Effect of proximal optimization technique on coronary bifurcation stent failure: Insights from the multicenter randomized PROPOT trial.
complex PCI
drug-eluting stent
optical coherence tomography
percutaneous coronary intervention
Journal
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions
ISSN: 1522-726X
Titre abrégé: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100884139
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2022
03 2022
Historique:
revised:
24
12
2021
received:
02
11
2021
accepted:
26
01
2022
pubmed:
17
2
2022
medline:
22
4
2022
entrez:
16
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We investigated the effect of proximal optimization technique (POT) on coronary bifurcation stent failure (BSF) in cross-over stenting by comparing with the kissing balloon technique (KBT) in a multicenter randomized PROPOT trial. POT is recommended due to increased certainty for optimal stent expansion and side branch (SB) wiring. We randomized 120 patients treated with crossover stenting into the POT group, which was followed by SB dilation (SBD), and the KBT group. Finally, 52 and 57 patients were analyzed by optical coherence tomography before SBD and at the final procedure, respectively. Composite BSF was defined as a maximal malapposition distance of >400 μm, or malapposed and SB-jailed strut rates of >5.95% and >21.4%, respectively. Composite BSF before SBD in the POT and KBT groups was observed in 29% and 26% of patients, respectively. In the POT group, differences in stent volumetric index between the proximal and distal bifurcation (odds ratio [OR] 60.35, 95% confidential interval [CI] 0.13-0.93, p = 0.036) and between the proximal bifurcation and bifurcation core (OR: 3.68, 95% CI: 1.01-13.40, p = 0.048) were identified as independent risk factors. Composite BSF at final in 27% and 32%, and unplanned additional procedures in 38% and 25% were observed, respectively. Composite BSF before SBD was a risk factor for the former (OR: 6.33, 95% CI: 1.10-36.50, p = 0.039) and the latter (OR: 6.43, 95% CI: 1.25-33.10, p = 0.026) in the POT group. POT did not result in a favorable trend in BSF. Insufficient expansion of the bifurcation core after POT was associated with BSF.
Sections du résumé
OBJECTIVE
We investigated the effect of proximal optimization technique (POT) on coronary bifurcation stent failure (BSF) in cross-over stenting by comparing with the kissing balloon technique (KBT) in a multicenter randomized PROPOT trial.
BACKGROUND
POT is recommended due to increased certainty for optimal stent expansion and side branch (SB) wiring.
METHODS
We randomized 120 patients treated with crossover stenting into the POT group, which was followed by SB dilation (SBD), and the KBT group. Finally, 52 and 57 patients were analyzed by optical coherence tomography before SBD and at the final procedure, respectively. Composite BSF was defined as a maximal malapposition distance of >400 μm, or malapposed and SB-jailed strut rates of >5.95% and >21.4%, respectively.
RESULTS
Composite BSF before SBD in the POT and KBT groups was observed in 29% and 26% of patients, respectively. In the POT group, differences in stent volumetric index between the proximal and distal bifurcation (odds ratio [OR] 60.35, 95% confidential interval [CI] 0.13-0.93, p = 0.036) and between the proximal bifurcation and bifurcation core (OR: 3.68, 95% CI: 1.01-13.40, p = 0.048) were identified as independent risk factors. Composite BSF at final in 27% and 32%, and unplanned additional procedures in 38% and 25% were observed, respectively. Composite BSF before SBD was a risk factor for the former (OR: 6.33, 95% CI: 1.10-36.50, p = 0.039) and the latter (OR: 6.43, 95% CI: 1.25-33.10, p = 0.026) in the POT group.
CONCLUSION
POT did not result in a favorable trend in BSF. Insufficient expansion of the bifurcation core after POT was associated with BSF.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1047-1058Subventions
Organisme : Medtronic
Informations de copyright
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Burzotta F, Lassen JF, Louvard Y, et al. European Bifurcation Club white paper on stenting techniques for patients with bifurcated coronary artery lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;96:1067-1079.
Finet G, Derimay F, Motreff P, et al. Comparative analysis of sequential proximal optimizing technique versus kissing balloon inflation technique in provisional bifurcation stenting: fractal coronary bifurcation bench test. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:1308-1317.
Murasato Y, Iwasaki K, Yamamoto T, et al. Optimal kissing balloon inflation after single-stent deployment in a coronary bifurcation model. EuroIntervention. 2014;10:934-941.
Chevalier B, Mamas MA, Hovasse T, et al. Clinical Outcomes of Proximal Optimization Technique (POT) in bifurcation stenting. EuroIntervention. 2021;17:e910-e918.
Yang JH, Lee JM, Park TK, et al. The proximal optimization technique improves clinical outcomes when treated without kissing ballooning in patients with a bifurcation lesion. Korean Circ J. 2019;49:485-494.
Hakim D, Chatterjee A, Alli O, et al. Role of proximal optimization technique guided by intravascular ultrasound on stent expansion, stent symmetry index, and side-branch hemodynamics in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:e005535.
Derimay F, Finet G, Souteyrand G, et al. Benefit of a new provisional stenting strategy, the re-proximal optimisation technique: the REPOT clinical study. EuroIntervention. 2018;14:e325-e332.
Lee CHNC, Cho YK, Yoon HJ, et al. 5-year outcome of simple crossover stenting in coronary bifurcation lesions compared with side branch opening. JACC: Asia. 2021;1:53-64.
Murasato Y, Mori T, Okamura T, et al. and Investigators DOBR. Efficacy of the proximal optimization technique on crossover stenting in coronary bifurcation lesions in the 3D-OCT bifurcation registry. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;35:981-990.
Andreasen LN, Holm NR, Webber B, et al. Critical aspects of balloon position during final proximal optimization technique (POT) in coronary bifurcation stenting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;96:31-39.
Kume T, Yamada R, Koyama T, et al. Coronary bifurcation bench test using multimodality imaging: Impact of stent strut link location on stent deformity and jailed side-branch orifices during re-proximal optimizing technique. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;93:E17-E23.
Watanabe Y, Murasato Y, Yamawaki M, et al. Proximal optimisation technique versus final kissing balloon inflation in coronary bifurcation lesions: the randomised, multicenter PROPOT Trial. EuroIntervention. 2021;17:747-756.
Morino Y, Yamamoto H, Mitsudo K, et al. Functional formula to determine adequate balloon diameter of simultaneous kissing balloon technique for treatment of bifurcated coronary lesions: clinical validation by volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis. Circ J. 2008;72:886-892.
Murasato Y, Kinoshita Y, Yamawaki M, et al. Efficacy of kissing balloon inflation after provisional stenting in bifurcation lesions guided by intravascular ultrasound: short and midterm results of the J-REVERSE registry. EuroIntervention. 2016;11:e1237-e1248.
Murasato Y, Finet G, Foin N. Final kissing balloon inflation: the whole story. EuroIntervention. 2015;11(Suppl V):V81-V85.
Sotomi Y, Onuma Y, Dijkstra J, et al. Fate of post-procedural malapposition of everolimus-eluting polymeric bioresorbable scaffold and everolimus-eluting cobalt chromium metallic stent in human coronary arteries: sequential assessment with optical coherence tomography in ABSORB Japan trial. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;19:59-66.
Raber L, Mintz GS, Koskinas KC, et al. and Group ESCSD. Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 1: guidance and optimization of coronary interventions. An expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:3281-3300.
Taniwaki M, Radu MD, Zaugg S, et al. Mechanisms of very late drug-eluting stent thrombosis assessed by optical coherence tomography. Circulation. 2016;133:650-660.
Suzuki S, Nakatani S, Sotomi Y, et al. Fate of different types of intrastent tissue protrusion: optical coherence tomography and angioscopic serial observations at baseline and 9-day and 3-month follow-up. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:95-97.
Mori H, Torii S, Harari E, et al. Pathological mechanisms of left main stent failure. Int J Cardiol. 2018;263:9-16.
Murasato Y, Nishihara M, Mori T, et al. Feasibility and efficacy of the ultrashort side branch dedicated balloon in coronary bifurcation stenting. EuroIntervention. 2021;17:e425-e432.
Antoniadis AP, Mortier P, Kassab G, et al. Biomechanical modeling to improve coronary artery bifurcation stenting: expert review document on techniques and clinical implementation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:1281-1296.
Rab T, Sheiban I, Louvard Y, et al. Current interventions for the left main bifurcation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:849-865.