Reproduction dynamics of planktonic microbial eukaryotes in the open ocean.
individual-based model
planktonic eukaryotes
population dynamics
reproduction ecology
sexual versus asexual reproduction
survival capacity
Journal
Journal of the Royal Society, Interface
ISSN: 1742-5662
Titre abrégé: J R Soc Interface
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101217269
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2022
02 2022
Historique:
entrez:
15
2
2022
pubmed:
16
2
2022
medline:
17
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Understanding the biology of reproduction of an organismal lineage is important for retracing key evolutionary processes, yet gaining detailed insights often poses major challenges. Planktonic Foraminifera are globally distributed marine microbial eukaryotes and important contributors to the global carbon cycle. They cannot routinely be cultured under laboratory conditions across generations, and thus details of their life cycle remain incomplete. The production of flagellated gametes has long been taken as an indication of exclusively sexual reproduction, but recent research suggests the existence of an additional asexual generation in the life cycle. To gain a better understanding of the reproductive biology of planktonic Foraminifera, we applied a dynamic, individual-based modelling approach with parameters based on laboratory and field observations to test if sexual reproduction is sufficient for maintaining viable populations. We show that temporal synchronization and potentially spatial concentration of gamete release seems inevitable for maintenance of the population under sexual reproduction. We hypothesize that sexual reproduction is likely beneficial during the adaptation to new environments, while population sustenance in stable environments can be ensured through asexual reproduction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35167772
doi: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0860
pmc: PMC8847003
doi:
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5803655']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20210860Références
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e22872
pubmed: 21829662
Am Nat. 2017 Sep;190(3):350-362
pubmed: 28829645
PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26665
pubmed: 22028935
J R Soc Interface. 2019 Oct 31;16(159):20190324
pubmed: 31640498
Mutat Res. 1964 May;106:2-9
pubmed: 14195748
J Exp Biol. 2012 Mar 15;215(Pt 6):1008-16
pubmed: 22357594
Mol Ecol. 2012 Aug;21(16):4063-73
pubmed: 22738662
New Phytol. 2017 Jul;215(1):140-156
pubmed: 28429538
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2011 Nov;86(4):900-27
pubmed: 21492379
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 09;11(2):e0148363
pubmed: 26859838
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jul 19;102(29):10040-5
pubmed: 16006514
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jul 21;112(29):8827-34
pubmed: 26195746
Nature. 1988 Dec 1;336(6198):435-40
pubmed: 3057385
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 May 22;270(1519):1015-22
pubmed: 12803890
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 24;9(3):e92148
pubmed: 24663038
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 14;14(10):e0223490
pubmed: 31609985
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Mar 16;96(6):2864-8
pubmed: 10077602
Nat Commun. 2018 Jan 24;9(1):350
pubmed: 29367589
Science. 1976 May 28;192(4242):890-2
pubmed: 946914
Science. 2015 May 22;348(6237):1261605
pubmed: 25999516
Sci Adv. 2020 Jul 10;6(28):
pubmed: 32937545