Validation of UK Biobank data for mental health outcomes: A pilot study using secondary care electronic health records.
Data resource
Linkage studies
Mental health
Neuro-epidemiology
UK Biobank
Validation study
Journal
International journal of medical informatics
ISSN: 1872-8243
Titre abrégé: Int J Med Inform
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 9711057
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2022
04 2022
Historique:
received:
01
03
2021
revised:
20
12
2021
accepted:
20
01
2022
pubmed:
16
2
2022
medline:
5
4
2022
entrez:
15
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
UK Biobank (UKB) is widely employed to investigate mental health disorders and related exposures; however, its applicability and relevance in a clinical setting and the assumptions required have not been sufficiently and systematically investigated. Here, we present the first validation study using secondary care mental health data with linkage to UKB from Oxford - Clinical Record Interactive Search (CRIS) focusing on comparison of demographic information, diagnostic outcome, medication record and cognitive test results, with missing data and the implied bias from both resources depicted. We applied a natural language processing model to extract information embedded in unstructured text from clinical notes and attachments. Using a contingency table we compared the demographic information recorded in UKB and CRIS. We calculated the positive predictive value (PPV, proportion of true positives cases detected) for mental health diagnosis and relevant medication. Amongst the cohort of 854 subjects, PPVs for any mental health diagnosis for dementia, depression, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia were 41.6%, and were 59.5%, 12.5%, 50.0% and 52.6%, respectively. Self-reported medication records in UKB had general PPV of 47.0%, with the prevalence of frequently prescribed medicines to each typical mental health disorder considerably different from the information provided by CRIS. UKB is highly multimodal, but with limited follow-up records, whereas CRIS offers a longitudinal high-resolution clinical picture with more than ten years of observations. The linkage of both datasets will reduce the self-report bias and synergistically augment diverse modalities into a unified resource to facilitate more robust research in mental health.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35168089
pii: S1386-5056(22)00018-1
doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104704
pmc: PMC8889024
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
104704Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Références
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Mar 25;10:80
pubmed: 20338040
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2019 Sep;28(3):e1796
pubmed: 31397039
Br J Psychiatry. 2021 May;218(5):261-267
pubmed: 32713359
BMJ Open. 2012 Nov 19;2(6):
pubmed: 23166129
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Jul 26;16:263
pubmed: 27455845
J Biomed Inform. 2020 Jul;107:103429
pubmed: 32387393
Neural Comput. 1997 Nov 15;9(8):1735-80
pubmed: 9377276
Lancet. 2007 Sep 8;370(9590):859-77
pubmed: 17804063
JMIR Med Inform. 2018 Feb 23;6(1):e11
pubmed: 29475824
PLoS Med. 2015 Mar 31;12(3):e1001779
pubmed: 25826379
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 15;11:268
pubmed: 32351413
Evid Based Ment Health. 2020 Feb;23(1):21-26
pubmed: 32046989
Eur J Epidemiol. 2019 Jun;34(6):557-565
pubmed: 30806901
Neural Netw. 2020 Jan;121:132-139
pubmed: 31541881
BJPsych Open. 2018 Apr 03;4(3):83-90
pubmed: 29971151
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 30;6(11):e012177
pubmed: 27903560
Artif Intell Med. 2021 Aug;118:102086
pubmed: 34412834
J Intern Med. 2019 Oct;286(4):389-397
pubmed: 31283063
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 12;18(1):293
pubmed: 30223823