and cautious postural strategies which may help maintain balance and reduce the need for postural adjustment during PTTD gait. They also showed more medially shifted COP patterns than healthy controls during single-support phase of walking. Dynamic postural control outcomes could be used to develop effective gait training programs aimed at alleviating a medial shift of COP (everted foot) for individuals with PTTD in order to improve their functionality and gait efficiency.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Patients with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction (PTTD) may exhibit postural instability during walking likely due to a loss of medial longitudinal arch, abnormal foot alignment, and pain. While many studies have investigated gait alterations in PTTD, there is no understanding of dynamic postural control mechanisms in this population during gait, which will help guide rehabilitation and gait training programs for patients with PTTD. The purpose of the study was to assess dynamic postural control mechanisms in patients with stage II PTTD as compared to age and gender matched healthy controls.
METHODS
Eleven patients with stage II PTTD (4 males and 7 females; age 59 ± 1 years; height 1.66 ± 0.12 m; mass 84.2 ± 16.0 kg) and ten gender and age matched controls were recruited in this study. Participants were asked to walk along a 10 m walkway. Ten Vicon cameras and four AMTI force platforms were used to collect kinematic and center of pressure (COP) data while participants performed gait. To test differences between PTTD vs. control groups, independent
RESULTS
Patients with PTTD had significantly higher double stance ratio (+23%) and anterior-posterior (AP) time to contact (TTC) percentage (+16%) as compared to healthy control. However, PTTD had lower AP COP excursion (-19%), AP COP velocity (-30%), and medial-lateral (ML) COP velocity (-40%) as compared to healthy controls. Mean ML COP trace values for PTTD were significantly decreased (-23%) as compared to controls, indicating COP trace for PTTD tends to be closer to the medial boundary than controls during single-support phase of walking.
CONCLUSION
PTTD patients showed more conservative and cautious postural strategies which may help maintain balance and reduce the need for postural adjustment during PTTD gait. They also showed more medially shifted COP patterns than healthy controls during single-support phase of walking. Dynamic postural control outcomes could be used to develop effective gait training programs aimed at alleviating a medial shift of COP (everted foot) for individuals with PTTD in order to improve their functionality and gait efficiency.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35162324
pii: ijerph19031301
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031301
pmc: PMC8835140
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Acta Orthop Scand. 2002 Dec;73(6):647-52
pubmed: 12553511
Gait Posture. 2008 Feb;27(2):331-9
pubmed: 17583511
Gait Posture. 2018 Sep;65:39-44
pubmed: 30558944
Foot Ankle Int. 2015 Jan;36(1):83-9
pubmed: 25212864
Gait Posture. 2007 Apr;25(4):555-64
pubmed: 16876415
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Feb;(239):196-206
pubmed: 2912622
Foot Ankle Int. 2010 Apr;31(4):320-8
pubmed: 20371019
Foot Ankle Surg. 2009;15(2):75-81
pubmed: 19410173
Gait Posture. 2006 Feb;23(2):142-8
pubmed: 16399509
Foot Ankle Int. 2005 Dec;26(12):1074-80
pubmed: 16390642
Foot Ankle Clin. 2007 Jun;12(2):233-49, v
pubmed: 17561198
Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Jan;34(1):131-9
pubmed: 23386773
Foot Ankle Int. 2009 Jul;30(7):613-8
pubmed: 19589306
Gait Posture. 2013 Feb;37(2):264-8
pubmed: 22939754
Instr Course Lect. 1997;46:393-405
pubmed: 9143981
Appl Ergon. 2020 May;85:103057
pubmed: 32174345
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2008 Mar-Apr;98(2):102-6
pubmed: 18347117
Foot Ankle Int. 2009 Jun;30(6):530-9
pubmed: 19486631
Gait Posture. 2020 Mar;77:283-287
pubmed: 32106044
Gait Posture. 2018 Jun;63:91-96
pubmed: 29727777
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Sep;36(9):635-44
pubmed: 17017268
J Appl Biomech. 2006 May;22(2):155-61
pubmed: 16871006
Foot Ankle Int. 2001 Apr;22(4):292-300
pubmed: 11354441
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1998 Jan;53(1):B71-8
pubmed: 9467425
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997 Mar;45(3):313-20
pubmed: 9063277
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2006;29(1):10-7
pubmed: 16630370
Gait Posture. 2012 May;36(1):56-60
pubmed: 22310303
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9
pubmed: 19565683