Granger Causality Analysis of Chignolin Folding.


Journal

Journal of chemical theory and computation
ISSN: 1549-9626
Titre abrégé: J Chem Theory Comput
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101232704

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Mar 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 16 2 2022
medline: 7 4 2022
entrez: 15 2 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Constantly advancing computer simulations of biomolecules provide huge amounts of data that are difficult to interpret. In particular, obtaining insights into functional aspects of macromolecular dynamics, often related to cascades of transient events, calls for methodologies that depart from the well-grounded framework of equilibrium statistical physics. One of the approaches toward the analysis of complex temporal data which has found applications in the fields of neuroscience and econometrics is Granger causality analysis. It allows determining which components of multidimensional time series are most influential for the evolution of the entire system, thus providing insights into causal relations within the dynamic structure of interest. In this work, we apply Granger analysis to a long molecular dynamics trajectory depicting repetitive folding and unfolding of a mini β-hairpin protein, CLN025. We find objective, quantitative evidence indicating that rearrangements within the hairpin turn region are determinant for protein folding and unfolding. On the contrary, interactions between hairpin arms score low on the causality scale. Taken together, these findings clearly favor the concept of zipperlike folding, which is one of two postulated β-hairpin folding mechanisms. More importantly, the results demonstrate the possibility of a conclusive application of Granger causality analysis to a biomolecular system.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35167755
doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00945
pmc: PMC8908741
doi:

Substances chimiques

Oligopeptides 0
chignolin 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1936-1944

Références

J Phys Chem Lett. 2012 May 3;3(9):1117-1123
pubmed: 22737279
Phys Rev Lett. 2000 Jul 10;85(2):461-4
pubmed: 10991308
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Jan 17;13(1):e1005319
pubmed: 28095404
Biophys J. 2009 Oct 21;97(8):2338-47
pubmed: 19843466
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 May 10;102(19):6732-7
pubmed: 15814618
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Feb 19;110(8):2828-33
pubmed: 23382249
J Chem Phys. 2011 Feb 14;134(6):065101
pubmed: 21322734
Chem Asian J. 2007 May 4;2(5):591-8
pubmed: 17465405
J Chem Phys. 2013 Jul 7;139(1):015102
pubmed: 23822324
Biol Cybern. 1991;65(3):203-10
pubmed: 1912013
J Phys Chem B. 2015 Mar 12;119(10):3893-900
pubmed: 25692381
J Chem Theory Comput. 2015 Jun 9;11(6):2801-12
pubmed: 26575573
Phys Rev Lett. 2006 Jun 16;96(23):238102
pubmed: 16803409
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2012 Sep 28;14(36):12442-50
pubmed: 22441137
Biophys J. 2012 Apr 18;102(8):1897-906
pubmed: 22768946
J Phys Chem B. 2015 Dec 10;119(49):15247-55
pubmed: 26601695
J Am Chem Soc. 2008 Nov 19;130(46):15327-31
pubmed: 18950166
J Chem Phys. 2011 May 7;134(17):174105
pubmed: 21548671
J Biol Chem. 2020 Jan 3;295(1):15-33
pubmed: 31712314
J Mol Biol. 2005 Nov 18;354(1):173-83
pubmed: 16236315
J Chem Theory Comput. 2020 Apr 14;16(4):2584-2593
pubmed: 32196329
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 9;110(15):5915-20
pubmed: 23503848
Proteins. 2015 Jul;83(7):1307-15
pubmed: 25973961
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Aug 3;96(16):9062-7
pubmed: 10430895
Int J Mol Sci. 2009 Jun 22;10(6):2838-48
pubmed: 19582232
Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2016 May 27;67:669-90
pubmed: 27090846
Structure. 2004 Aug;12(8):1507-18
pubmed: 15296744
Sci Rep. 2016 Nov 15;6:37012
pubmed: 27845397
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jul 5;108(27):11087-92
pubmed: 21690352
Nat Phys. 2010 Oct 1;6(10):751-758
pubmed: 21297873
J Phys Chem B. 2011 Jul 14;115(27):8806-12
pubmed: 21648487
Neuron. 2018 Sep 19;99(6):1129-1143
pubmed: 30236283
J Am Chem Soc. 2018 Feb 21;140(7):2386-2396
pubmed: 29323881
Chem Rev. 2016 Jun 8;116(11):6516-51
pubmed: 26807783
Nature. 2021 Aug;596(7873):583-589
pubmed: 34265844
Science. 2011 Oct 28;334(6055):517-20
pubmed: 22034434
Phys Rev Lett. 2009 Dec 4;103(23):238701
pubmed: 20366183
Annu Rev Biophys. 2016 Jul 5;45:233-51
pubmed: 27391927
J Am Chem Soc. 2012 Sep 5;134(35):14476-82
pubmed: 22873643
Science. 2010 Oct 15;330(6002):341-6
pubmed: 20947758
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2006 Aug;16(4):514-24
pubmed: 16837192
Nature. 1997 Nov 13;390(6656):196-9
pubmed: 9367160
J Chem Theory Comput. 2013 Aug 13;9(8):
pubmed: 24223527
Biophys J. 2009 Sep 16;97(6):1747-55
pubmed: 19751680
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2004 Nov;70(5 Pt 1):050902
pubmed: 15600583
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2012 Feb;22(1):52-61
pubmed: 22257762
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2013 Feb;23(1):58-65
pubmed: 23237705
J Chem Phys. 2017 Sep 14;147(10):104107
pubmed: 28915754
J Chem Phys. 2020 Nov 14;153(18):185102
pubmed: 33187403
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Aug 3;96(16):9068-73
pubmed: 10430896
J Chem Theory Comput. 2015 Nov 10;11(11):5525-42
pubmed: 26574340
FEBS Lett. 2006 Jun 12;580(14):3422-6
pubmed: 16709409

Auteurs

Marcin Sobieraj (M)

Faculty of Physics, University of Warsaw, Pasteura 5, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland.
Centre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, Banacha 2c, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.

Piotr Setny (P)

Centre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, Banacha 2c, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.

Articles similaires

Photosynthesis Ribulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylase Carbon Dioxide Molecular Dynamics Simulation Cyanobacteria
Databases, Protein Protein Domains Protein Folding Proteins Deep Learning
Fucosyltransferases Drug Repositioning Molecular Docking Simulation Molecular Dynamics Simulation Humans
Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1 Ligands Molecular Dynamics Simulation Protein Binding Thermodynamics

Classifications MeSH